Category Archives: Muslim Conflicts

IMAM KASOZI ON NBS’S ‘MORNING BREEZE’

Standard


Friends,

I would like to thank NBS TV for giving Imam Kasozi a chance to explain himself on the ongoing arbitrary arrests and detention of Muslims in Uganda in the name of terrorism in Madrasas. I have watched the program on YouTube on the following link:http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9dIfbF6RpAA , and I must say that I was not impressed at all despite the good points put forward by those involved.

A couple of thoughts: there was a lot of shouting involved by the duo (Imam Kasozi and the male moderator), and they kept interfering each other. The female moderator did okay though the male moderator never gave her a chance to express herself a bit more. Secondly, i thought this program should have been better conducted in Luganda rather than English. There was also a lot of shouting in English instead of talking about the real issues. The Luganda part of the program was superb, and I think everybody looked and sounded more comfortable in the language. So, what’s wrong with having the ‘Morning breeze’ in Luganda instead of English, anyway?

I found Afande Ssekate Vincent‘s comments on Madrasas laughable in that they had no basis in reality as far as Madrasas in Uganda are concerned. It is one of the widespread assumptions of the war on terrorism that Madrassas are breeding grounds for terrorism. Vincent Kaweesa or is it Ssekate, is the deputy Spokesperson for the Police, and he was, at least, very calm while explaining his issues. He said that he had approached the leaders at Uganda Muslim Supreme Council [UMSC] who denied of any knowledge of the Madrasas that were run by the Imams that were arrested. If this is true, then it’s very unfortunate and it would be good for the Muslim community to get a verified statement from the leadership at UMSC about this whole issue. This was an opportunity to explain to the police what a Madrasa means, and UMSC let Muslims down. Somebody has got to take the bullet for it.

What i failed to understand is why there is a sudden need by the government to have the Madrasas registered or supervised? What is there to register? As far as I know, a Madrassa is something almost every Muslim home has got. It doesn’t necessarily have to be a formal school or building or anything like that…… as its main aim is to teach kids about their religion. Personally, I learned the Qur’an mainly from my grandfather’s house, and we used to have other students from the neighborhood who used to learn with us. I don’t see anything wrong with this arrangement!

As Imam Kasozi explained, Madrassa is an equivalent of ‘Omujiji’ among the Catholics. All they teach kids are mainly the fundamentals of their religion. A kid also gets a chance to make friends with kids of the same religion. The whole arrangement exposes the kid to their religion, and I think this is OK. Nobody taught me to hate or kill anyone while I was learning my religion at home. While madrassas may breed Jihadists who have learned to recite the Koran in Arabic by rote, such institutions do not teach the technical or linguistic skills necessary to be an effective terrorist. Indeed, there is little or no evidence that madrasas produce terrorists capable of causing havoc anywhere in the world. So, I’m wondering where some people are getting all these ideas from. The current USA president was reportedly once in a Madarasa as a kid in Indonesia but he didn’t turn out to be a terrorist, did he? Obama lived in Indonesia as a child, from 1967 to 1971, with his mother and step-father and has acknowledged attending a Muslim school

So, without any evidence to back up the allegations that have been made by the police against some Muslims, police’s statement merely serves as an empty vessel to justify the status quo. From what Imam kasozi said, it looks like the police have now got an agenda to ‘ARREST, IMPRISON and SILENCE’ some Muslims which I find so unfair. Based on the comments made by another policeman who called after Afande Vincent, the police now hardly seem the kind of body that would feel any obligation to be straight about why and how they are arresting Muslims. The policeman categorically denied on national TV that they were holding more than one Imam in their custody contrary to the evidence presented by Imam Kasozi to the press.

It’s hilarious how Islam freaks some people out because i have always taken it to be a peaceful religion. The male moderator’s opinions were far too radical. There are billions of peaceful and responsible Muslims who are watching in amazement why the police are acting like this against fellow Muslims in Uganda. The radicals that are hijacking the Muslim religion for their own criminal enterprises are the problem, not the entire Muslim population.

If parents want to teach religion to their kids, they can do so in the home, in the church, temple, mosque or synagogue, at Bible camp, at Parochial School, Ashram, Yeshiva or Madrassa, at Sunday school, at the Kingdom Hall, at the Dianetics Centre, community centre, or many other options. This does not need a license of some sort or permission from UMSC or police because kids are ‘confined’ somewhere.

Cops should also stay within their legal bounds when arresting people because community policing may become impossible for the police to police. It’s really pitiful how generation after generation of our police has been wasted on stuff like this that cuts them off from the very communities they are supposed to protect. They are all being “used” for political purposes and that is so sad.

Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba

Stalk my blog at: http://semuwemba.com/

Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/semuwemba

Join me on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/abbey.k.semuwemba
‘”The three separate branches of government were developed as a check and balance for one another. It is within the court’s duty to ensure that power is never condense[d] into a single branch of government.” – Judge Anna Diggs Taylor

Muslim Leaders urged to promote interfaith dialogue

Standard

KABALEUGANDA MUSLIM SUPREME COUNCIL (UMSC)
28 January 2013

The Mufti of Uganda His Eminence Sheikh Shaban Ramadhan Mubaje has urged all District Kadhis (Muslim District Council Leaders) to promote cooperation with members of other religious denominations.
The Mufti made the appeal while addressing thousands of Muslims who had turned up at Karigina Mosque in Kabale town to witness the swearing in of the new and acting District Kadhi of Kabale Muslim District Sheikh Kaabu Lule.

He said that it is a Uganda Muslim Supreme Council constitutional requirement for Muslim leaders to establish good relations with other religious denominations. The Mufti mentioned the Inter Religious Council of Uganda as one of the already existing efforts to promote Multi faith dialogue.
“UMSC is a member of IRCU and we are already implementing a number of joint programs, so I encourage you to utilize it to the maximum” the Mufti told Sheikh Lule.

He urged the Muslims of Kabale to rally behind their leaders, start income generating activities and to make sure that their children acquire both secular and Islamic knowledge. He called upon the newly sworn in district Kadhi of Kabale Muslim district to be a man of actions in his one year term. “We will be watching how much progress you have made on the ground not how much you have spoken” said the Mufti adding that it was the duty of the new district kadhi to unite not divide Muslims in Kabale. Earlier, during a press conference, the Mufti clarified that the retired district Kadhi of Kabale, Sheikh Ahmad Hassan Bujara could no longer serve as the district Kadhi.KABALE2

The Chairman of Kabale Muslim District Council, Mr. Issa Tindyebwa informed the Mufti that in terms of education, Muslims in kabale were still lagging behind with only one Muslim founded secondary school and three primary schools. The chairman requested the Mufti to give a helping hand to which the Mufti accepted.

In his remarks, the new district Kadhi Sheikh Kaabu Lule thanked his predecessor for serving Islam and pledged to promote education in the district and to fight all forms of immorality including child sacrifice, drug abuse and homosexuality among others. He promised to work hand in hand with other religious denominations and the government of Uganda in promoting development programs.

Signed
Haji Nsereko Mutumba
PRO UMSC
+256772409504/0701409504
Email: pro_umsc@yahoo.com

Draft amended UMSC Constitution by the Joint Muslim Committee

Standard

Asalaam Aleikum,

Please be pleased to note that The Joint Presidential Committee on Muslim affairs was mandated to among other things find lasting solutions to the perennial conflicts amongst the Ugandan Muslims. You among many other key informants interviewed by the Committee submitted that the constitution of UMSC was the major source of the conflicts and slow pace of progress amongst the Ugandan Muslims. The Committee therefore tasked one of its members brother Faisal Mukasa (who had already been selected by the Executive Committee of UMSC and confirmed by the Mufti on The Constitutional Review Committee headed by Brother Mudilikati Mukasa, but which committee never did the job due to lack of approval of the terms of reference by the UMSC)with the big task of reviewing the current UMSC constitution in view of the many complaints the committee’s key informants have made against the said constitution and recommend areas that need amendment, albeit come up with a zero draft of a new UMSC constitution if necessary, which will form part of the findings and recommendations of the committee for a lasting solution to the problems faced by the Muslims of Uganda.

Brother Faisal proceeded to review the current constitution, carried out research, consulted several Muslims, including the leaders at all levels, scholars In Islam and other fields on a number of areas the different key informants recommended as inappropriate or inadequate and has come up with a number of proposals in that regard.

It is brother Faisal’s wish and proposal to widen the consultations, and currently a number of Isalmic Scholars, Muslim Lawyers, and other elites in the Ummah are receiving the same proposals as sent to you for comments and input. The process is expected to result into a draft constitution proposed by the Committee as part of its report, for discussion by the Muslim Plenary that will be summoned once the Committee Report is received by H.E The President.

The Committee has a tentative meeting with The President fixed for 21 days from today, and would wish to receive your proposals in time for consideration and possible inclusion in the final text.

Please note that the final drafting is not yet done, therefore, do not mind the typographical errors but you could point them out. What is most important is that you as one of the Muslim elites puts thought to how the Muslims in Uganda can get out of their current seeming stagnation, increase the propagation of Islam in Uganda, prosper and be the community Islam expects them to be. There is concurrence that this can only be achieved with a constitution that enables the same to happen. Who will review and improve the UMSC Constitution to such a level? If it is the Muslims themselves, who are these Muslims if you are not one of them? If you are one of them, what are we waiting for to have the proper ideas in place and possibly adopt a new order? Shouldn’t you play your part as Allah expects by expressly being on record on this issue?

The answers to above questions have led us to choosing you as one of the people we should hear from on the topic of what the UMSC constitution should look and read like.

If you know any person that will be resourceful in this task please avail us their contacts and if possible their email addresses or forward the documents to enable us receive his/her input.

Please note that the document with tracked changes indicate the areas brother Faisal proposes to affect in the current constitution and how this could be done. The black words are those retained, the crossed are those deleted, and the red and underlined are those added.

On the side are explanatory notes and justifications for the proposed changes. These side notes have been extracted and summarized and emailed to you as a separate document for ease of reference and the draft Constitution as would look like if all his proposals were adopted has also been sent as a separate document.

The documents are herewith attached and sent to you for action and the committee eagerly awaits your comments and input.

coments of the const

UMSC CONSTITUTION 15-12-12

umsc final cons

Yours Sincerely,
NULU MUHAMMED

Joint Muslim Committee Secretary

Stop Pestering the Kabwegyere Committee – Nadduli

Standard

Uganda Muslim Supreme Council
News – Dec 27, 2012

nadduliThe Vice Chairman Uganda Muslim Supreme Council Haji Abdul Nadduli has spoken out against a clique of Muslims leaders who are pestering the “Kabwegyere Committee” to make pronouncements that are even beyond its mandate.

Haji Nadduli was speaking during the annual Mauledi organised by the ‘Khalifas’ of Uganda at the UMSC Headquarters – Gaddafi National Mosque Old Kampala on Wednesday December 26.

He called upon Muslim leaders to focus on developmental and unifying issues instead of being at the forefront of plotting mosque takeovers and making irresponsible statements. Speaking specifically about the Kabwegyere Committee, Nadduli said it is absurd to for some individuals to ask the committee to do or say something that is outside its mandate.

“The work of the committee is to gather information about the underlying causes of the Muslim wrangles, not to make pronouncements as some people are making the public to believe” said the UMSC Vice Chairman who has already made his submissions to the committee.

Haji Nadduli asked all Muslims to unite under the umbrella of UMSC whose headquarters are at Old Kampala saying that unlike Kibuli, Wandegeya and Kawempe among others that are meant for specific groups of people or families, UMSC at Old Kampala was created to unite all Muslims in Uganda irrespective of their tribes and heritage.

“I therefore pity those who think that they can just come and grab Old Kampala” said the chairman adding that any act of takeover is against the UMSC constitution and will be resisted and defeated by all Ugandan Muslims.

On his side, the UMSC Secretary General Eng. Sheikh Siraje Zaidi Kavuma stressed the importance and role of the UMSC structures which flow from the grassroots mosques to the UMSC headquarters. He appealed to the Muslim leaders at all levels to initiate and implement development programs since they have the mandate to do so.

The Mauled was organised in appreciation of the appointment of Sheikh Muhammad Yiga as the new district Kadhi of Kampala. Sheikh Muhammad Yiga has hitherto been the chairman of the Khalifas of Uganda.

The Mauledi was also attended by the Deputy Mufti of Uganda H.E. Sheikh Abdul-Hayyi Mukiibi, Sheikh Ssesimba Anas the Head of Islamic ceremonies; district Kadhis from various Muslim districts and members of UMSC General Assembly among others.

Information Officer
Public Relations Officer’s Office
Tel: 0772409504 or 0701409504 or 0712409504
Email: pro_umsc@yahoo.com

Joint Muslim Committee questionnaire guide For all Uganda Muslims to Answer

Standard

Salaam Aleikum,

The Joint Muslim Committee(JMC) is a Committee that was set up by the President of Uganda to investigate causes and find solutions to the perennial wrangles among the Muslims in Uganda.The Joint Muslim Committee would like to take this opportunity to get views regarding Muslim problems in Uganda from the Muslim brothers and sisters on the UMBS platform. So they have come up with questions below they would like members of UMBS to respond to such that we find a way forward to the problems in the Muslim community in Uganda.

The Members of the Committee are:


Government Representatives

i. Prof. Tarsis B Kabwegyere – Chairman

ii. Hon. Isaac I Musumba – Member

iii. Assoc Prof. Yasin Olum (PhD) – Member

Kibuli Representatives

i.Sheikh Hassan Kirya – Member

ii. Mr. Muhammad Kisambira – Member

111- Mr. Faisal Mukasa – Member

Uganda Muslim Supreme Council (UMSC) Representatives

i. Dr Edris S Kasenene – Member

ii.Hajj Sulayiman Musana – Member

iii.Sheikh Anasi Ssesimba – Member
———————————————————————————————————————


Leadership wrangles

There are leadership wrangles in the Muslim Community
1. What are the causes of perennial leadership wrangles in the Muslim Community in Uganda
2. In your opinion what is the solution to this problem

Property wrangles

There are property wrangles in the Muslim Community
• What in your view are the causes of these wrangles and what do you think is the impact of such wrangles on the Muslim unity
• What solutions do you propose
• What mechanism do you propose to avoid a re-occurrence of such problems

Governance

There exists Uganda Muslim Supreme Council that was established in 1972 to manage the affairs of the Muslim Community in Uganda
• In your opinion has the UMSC been run and managed properly, efficiently and effectively
• If not what do you propose should be done to improve the way UMSC is run and managed


Emerging groups

In the recent past there have emerged a number of divergent Muslim groups in the Muslim Community in Uganda
• What in your opinion is the cause of this development and how does it affect the Muslim Unity
• What do you propose as a way forward on this issue


Mbogo family

It is recognized that the Mbogo family (Nooh Mbogo) has greatly contributed immensely to the advancement of Islam. However, it has been said to the Committee that the family has to some extent contributed to the disunity among the Muslims in Uganda what is your opinion about their role.

UMSC Constitution

The UMSC has a Constitution
It has been said to the Committee that the Constitution needs to be amended, what is your opinion on this Constitution

Government involvement

Time and again Government has involved its self in the running of Muslim Affairs.
• In your opinion what impact has this had on Muslim unity in Uganda
• What do you propose to be the way forward

International Government/NGO’s Involvement

Time and again International Government/NGO’s have involved themselves in the running of Muslim Affairs.
• In your opinion what impact has this had on Muslim unity in Uganda
• What do you propose to be the way forward

Mufti/s and Christian leaders Should have a joint press conference condemning the Assasination of Muslim Clerics and Businessmen

Standard

Folks,
If you ask me, I would say it is ridiculous not to allow Muslim clerics and businessmen to own guns just because they are Muslims. The serial killer/s are targeting Muslim businessmen and clerics and they are killed when they cannot fight back, which is so wrong.

My point is that the government or Gen. Kayihura is giving the criminals or serial killers a monopoly on the means of violence because ordinary citizens can’t be trusted not to shoot each other right and left. Ordinary citizens did not put 6 holes in Sheikh Yunus or Sheikh Sekimpi and others, but it was serial killers: “the only ones who can be trusted with guns” did that.

Yes, there are real tragedies of gun ownership that the government may be afraid to run amok: the accidental shootings, cross fires and crimes of passion, but come on: if the government cannot protect Muslim leaders by providing them 24/7 security then they need to allow them to protect themselves.
What’s irrational is some people in the government thinking criminals/serial killers are going to obey the law. Criminals break laws! Guns are what make criminals potent. Guns are also what make their victims free. Criminals are NEVER going to disarm. The fact that practically Muslim clerics and businessmen will be armed, practically all the time, means that even if a criminal or nut case has a gun, he won’t be able to do much with it. Anyone who tried to use a gun offensively there would be dead in about two seconds. The problem with guns in society is not with the law abiding citizen. It is with the criminal.

So, I have yet to hear a cogent, intelligent, explanation on why General Kayihura wouldn’t allow Muslim leaders to protect themselves with guns. If not, the Uganda government needs to start giving 24/7 security to Muslim clerics , at least to show us that they have got all the intentions of protecting them, rather than leaving them totally exposed to their enemies( assuming it is not the state killing them).

This democracy in Uganda seems to favour certain groups of people, and that is unacceptable. Well, as one of the founding fathers of USA, Benjamin Franklin, 1759, stated: “Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.” I will leave that for those in government to interpret but they should not leave the Muslims to the wolves just because they are a minority in the country.

Everyone should be given a chance to live to 100 years such that they receive a Telegram from the queen of England wishing them a ‘happy birthday’. It is not nice for someone to kill you, as my father was, when you cannot defend yourself at all. If someone is using a gun to shoot at you, you should be in position to shoot back at them. No messing about!!!

If someone is shooting at the clerics, they should be in position to shoot back to protect themselves. Yes, an eye for an eye is not good as it means all of us will end up being blind, but it looks like the clerics have been left in the tigers den on their own- no protection at all. The state should allow them to possess guns to protect themselves. Yes, they need to shoot back to whoever is trying to shoot at them- I’m not joking!!

But if clerics are being killed in Kenya too, then this becomes an international concern that probably needs to be addressed to International authorities.

Muslims in Uganda should not keep quiet waiting for some miracle to save them. They need to save themselves, and if the government cannot provide security to the Muslim clerics, it’s high time they start thinking of providing security to themselves, e.g. hiring body guards; legally owning guns, being home before 20:00, …………..

I would say this is the time the Muslim community need to stand together to face the enemy. If anybody has intentions of eliminating any of us, we should stand shoulder to shoulder to defend ourselves, and we should speak with one voice.

If our Non-Muslim friends wish to be part of us, they should issue a statement in the media condemning the acts of murder going on in the community. Our Mufti/s should organize a joint conference with their Christian counterparts to condemn what is going on at the moment. The silence from both group leaders is killing me, totally killing me, brother.

There is nothing important for Muslims now as their lives. Without life, there is nothing to lead. A dead Muslim does not have any leader on earth apart from his or her Allah. Muslim leaders in Kampala should take this issue very seriously and do something about it. Actually, they should all make applications to the police asking for guns to protect themselves. When the government refuse their applications, they should display this to the media to show that the government is not ready to allow them to protect themselves.

Muslim leaders should all be writing to: UN, African Union, International Islamic Conference, world Muslim League, IMF, World Bank and other international organizations informing them about the murders in East Africa. Muslim MPs should be addressing this issue in parliament. Those in cabinet should make it an issue in cabinet sessions.

Lives of the Muslims or the people they lead and the led, is at stake here. Anyone who comes out to start politicizing this issue should be looked at as bluffing.


Nze bwendaba banange

Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba
————————————————————–
Stalk my blog at: http://semuwemba.com/

Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/semuwemba

Follow UAH at: http://ugandansatheart.org/

Hon. Hussein Kyanjo Sends His Greetings to Muslims and all Ugandans from Dubai

Standard

HON. HUSSEIN KYANJO  is among the few Muslims in parliament

HON. HUSSEIN KYANJO is among the few Muslims in parliament

Assalam Alaikum dear brothers and sisters, Ramadhan Karim and Eid Mubarak InshAllah, I am still struggling with my health, truly it is not pleasant but it is not life threatening, with consistent prayers I will be fine mashAllah. Kati ndiko bulungi newandibadde nga nkyatuddeyo ebbanga ariwera. The Dr insists that I should be near him because every visit I make to the Dr, he changes the dose after measuring the state of my recovery.

IUIU PROBLEMS AND RESPONSE TO PROF. MUKWANASON HYUHA

I have carefully gone through the message Hyuha sent to UMBS. Since this saga erupted I have resisted making comments because honestly I am down with serious health complications and not so close to this issue.

I’m therefore writing not to thank Mr.Mukwanason for the content of his mail but rather the civilised way he presented it.

About Shekh Muzaata: It seems many people do not understand Muzaata the way I do. if you visited Butabika hospital on a public holiday and find a health worker in a casual dress, you will take the image that the person you have seen is also mad because of the way he acted towards the patients in that hospital.
I am sure when Sheikh Muzaata goes home he reflects on his words and let me tell you he feels that pain of doing a dirty job but the dilemma he finds himself in is the absence of any other option to which he would gladly belong as a member.

Because of the mad nature of some of the actions by some Muslim leaders, accompanied by no visible sanctions, Muzaata fills in that gap as a mad man. In fact the reasons given to criticise him are the same reason I painfully accept his way. Honestly Muzaata is just doing what many of us cannot do.

Let us pray that the dust settles then we shall sit down and correct each other in a normal way rather than looking at big Sheikhs acting erroneously and we all fear to boldly confront them and instead discourage those who have the courage we lack to do it. Let our leaders stop bad behaviour Muzaata will instantly stop mad action.I hope you read the Tarekh of the actions of Saidina Umar which were often regarded as mad actions.

ISLAMIC BANKING

I have had the news regarding the issue of Islamic Banking and the words of Dr. Museveni indicating his willingness to learn more from the sheikhs how this system works and also to direct what he called his team to look into the matter.

All the above sounds flowery but it is not easy to happen during the rule of Dr. Museveni because I think he either forgot or he was simply duping the Muslims. Dr. Museveni knows all too well what the concept is all about. I am suspicious that his intelligence informed him about a group of Ugandans who launched this project in Uganda led by Haj Isa Lukwago formerly from Bank of Uganda through a company called MIDSOC, it was formally registered and had started preliminary operations as a forex bureau on Nkrumah Road here in Kampala.

I also think that Dr. Museven most likely received a brief at least from his Prime Minister Mr. Mbabazi, Governor Mutebire or some other member of his confidant team that through their National Bank of Commerce had brokered a deal with one Abudhabi Islamic Bank to start Islamic Banking in Uganda. It could even be true that Dr. Museveni met with the representative of the said Abudhabi Bank called Ahmed Darwish who has been to Uganda more than once to enhance this project but in vain. I personally met Ahmed Darwish more than three times and never missed to caution him about the nature of the human beings he was dealing with. The last I heard about the project was that the money injected into the National Bank of Commerce had been lent to Mr. Amos Nzei and that following economic pot holes Nzei did not perform well and that there was a proposal by Dr. Mutebire advising the Bank of Commerce to write off the debt from Nzei and consider it as a bad one.

It is against this back ground that I welcome the new initiative but with dark glasses because I think the leader of our republic is not one who forgets so quickly to convince me that he did not know enough about Islamic Banking.

Let us watch the two sides mine and that of those who believed the Commander in Chief is sincere this time around.

Meanwhile concentrate on your normal business do not waste your quality time on a clever story which has been crafted to divert you from other achievable

MUSLIMS MISSING OUT ON GOVT POSITIONS

I am trying to discourage you from turning privileges into rights. All the appointments you see in Government are not a matter of right they are either privileges or favours you should stop crying for them. Instead take your children to school, be honest people and work hard the rest will work out naturally.

I know of a country where individuals are requested to join government and many times they either refuse or agree on a time line within which to serve normally 2 to 4 years and in this country things are moving so smoothly and pretty fast. Kindly let Dr. Museveni do his assignments his own way, the day honest and just people will come to power EVEN IF THEY ARE NONE MUSLIMS they will realign the nation but not now.
Did you know how many military helicopters Uganda had? But now you know it owned a few and that some have sadly been lost with Ugandans of hidden names perishing. There are thousands of things you are not aware about and that is why you do not cry for them. Strangely they are more vital than the positions you are clamouring for.

Kindly follow up on our rights forget privileges and favours the leader in power deliberately hates you do not bother him with your cries.

What I mean is that there are people who are naturally unfair they thrive on creating patronage not fair distribution. During times of rule by such individuals you don’t ask them to be fair to you. They do not know it in their language but there is a window which forces them to do what must be done.

Take an example of people like myself, kasolo of kyotera, Yahaya Gudoi of Mbale Fungaro of koboko, Huda of Yumbe, Hood Katuramu, Sulaiman Balyejjusa of kamuli erias Lukwago of Kabungo even the fairy known like Latif Ssebagala or Nsereko Muhammad, just for a mention were not favoured but they squeezed themselves into positions of critical responsibility by the power of their people.

You remember the story ofHajji Kaddunabbi(Butamabala), when elections became muddy in his constituency he entered the lane of turbo engine vehicles and in the end he qualified as a senior racer not by favour but by the strength of ijtihad.

Take the broader angle of all religions. Do you think Najjemba Muyinda was given a favour, Rose Mamayanja or Nantaba never mind the tittle Hon; these are silently powerful individuals who tie the hands of the Ssabagabe and he fixes them by the force of fear and this force is fully supported by their own people?
Even the Speaker of Parliament today, the beloved Kadaaga, was not favoured to become one not even at constituency level and you still can see the way she is fighting her lame handed opponents. The list is long of self-propelling people: Nandala, Alaso, Namboze, Ssemuju, Wamai, Tana, Amriat etc are not there by favour but by force.

When Muslims learn to venture into positions as clear nationalists, they will legitimately occupy offices and because they are commanded by Allah to be just and fair then they will establish equity; Otherwise the idea of crying to someone who ate poor people’s cows during the war and the best he can do today is to send them to micro finance institutions to borrow money instead of paying them back.
It is no longer a matter of Muslim vs grabbing, there are Muslims occupying quality Christian offices just cross Kampala road and enter Centenary Bank, why because the owners of the Institution are fair human beings.

Massalam

Hajji Hussein Kyanjo
UMBS member in Dubai

REMARKS ON THE IUIU MISINFORMATION AND ON DISCUSSIONS ON GOVERNMENT APPOINTEES TO THE IUIU COUNCIL

Standard

 

By

 

Mukwanason A. Hyuha

Professor of Economics

 

 

During the last few months, a lot of write-ups have come out in the media and via the UMBS website on the issue of the appointment by Government of Prof. Hyuha and Mr. Mahiri Balunywa to the membership of the IUIU Council. The write-ups included an advertiser’s article that was published in local newspapers. These write-ups contain a lot of misinformation, deliberate lies, distortions and half-truths. The purpose of this short paper is to inform the uninformed and the misinformed as well as to provide the correct information and truths.

 

  1. 1.       Smear Campaign against Hyuha and Balunywa, Round 1

Nusura Tiperu, Mahiri Balunywa and I were appointed to the IUIU Council and did receive the required appointment letters on March 27, 2012. The letters were copied to, inter alia, the Chairman of the Council and the Rector of IUIU (Dr. Sengendo). Various activities took place following these appointments.  It is now known that the IUIU administration in Mbale had ‘excited’ discussions on the matter that culminated in the dispatch of one former colleague and student of mine in Makerere University to Kampala to start off the smear campaign. The campaign took the following forms:

  1. Speeches in mosques in Kampala on Friday, March 30, 2012. The gist of these speeches by Sheikh Muzata Batte, Sheikh Hassan Khirya and others in general was as follows:
  • That President Museveni wants to “kill” IUIU like he did to Greenland Bank.
  • That the President is using General Moses Ali, Hon. Asumani Kiyingi, Hyuha and Mahiri to attain his objective of ‘killing’ the IUIU.
  • That Hyuha and Mahiri are actually not Muslims; hence, they should have not been appointed to the IUIU Council. These Muslim brothers had not even read through the Act of Parliament that established the IUIU, which, inter alia, states (Article 11(b)) that “five persons appointed by the Government of Uganda” (not “five Muslims appointed by the Government of Uganda”!)
  • That the Government should have replaced 2, rather than 3, of its appointees. This showed ignorance of Article 12(2) of the Act which states that “… the Government … may replace… any two …” of its appointees every two years. In law, there is a big difference between the word “may” and the word “shall”; the former introduces discretion while the latter means “must”. Hence, this section does not compel Government to act as stated:  it may or may not. So, Governmet’s action is duly legal.
  • That Hyuha and Mahiri are a bad pair with a bad history. Again, as will be shown below, this was exposure of one’s ignorance in broad day light!
  1. More speeches in (only) Kampala mosques on April 6, 2012. (None outside Buganda.) These speeches this time were focussed exclusively on Hyuha and Mahiri.
  1. At least one speech by Sheikh Muzata Batte at a funeral in the Central Region, again on Hyuha and Mahiri. A lot of derogatory utterings were spewed out by the sheikh.
  1. A discussion of some IUIU alumni (so they claimed) on Bukedde TV’s Akabbinkano talk show:  again castigating the appointment of Hyuha and Mahiri in a derogatory manner. These ‘alumni’ even claimed that Government had promised to rescind the appointment of the two ‘evil’ characters!

1.1   Response/Reactions from Hyuha and Balunywa

As I have always taken it as one of my duties since my student life “to inform the uninformed and/or the misinformed, including the ignorant”, I did invite Sheikh Hassan Khirya to have a discussion over the matter. The meeting took place in Kampala, and Mahiri also attended this meeting. Like me, the sheikh had been a member of the General Assembly and the Executive Committee of UMSC since 2000. Did he believe that I am not a Muslim? Anyway, he appeared to know the truth. His problem was Mahiri’s dossiers concerning Sengendo’s mismanagement of IUIU. The two (the sheikh and Mahiri) had what I thought was a fruitful discussion and Mahiri promised to send (and did send) soft copies of the dossiers to the sheikh. Despite this, the mosques talks, in (only) Kampala mosques, continued the next Friday (April 6, 2012)!

I also talked to a long-time friend of mine, Hajji Ibrahim Matovu (Headmaster of Kibuli SS) on the matter. I met Hajji Matovu at a funeral in Kachongha, Butaleja District. The gist of the discussion was “Why should Muslims wash their dirty linen in public?” We seemed to be singing the same song. Next, I also attempted, together with Mahiri, to meet Jajja w’Obusiraamu mu Uganda (Prince Kassim Nakibinge) to discuss the issues, but in vain

Thereafter, I sent a write-up to the Observer newspaper on the issue, since the misinformation, lies and distortions on Mahiri and me were still continuing. I also sent the write-up and my c.v. to Abbey Semuwemba in this process of “informing the uninformed and the misinformed”. Brother Mahiri also came up with a write-up which he circulated over the internet.

You can see that our “splashing of curriculum vitae (cvs)” and write-ups in the media and on the internet came about two weeks after ‘shuttle diplomacy’ had failed. The attacks were still continuing, and nobody was appealing to the Muzata Battes and Khiryas of this world not to wash Muslim dirty linen in public. Is it possible that Brother Semuwemba had not come across or heard about the mosque and funeral as well as the Akabbinkano barrages of lies, character-assassinations and misinformation on Hyuha and Mahiri until I ‘splashed’ my cv on the internet?

  1. 2.       Smear Campaign against Hyuha and Balunywa, Round 2

A second round of the smear campaign soon followed the first one. This included the following:

  1. An advertiser’s article by an IUIU spokesman appeared in several newspapers. This article was meant to show how bad or un-muslim Hyuha and Mahiri are. For Mahiri, it was based on his dossiers on Sengendo (not IUIU,which he cherishes up to now) which came out some time back; and for Hyuha, the article was based on concocted allegations (stress allegations) made in a non-scientific report by an illegal committee set up by the then Makerere University Vice Chancellor and kangaroo courts that followed the report. The article appears to have achieved its main objective of spreading lies, distortions and misinformation and half-truths. For example, one sister plus a Fazhil Mwesigwa appear to believe in every printed word, although they may most likely not believe in the Bible the way it is now. I will return to this misinformation based on the Makerere saga later.
  1. Prof. Abdu B. Kasozi wrote to the Minister of Education and Sports on this matter—in a way urging her to reject the Government appointment of Hyuha. Prof. Kasozi is the current Executive Director of the National Council for Higher Education (NCHE), which, inter alia, supervises universities and ensures that quality programmes, teaching, research and outreach are the order of the day at all (private and public) universities in Uganda. This oversight and quality assurance role, however, does not include advising on compositions of university councils! That is, appointment of university administrators, composition of university councils, membership of the university councils and their committees, and similar matters are completely outside the the mandate of the NCHE. The Universities and Other Tertiary Institutions Act and charters of various universities deal with these issues. Note that:
  • First, Prof. Kasozi kept quiet when, in 2010, Hyuha was appointed to the post of Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic Affairs) of Kampala International University (KIU), which is under the NCHE.
  • Second, the professor also kept quiet when Hyuha was appointed a member of the Council of KIU.
  • Third, he has kept quiet with regard to the low academic standards, the absence of professors and the paucity of research at the IUIU.
  • The third one is part of his ‘cup of tea’—so to speak—as an NCHE director, but the first two are none of his business! Yet, he was able to write on the composition of IUIU’s Council (stress outside his mandate), but continues to keep tight-lipped on the IUIU issues (bullet 3) directly under his mandate. Was his writing to the Minister without a hidden agenda? Anyway, a former IUIU Guild President (Brother Shafique Sabila) exhaustively discussed this issue; I have nothing to add.
  1. The administration of IUIU organized various meetings in Mbale and Kampala involving IUIU students, members of staff and alumni, aimed at denouncing Hyuha and Mahiri. I am happy to report that some alumni, staff members and students resisted these actions. Apart from a student appearing on a radio talk show, nothing ‘positive’ came out of these meetings—to the disappointment of the administration.
  1. Sengendo and his group made a number of derogatory remarks on Hyuha, Balunywa, Hon. Kiyingi and the Rt. Hon. General Moses Ali at various Ramandhan seminars and elsewhere. There are recorded versions of these speeches at the seminars as well as witnesses who attended the seminars.
  1. Feigning utter ignorance of the Act of Parliament that established the IUIU, Sengendo is reported to have stated at one of the seminars something like “Muslims rejected the appointment of Hyuha and Mahiri ….” Does the Act state that Government appointments to the Council shall be vetted by the Muslim Ummah in Uganda? Does it even state that these appointees shall be vetted by alumni, students, or members of staff? You can fool some people for some time, but you cannot fool all the people for all the time!

2.1   Response by Hyuha and Balunywa to the Second Round of the Campaign

 

Except for my paper presented to the Presidential Committee, neither Mahiri nor I have reacted to the second round of the smear campaign. Of course, as I pointed out above, Brother Sabila wrote something—copied to me, Mahiri, and a number of other brothers and sisters—on Prof. Kasozi’s action. In the interest of transparency, I presume, Shafique also gave a copy to the Professor of (Buganda?) History.

I am also compelled by circumstances to comment on some of the issues in Round 2 in this paper, But, the major aim of the paper is actually to throw more light on certain matters that have appeared on the UMBS website in the recent past.

  1. 3.       My Relationship with Dr. Sengendo

 

Dr. Sengendo has attracted a number of friends and enemies; I do not know whether the number of enemies is greater than that of friends. However, I have never counted myself among his enemies or ‘persons who don’t like him or his guts’. The truth of the matter is as follows:

 

  1. To the best of my knowledge and recollection, I have never ever clashed with Sengendo. This is as true as truth itself.
  2. However, I was present in 1992 when he clashed with the late Hajji Mustapha Muluya (then an IUIU employee) and the late Dr. Salim Bachou (a Minister of State then) in the presence of the late James Wapakhabulo (also then Minister).  This was at the Mbale campus during the 4th anniversary of the opening of IUIU. This ceremony was marked with reviews and speeches, like previous ceremonies. The cause of the clash was a statement in Sengendo’s speech to the effect that any Ugandan Muslim who was a Professor was actually a Muganda; no Muslim professors outside Buganda. Mustapha and Salim bitterly, and with considerable emotion, contested this allegation. It appears that due to this clash, no more anniversary ceremonies were ever held.
  3. Dr. Sengendo applied for promotion to the rank of senior lecturer when I was a member of the IUIU Appointments and Disciplinary Committee in the mid-1990s.  On purely academic grounds, I vehemently opposed this promotion for he had no publications in his area of specialization worth talking about, although he had some writings outside his area of specialisation. He was not promoted then.
  4. Even in my various writings and speeches at various functions, I have never talked about his nature and type of management or mismanagement of IUIU (whichever is applicable).  This is the information I relayed to Brother Ibrahim Matovu when we met at a funeral. Of course, in the paper presented to the Presidential Committee, I made mention of him.

Hence, I have been as neutral as anybody else vis-à-vis Sengendo’s management or mismanagement of IUIU.  Maybe, for him because I was a close friend of both Muluya and Bachou and I successfully opposed his promotion, albeit on purely academic considerations, I automatically became an enemy of his. I insist I am not. It is the Shaban Kalemas, Fazhils and Abbeys of this world to produce counter evidence.

Nonetheless, I am not unaware or ignorant of the academic status of IUIU, for

  1. There is no professor in a university that became operational in 1988.  It appears that no professor can live there for a long time.  It appears that any professor there will sooner than later be antagonized by Sengendo and his administration, and, hence, be forced to leave IUIU unceremoniously. I gave examples of this to the Presidential Committee.
  2. Even persons holding PhD degrees are an endangered species, for soon or later they will be frustrated and will leave the university.
  3. Hardly any research is going on at IUIU.  The main difference between a primary, secondary or any other non-university tertiary institution is research. Research is the extension of frontiers of knowledge (i.e the generation and addition to knowledge).  Consequently, a university cannot be a university if it is not producing academic reports. academic papers, articles in recognized/reputable academic journals, academic books and other end-products of research.   Without research output, the ‘university’ is actually a glorified secondary school—as I stated at the said 4th anniversary ceremony and elsewhere thereafter. Ranking of universities is also mainly based on research output, not buildings or arrogance, although teaching space and facilities are taken into account. These are facts and attributes all should understand.
  4. IUIU has very beautiful buildings, thanks to Sengendo and his administration who participated in the mobilization of resources from our Muslim brothers overseas. But buildings alone do not make a university, for even some secondary schools have similarly beautiful buildings. Lugazi University collapsed despite its beautiful buildings.

I am an economist. Therefore, to be promoted to any higher academic rank (this does not apply in my case since I am already a full professor, but assume it applied), I need publications in recognized publication avenues in Economics, not in political science, nuclear physics, sociology, metaphysics, Islam or any other field.  If I authored famous works—like Things Fall Apart, Grapes of Wrath, Petals of Blood, The World is Flat, Song of Lawino, Julius Caesar, How Europe Underdeveloped Africa, Das Capital Volumes I & II, The Wretched of the Earth, Introduction to Biology, History of Africa South of the Sahara, and so on—I would never ever be promoted to any academic rank in Economics (for these are not recognised academic publications in Economics, although they are very good academic works).  This is the fact; you either publish in your area of specialisation or perish).

Due to the absence of professors and other senior academicians in IUIU, the academic standards are low.  External examiners’ reports I have looked at bring out this fact.  Note that this was not the case before the Sengendo regime.  For example, when I was an external examiner in Economics in the 1990s, standards were then high at the IUIU.

Of course, the absence of senior academicians at the IUIU has impacted negatively on research and teaching/delivery standards at the university. Whereas Makerere University is ranked 8th in Africa, IUIU does not appear even among the first 100 universities! ‘Why?’, anybody can ask.

Whoever doubts what I have stated on the importance of research in a university can check with other senior academics, e.g. Prof. Abbas Kiyimba who I did assist during his PhD era.

4.   A word on My Previous Comments on Sheikh Muzata Batte

As a member of the UMSC General Assembly and Executive Committee, I got to know Sheikh Muzata Batte. I respect him and admire him for his religious training. But I do not respect him for his secular education; neither do I admire or respect him for his misguided eloquence. He is being used by others—given his eloquence and theatrics—to comment on issues he is not conversant with (to put it mildly). The IUIU administration and Council are a case in point. He is not the type I would consult on any university issues, just like I am not the type one should consult on issues to do with nuclear physics, or metaphysics, or organic and inorganic chemistry, and so on. I am only competent to a large degree in Economics as well as administration of tertiary academic/education institutions and programmes.

As a result, I would never consult the Muzata Battes of this or other terrestrial planets on the issue of how to run a university, or the cardinal functions of a university. These Battes just have scanty knowledge or information on these issues. So, here, I agree to disagree with Semuwemba and his likes. Even in my case, never trust me with academic issues outside Economics, such as metaphysics, psychology, sociology, engineering, human or veterinary medicine, etc. If I was given the duty to run mosques, maddrassas and similar Islamic institutions, I would definitely consult the sheikh, just like I expect him to consult me on issues to do with Economics, administration of tertiary education institutions, and the like. Let’s not assume that everybody is a jack of all trades! Everybody should know his/her strengths and weaknesses. I would not consult everybody on certain complex issues, just for the sake of being seen to be democratic.

Hence, Brother Abbey, frankly and honestly, I would not seek Batte’s opinion on how to run a university. A few people confuse the Council of a university, whose members are actually part-time, with the administration of a university (which runs a university on a day-to-day basis). University Council membership is not a job; it is a part-time occupation. I am currently not looking for a job! However, Fazhil thinks I am unemployed. He thinks I am looking for a job. He thinks I envy Sengendo who has a job and I don’t have one; maybe he thinks I want to take Sengendo’s job. There is a big difference between us Economists and Accountants. Ask anybody knowledgeable and you will see what I mean. But let this be a topic for another day.

5.   The Word ‘Lumpen’ and My Style of Communication

First, for those familiar with the works of Karl Marx, Lenin, Mao Tsetung and other Marxists, the word ‘lumpen’ (proletariat) is as opposed to ‘bourgeoisie’. The lumpens are the working, exploited class, while the bourgeoisie are the rich class that exploits the lumpen proletariat. I used this word in that context. The lecturers at IUIU, being mainly junior academicians, are exploited by the administration. I am told that to get a scholarship, for example, one has to provide manual and other types of labour to the Rector and his administration!

I did not definitely mean to be derogatory to the IUIU lecturers who are working under very difficult conditions. If one understood my use of the word otherwise, my sincere apologies.

Second, I am a person who calls a spade a spade—nothing else. That is why I was as blunt as possible in my presentation to the Presidential Committee; I touched areas many people agree to, but never discuss or mention, particularly in public. Brother Abbey, that is me; I cannot ‘bake’ words. This frankness, rigidness, or bluntness has earned me friends and enemies. Sometimes, I am referred to as arrogant, or rude, or undiplomatic, but that is me; that is my communication style, which I am profusely proud of. After all, one man’s meat is another man’s poison.

6.   The Makerere Saga, 2000

The post of Academic Registrar for Makerere University was widely advertised in the newspapers by the University Secretary. Following the adverts, I applied and was invited for interview in early 1993. Thereafter, the university forwarded my name to the Minister of Education and Sports; and I was appointed by the then Minister of Education and Sports, Major Nuwe Amanya Mushega, as the Academic Registrar of Makerere University on 12th May, 1993. I reported for work on 14th May, 1993.

Note that a few days after the authorities in Makerere University had agreed that I be appointed as the Academic Registrar and had, hence, forwarded the recommendation to the Minister to that effect, a delegation was sent to the Minister to urge him not to effect the appointment. The delegation was led by the then Vice Chancellor, the late Prof. William Senteza Kajubi. They tried to convince the Minister that if he appointed me, I was not likely to turn up since the salary for the post was too low, compared to what I was earning as Macroeconomic and Financial Advisor to the Government of Uganda. The Minister had attentively listened to them, and, thereafter, invited me for a chat. The invitation was relayed through Mr. Emmanuel Tumusiime Mutebile, then Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, where I was based as an Advisor to the Government. This story is nothing but the truth: it was narrated by the Minister during his speech as Guest of Honour at a function in the University Main Hall, organised by Makerere University to welcome me officially and to officially bid farewell to Mr. Bernard Onyango, the previous Academic Registrar. The said Vice Chancellor and his team were present during the Minister’s frank narration.

The Vice Chancellor and his team cannot have hastily run to the Minister to block my appointment just because they thought I was not going to accept a lower salary. They must have had a hidden agenda; after all, during the interview, they had asked me about the issue, and I had assured them that, if offered the job, I would take it up. Maybe, they had now discovered that I was/am a Muslim, following my joint attendance (soon after the interview) of a graduation ceremony at the IUIU with Prof. Lutalo Bosa, the then Deputy Vice Chancellor, Makerere University. I attended the ceremony as a member of an IUIU Council Committee (the Appointments and Disciplinary Committee) and Prof. Lutalo Bosa attended as a representative of Makerere University. I strongly believe this was the actual reason—based on sectarian, rather than salary, considerations—especially so when one of the newspapers stated, during the saga in 2000, that “it was wrong to have appointed a non-pork eater as the Academic Registrar of Makerere University!”

Thereafter, some time in early 2000, the then Vice Chancellor hurriedly set up a so-called Committee of Inquiry to investigate allegations concocted against me by the then University Bursar and some of the staff in my Department. I was then in Arusha on official duty. It should be noted that:

  1. The Vice Chancellor was not courteous enough to inform me that he had set up such a committee. I learned of the existence of the committee when its chairman (Prof. Oswald Ndoleriire) came to my office to (verbally) invite me to meet the committee members for a chat.
  1. The Committee was unilaterally set up by the Vice Chancellor, rather than the Appointments Board. It was to bring its report to him as a result. This was illegal, since the Vice Chancellor or his informal Central Executive Committee (CEC) had no legal authority to set up such a committee (according to the Makerere University Act, 1970).
  1. 3.      The Vice Chancellor was illegally made a member of the Appointments Board, contrary to the provisions of the said University Act. Hence, in this case, he was going to (and he actually did) present a summary of the Committee’s report to the Appointments Board. He then participated in the decision to suspend me. Thus, he was both the accuser and the judge!

 

  1. All members of the Committee were my juniors, and, on several occasions, I had differed with most of them on various issues during the course of my academic and administrative activities at the university—given my strictness, frankness and transparency.
  1. The Committee members disagreed on the recommendation that I be suspended. On the second day, they had to ‘force’ the Committee Secretary to take part in voting; that is when 3 voted for me and 4 (including the secretary) voted against me.
  1. The report of the Committee left a lot to be desired, a fact I did point out to the Appointment Board  It was, for example, devoid of any scientific analysis, and full of outrageous sweeping statements.
  1. I was invited verbally to face the Committee. No ‘charges’ were ever given to me verbally or in writing before I attended the meeting. On arrival at the meeting, about 18 ‘charges’ were read to me. I was told to write them down, and, thereafter, immediayely give my reactions to each one of them.
  1. The same state of affairs—of no formal, written invitation, no written or verbal ‘charges’ prior to the meeting, no adequate time given for the accused to respond to ‘charges’, etc.—was repeated at the CEC meeting of 9th August, 2000, the Appointments Board meeting of 11th August, 2000, and similar meetings. I did write to the Appointments Board chairman pointing out these bizarre issues and anomalies. No reply was ever received from him.
  1. As stated in the previous point, all procedures and etiquette were violated at all levels in dealing with my case. For example, no formal charges were ever handed to me by the dubious Committee of Inquiry or the Appointments Board itself before I appeared before them. Instead, I had to endure a lot of harassment during these meetings.
  1. All business was conducted in a hurry; I was never given adequate time to prepare my defence. For example, I was just told by the Vice Chancellor verbally on 10th August, 2000, that I would appear before the Appointments Board the next day, 11th August, 2000.
  1. At the Central Executive Committee (CEC) meeting on 9th August, 2000, the ‘charges’ had miraculously been reduced to three, and at the Appointments Board meeting on 11th August, 2000, only 2 ‘charges’ were mentioned. Again, nobody was courteous enough to inform me why the ‘charges’ had been reduced from about 18 to just 3 then 2 (no verbal or written communication to me on this issue).

I was suspended immediately after the said ‘kangaroo courts’. These ‘courts’ violated all civilized norms and etiquettes of natural justice; it is obvious that the end justified the means. I knew the outcome of the ‘courts’; so, I took on a job with the AERC in Nairobi. Indeed, two years later, I received a letter terminating my services, with full benefits. It should be emphasized that I was not dismissed from the university. Instead, maybe for lack of any concrete evidence and given the way the so-called inquiry was conducted as well as the nature of the ‘courts’, my services were terminated with full benefits. There is a big difference between dismissal and termination; Brother Fazhil appears not to understand this! As I stated elsewhere, I have no criminal record arising out of this saga; I have already received the benefits.

By the way, the alleged ‘O’ level student was not an ‘O’ level student as some (like Shaban Kalema) would like to fool the public. The candidate had legally sat the Mature Age Entry Examinations and passed them. She had been admitted to the university on the basis of the Mature Age Entry exam results, rather than the forged documents (attached to the application form) needed under the Direct Entry Scheme (but irrelevant under the Mature Age Entry Scheme). The other candidate was admitted on the basis of ‘O’ and ‘A’ level exam results during my absence; it is one of my Deputy Registrars who I had left as Acting Academic Registrar who had signed his admission letter. This candidate’s results were not forged! It is Kings College Budo (his former school) that had issued him with incorrect (not forged) results which, in my absence, the university had used to admit him. Kings College Budo, in writing, accepted their error; and it is the candidate who alerted the university on this fact. My Deputy never told me about this issue; I first learned about it when it was one of the ‘charges’ at the CEC and the Appointments Board meetings!

Unfortunately, I am currently constrained to give more information on this saga. My lawyer has advised me to give out minimal information, as he is still looking at the possibility of court actions against those bent on spoiling my otherwise clean and excellent record and performance. I wrote two papers that were serialized in the Monitor newspaper in 2008. I am hereby informing the uninformed and the misinformed that they should read through these articles that appeared in March and April, 2008.

I may give more details on these concocted charges and the kangaroo courts once my lawyer and I have concluded on the course of action as regards this smear campaign.

Mukwanason A. Hyuha

Kampala City

August 26, 2012.

The cause of Muslim wrangles in Uganda – and the possible remedies

Standard

By BADRU KATEREGGA

Summary: For most of their 180-year history the Muslims of Uganda have been fighting each other. Remedies that fall short of replacing the community’s secular Constitution with a Sharia-based one, or fail to acknowledge the Buganda factor in leadership shall come to naught.

Author Biography: Badru Kateregga is Professor of Islamic Studies and Vice Chancellor of Kampala University.

Ugandan Muslims live with one another as brothers and sisters. They worship the same Allah and seek to be the people of God, yet they seldom listen to one another in matters of their leadership. As a Muslim it would be unreal of me not to be concerned with the incessant Muslim wrangles in the country.

Muslim wrangles have existed in Uganda and particularly in Buganda since Islam arrived around 1823 (Northern Uganda) and 1844 (Buganda) to the present day (August 2012). Of these 180 years of Islam in the East African country, 136 years have been characterized by conflicts and wrangles with short interludes of peace, unity and stability.

This intra-faith dispute was worsened by minor differences in the interpretation of the Qur’an and Hadith (teachings of the Prophet). The different approaches used in the spread of Islam created divisions in the Muslim community, for instance, the Ahmad ibn Ibrahim’s group that came from the East African Coast and arrived during the era of Kabaka Suuna II hardly agreed with the 1876 group of Muslims that came from Egypt and Sudan, as we shall elaborate later.

This clash led to the execution of about 200 Muslims at the orders of Kabaka Mutesa I, a so-called Muslim, who refereed to them as rebellious. He also expelled Muslims from the palace, sparing only his step brother, Nuhu Mbogo. This bloodbath produced the first batch of Muslim martyrs – the forgotten martyrs – slaughtered at Namugongo by Mukajanga who, 10 years later, also murdered Christians at the same place.

Causes of Muslim wrangles

The causes of Muslim conflicts in Uganda can be traced from the historical perspective to the current issues, and for purposes of this presentation I will articulate and document the causes in a chronological order.

The spread of Islam

First and foremost, the manner and method of the spread of Islam led to conflicts. Unlike Christianity that was spread by the missionaries, Islam was spread by traders on a voluntary basis, some of whom lacked knowledge. This disorganization has persisted to present day.

The misinterpretation and misunderstanding of the Quran by the sheikhs equally caused problems. For example, the Zanzibaris allowed the Kabaka (King of Buganda) to lead prayers as a sign of tolerance and respect even when he wasn’t circumcised (in Buganda tradition the body of the Kabaka isn’t supposed to shed blood). However, this was opposed by the Egyptian-Sudanese radicals who insisted that the Kabaka must be circumcised.

They also argued that the mosque of the monarch faced the wrong direction (not the direction of the Kaaba – Qibla). This sparked off the conflict that led to the slaughter of Muslims at Namugongo.

Arrival of Christianity

There was a short interval of 32 years between the advent of Islam and the arrival o Christian missionaries (the Church Missionary Society arrived in 1877 while the Roman Catholics came in 1879). Since the missionaries were the forerunners to colonialism, they worked hand in hand with the colonialists to hold back Islam at all levels, creating conflicts between the Muslims on the one hand and the imperialists and their agents on the other.

Matters became worse when the British colonial administration left the control of education – a tool for development – entirely in the hands of the Church. Thus the Muslims couldn’t send their children to school, which served as conversion centers. For instance, Yusuf Lule who converted to Christianity while at school remains a vivid example in Muslim minds.

The products of these colonial-aided missionary schools ended up taking all formal jobs, leaving their Muslim counterparts to live as third class citizens – choppers of wood, butchers and taxi drives. They had no skills to talk about. In this marginalized and disgruntled section of the population, there was bound be a social source of conflict.

The colonialists further gave land to the chiefs and missionaries, leaving out the Muslims. In the 1990 Buganda Agreement, the Muslims were allocated only one county – Butambala – which was very small and dry. This discrimination denied Muslims the source of wealth, socio-economic development and created socio-economic imbalances that gave rise to ill-feeling toward their countrymen and governments.

Besides, the colonialists found the Muslims divided and did nothing to unite them. The theological conflict between Badru Kakungulu and Sheikh Abdullah Ssekimwany, for instance, went on unabated. The colonialists said that their duty was to throw Islam back to the Sudan and they only tolerated it because they only found it here.

Post colonial era

The situation of Islam didn’t change appreciably during the post-colonial era since those who inherited power were products of the colonial-missionary system. They brought no dramatic changes in Muslim-Christian or Muslim-government relations.

The NAAM versus Kibuli in 1965

A group of Muslim elite supported by the Uganda Peoples Congress government formed the National Association for the Advancement of Muslims (NAAM) based at Wandegeya. Sheikh Swaibu Ssemakula, who was a senior cleric at the Uganda Muslim Community of Kibuli, crossed to the NAAM and was declared the first Mufti of Uganda. Akbar Adoko Nyekon, a cousin to the executive premier Milton Obote, became the President of NAAM, deputized by Sheikh Obeid Kamulegeya.

Important to note is that although NAAM’s aim was to promote Islam, it used government patronage to seize mosques belonging to Kibuli. This resulted into bloody clashes between the two factions in Kajara, Ntungamo District.

Amin’s era and the formation of the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council

In 1971, Idi Amin overthrew Obote in a coup and assumed power. One of his earliest tasks was to redress the religious imbalances created by the colonial and post-colonial regimes. He formed the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council, or UMSC, following a religious conference at Kabale. He forced all existing Muslim factions to form the Council with its headquarters at Fort Lugard, Old Kampala. Amin, most strikingly, gave the Council a secular Constitution that was prepared by Solicitor General Mukambo Mugerwa. The Muslim factions had no input whatsoever.

Sheikh Abdulrazak Matovu was consequently elected Chief Qadhi and Sheikh Islam Ali Kulumba became his deputy. It should be noted that the NAAM faction came out of the Conference victorious, having taken all posts except that of Deputy Chief Qadhi, which Amin personally requested for Kibuli.  As founder of the UMSC, the head of state controlled the operation of the organization, appointing and dismissing leaders at will.

Amin, for instance, dismissed Chief Qadhi Abdul Razak Matovu on allegations of incompetence and sent his successor Sheikh Silman Matovu on forced leave because of ill-health that resulted from a planned motor accident. The UMSC thus remained without top leadership until the fall of Amin in 1979. The military leader had placed the administration of the Muslim body in the hands of his secretary for defense, Col. Emilio Mondo, a non-Muslim.

The post-Amin era

Since the UMSC was Amin’s project, it almost collapsed with his departure in 1979. Paul Muwanga, the post-Amin minister of internal affairs, requested Prince Badru Kakungulu for a possible Muslim leader, paving way for the appointment of Sheikh Kassim Mulumba as interim Mufti. He was supposed to serve for six months.

Unfortunately, Sheikh Mulumba exceeded his term and prompted the stakeholders to elect a parallel UMSC administration in a 1980 Assembly that took place at Makerere University.

The Makerere Assembly elected Sheikh Obeid Kamulegeya as the rival Mufti and Prince Badru Kakungulu as Chairperson of the parallel leadership. Prince Kakukngulu later managed to convince the two competing muftis to bury their differences and work together in one administration. Thus Kamulegeya agreed to step down, and became deputy mufti under Mulumba.

This arrangement didn’t last for long. Sheikh Mulumba resigned under pressure from Sheikh Kamulegeya, leaving the latter as full mufti at Old Kampala. Mulumba, however, shortly after renewed his claim to muftiship and pitched camp at Masjid Noor on William Street. Mufti Kamulegeya used the police to drive his rival from William Street and confined him to a small mosque at Rubaga Road, popularly known as Kabalaza. Mulumba continued challenging the UMSC leadership from his Kabalaza base.

Tito Okello era (1985)

Following the 1985 coup by Tito Okello, Mulumba also mounted his own coup at Old Kampala against Sheikh Kamaulegeya. The January 1986 NRM takeover found the two rivals in Mecca trying to represent Uganda at the Muslim World League (RABITA) annual conference.

The Mecca Agreement

Reconciliation talks were held between the rivals in the holy city, resulting into the Mecca Agreement after successive Ugandan governments had failed to solve Muslim wrangles. These governments had instead interfered in Muslim affairs, exploiting factional differences for political advantage. The purpose of the Mecca Agreement was to unite the two warring factions represented by Sheikh Mulumba and Sheikh Kamulegeya.

It was agreed that the two muftis step down and an interim Chief Qadhi be elected. Accordingly, Sheikh Rajab Kakooza was elected Chief Qadhi, deputized by Sheikh Ibrahim Saad Luwemba.

A Constitutional Review Commission was set up to revise the 1972 Muslim Constitution. Elections were later held right from village mosques up to the UMSC General Assembly. Eventually Sheikh Luwemba was elected mufti, deputized by Sheikh Muhammad Ssemakula.

But the supporters of Sheikh Kakooza allied with the Tabligh (Salafi) group to prevent Sheikh Luwemba from accessing the Agha Khan Mosque, which then housed the UMSC headquarters. Luwemba and his group retreated to Rubaga Road and then took their rivals to Court. Luwemba won the case and was consequently installed as Mufti of Uganda in 1991.

As soon as Court declared Luwemba mufti, the Tabligh attacked Old Kampala. It took the combined effort of mobile and military police to round up and detain the attackers. Some of them spent close to three years in prison.

Following this bloody confrontation, a unity conference was organized. Invited by President Museveni, delegates from member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation and other international organizations met in Uganda to explore possible solutions to the crisis in the UMSC. The Government of Uganda was represented by six persons, namely; Prof. George W. Kanyeihamba as the chairman, Hajat Anuna Omar, Hon. Gertrude Njuba, Eng. Salvano Katama, Mr. Ralph Ocan and Prof. Bardu Kateregga.

A meeting was convened in Kampala and later in Mbarara in 1993 (the Mbarara Proclamation) and resolved to drop both Sheikh Kakooza and Sheikh Luwemba. These were to be replaced by Sheikh Ahmad Mukasa and Sheikh Zubair Kayongo as mufti and deputy mufti, respectively. Both came from the Kibuli faction. However, President Museveni rejected the elections, arguing that he expected the Assembly to make recommendations; not to elect new leaders.

The swearing-in ceremony that was supposed to be held at Clock Tower was thus stopped by the then Vice President Samson Kisekka. The new leaders were nevertheless sworn in at Wandegeya Mosque and established their base at Kibuli.

Mufti Shaban Mubajje

Sheikh Luwemba’s death in 1997 paved way for fresh elections in 2000 since his deputy, Sheikh Muhammad Ssemkaula, was too old to cling to power. Various forces representing different interests contended for leadership. For instance, Kibuli fronted Sheikh Kakooza for mufti and businessman Hassan Basajjabalaba for chairman. However, Sheikh Mubbaje, having mobilized a lot of support from everywhere except in Buganda, emerged the winner.

Sheikh Twaibu Mukuye from the Luwemba group became deputy mufti, Ahmad Adrama from Northern Uganda was elected chairman and Basajjabalala of the Kibuli faction became vice chairman. However, 10 sheikhs from Kibuli led by Zubair Kayongo immediately denounced the election of Mubajje and vowed never to be loyal to him. Sheikh Kamulegeya was inclusive as the mastermind of the protests against the administration of Mubajje.

The short honeymoon

The first eight years of Mubajje’s reign constitute the longest period of unity in the history of the Muslim community in Uganda, and that was 2000 – 2008. This unity could have lasted longer if only the issue of property had been handled technically, professionally and ethically by the stakeholders at Old Kampala.

This brings us to the important question of operating a religious organization using a secular law (CAP 110) where the mufti doubles as General Manager. A manager of a company can sue and be sued, as it has happened in the UMSC history. It is therefore important that we separate management from spiritual leadership in order to avoid the embarrassment of the mufti appearing in Court to answer charges of misappropriation.

There is also the problem of politicization of religion and religionalisation of politics. The factions within the Muslim community normally make religion an avenue to achieve political scores and, at the same time, make politics as a channel to achieve their religious ambitions.

The way forward

In efforts to solve Muslim conflicts, the Muslims have used both internal and external approaches right from the colonial era to present day, but no concrete solution has been found. Ugandan Muslims have often blamed much of their failures on government interference. As discussed in the history of these wrangles, solutions have either been short-lived or have come to naught.

Therefore, in an attempt to forge the way forward, I wish to make it crystal clear that since all odds have been defied by the crisis in Muslim leadership in this country, the wrangles may be reduced or controlled in the following ways:

Constitutional review

As I argued earlier, the Muslims need to establish a constitutional review committee for restructuring their Constitution. The UMSC is registered and managed by a secular law under CAP 110 of the Companies Act. The committee should review and come up with a constitution that is Sharia-based, but practical and applicable in a multi-religious Uganda.

Federal arrangement

The most common cause of Muslim wrangles is based on property rights and ownership, as witnessed in the current conflict between Old Kampala and Kibuli. As a solution, the Muslims need to introduce a federal arrangement (in the proposed new constitution) so that each group manages its properties, even though it may pay allegiance to the UMSC.

Buganda factor in Islam

It’s a historical fact that Islam was first introduced to Uganda through the Buganda Kingdom. And it’s equally true that two kings of Buganda – Kabaka Mutesa I (1856 – 1884) and Kabaka Kalema Nuhu (1888 – 1889) – established Islam as a state religion in Buganda. It was also the Baganda converts who spread Islam to the rest of Uganda. Therefore, the tendency of using preponderance of numbers to eliminate the Baganda Muslims from leadership should be stopped.

The Baganda contributions and roles to Islam should be appreciated in the same way the Baganda should appreciate the contribution of other tribes. Islamic teachings emphasize consensus and not democracy. So the views of the minority are as important as those of the majority. There’s need for mutual respect if we are to solve these wrangles.

Inter-Religious Council of Uganda (IRCU)

As an impartial and umbrella body of faith-based organizations, the IRCU could be invited to provide a platform on which we can borrow a leaf from our sister religious organizations like the Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox, among others. It’s even more interesting that the IRCU has launched a peace institute to forge solutions to religious conflicts in Uganda.

Separating spiritual leadership from management and fixing of term limits

In case of a reviewed constitution, issues of accountability, transparency and unethical behavior should be incorporated in the Constitution. Spiritual leadership should be separated from management. Term limits should be imposed on the office of the mufti instead of the current 75-year age limit.

Equally necessary is the establishment of a Muslim think tank, which would be crucial in seeking for solutions to conflicts.

Dialogue: Here the players relate with one another to bring about mutual enrichment without necessarily removing fundamental differences.

A National Muslim Elder’s Forum should be constituted from different groups to help in mediation.

The Organization of Islamic Cooperation can similarly be sought as a mediator.

Involve the youth and women given their numerical strength. These groups should equally be empowered with religious knowledge to play more useful roles.

Advanced leadership training institute for sheikhs should be established to enhance their leadership skills.

Establish a Muslim Peace Council to promote peaceful relations and harmonious coexistence.

True faith in Islam: Muslim leaders should avoid pretence and avoid putting personal interests ahead of community interests.

Professionalism in property management: separate management from spiritual leadership, employ competent and ethical staff and pay staff salaries promptly.

Consider Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms as opposed to the Courts of Law, which have failed to solve Muslim conflicts in the past.

Avoid legal contradictions. Muslims should refrain from using two contradicting legal systems at ago – the western legal system and the Sharia law. They should stick to the Sharia in handling their conflicts.

Conclusion

It should be noted that conflicts are part of humanity and regardless of their intensity, they are never insurmountable. Much as solutions have been attempted to address conflicts in Muslim leadership in Uganda, we shouldn’t be daunted to continue applying Muslim solutions to Muslim wrangles.

The factions involved in the wrangles are so much taken up by their side of the story that they do not want to listen to the views from the other sides, however plausible they may be. Yet, the conflicting sides have no strategy or clear solution to their wrangles.

Much as Muslims should try to find their own solutions, they can still seek for external solutions. That’s why the Tripartite Committee comprising of the Government, Old Kampala and Kibuli groups should be given chance to contribute to finding solutions. Its success will depend on the seriousness of the parties involved.

Prof. Kateregga presented this paper to the Uganda Muslim Youth Assembly Ramadan Seminar on Sunday 12, August 2012, at Kibuli Primary Teachers College in Kampala.

SOURCE: CAMPUS JOURNAL

Prof Hyuha Mukwanason’s Presentation to the Presidential Committee on Muslim Affairs (August 2, 2012)

Standard

In the Name of Allah, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful

DIVISIONS AND WRANGLES AMONGST MUSLIMS IN UGANDA:  CAUSES, ISSUES AND THE WAY FORWARD

 

by

Mukwanason A. Hyuha

Professor of Economics

 

 

And hold fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allah (which He stretches out for you, i.e. the Qur’an) and be not divided among yourselves, … (Surah 3: Al ‘Imran, verse 103)

 

 

  1. 1.      Introduction

This paper attempts, I hope successfully, to bring out and discuss causes of Muslim divisions and wrangles in Uganda at least since 1972. A way forward is also outlined. The coverage of the paper is as follows:

 

  1. Introduction
  2. Causes of Muslim Wrangles in Uganda
  3. Sale of Muslim Properties and the Wrangles (1972 to date)
  4. The UMSC Constitution and the Wrangles
  5. The Way Forward

 

I accepted to participate in activities of the Committee set up by H.E. the President of the Republic of Uganda for a number of reasons. First, as a Muslim from one of the most prominent Muslim families in Eastern Uganda, I am duty-bound to throw some light on the nature, morphology, and underpinnings of Muslim wrangles in Uganda as well as to suggest a way forward. My father, the late Al-Hajji Sheikh Asumani Wandera Muhwana, played a major role in the spread and sustenance of Islam in Eastern Uganda (particularly, the then Districts of Karamoja, Teso, Sebei, Bugisu, Bukedi and part of Busoga), while my brother, the late Al-Hajji Asumani Mugoya Mbubi, also played a significant role, particularly in the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council (UMSC) matters. Al-Hajji Mbubi was, among other things, a founder member of the UMSC and UMSC’s Vice Chairman for a long time—at the time the late Al-Hajji Prince Badru Kakungulu was the UMSC Chairman.

 

Second, I played an extremely significant role in the ascendancy of Sheikh Shaban Ramadhan Mubaje to the post of Mufti of Uganda. I was an important, unforgettable member of the Kachumbala Caucus that consisted of Muslims from all over Uganda; and I was part of a strong, unbreakable machinery that successfully ensured that Mubaje was elected as the Mufti of Uganda, despite various odds. My major motivation for joining the Mubaje caucus was to ensure that the reign of the ‘old guards’ came to an end. This, I hoped, would ensure that marginalization of Muslims from outside Buganda, massive wastage, misuse and embezzlement of Muslim funds/properties by Muslim leaders, leadership of the Uganda Muslim Ummah by less enlightened Muslims and stagnation in the development of Muslims and their development projects would all end, and, hence, be relegated to the museum of Muslim history in Uganda.

 

Third, I was chairman of the Muslim Properties Committee (MPC) of the UMSC soon after Sheikh Mubaje was sworn in as the new Mufti of Uganda in 2000. The MPC is a sub-committee of the UMSC Executive Committee. Sheikh Mayanja Luyombya (then UMSC’s Secretary for Administration) was the secretary of the MPC. The committee was given a list of all Muslim properties as handed over to the UMSC by former President, Idd Amin, in 1973. By this time, many properties had either been handed over to returning former owners (Asians) or sold off by various UMSC administrations. We attempted to devise clean management of the properties. However, our efforts were frustrated by the Secretary to the sub-committee. I reported over five times to the Mufti as to how the MPC work was being sabotaged by Sheikh Luyombya; at least two of the reports were in writing. In all cases, the Mufti took no action. Consequently, I resigned from the sub-committee out of frustration. I did inform the Executive Committee during one of its meetings about this resignation and the reasons that had compelled me to resign.

 

Fourth, I have always felt that Muslims outside Buganda are highly marginalized. Two examples can illustrate the issue. One, most of the Muslim assets are concentrated in Buganda. In fact, many resources resulting from donor funds are concentrated in Buganda, yet the funds are donated to all Muslims in Uganda. Two, many Baganda—particularly conservative Baganda—want only Baganda Muslims to dominate all Government and other appointments. A case in point is when some non-Baganda (Nusura Tiperu, Mahiri Balunywa and Mukwanason A. Hyuha) were appointed by Government to the Council of the Islamic University in Uganda (IUIU) in March this year. Many conservative Baganda opposed the appointments; many came out publicly to declare that the three appointees did not include a Muganda; others claimed that the appointees were non-Muslims—yet some of them had served as members of the General Assembly, the Joint Session and the Executive Committee of the UMSC together with Prof. Hyuha since 2000. Many denounced these appointments in various sermons and speeches in (mainly Kampala) mosques and funerals, yet, honestly, many of these conservatives know extremely little about how a university is run or even the functions of a university as opposed to a Muslim family, social club, maddrassa, or mosque. Finally, it should be noted that Mr. Balunywa is from the famous Anas Kinyiri Family, one of the most prominent Muslim families in Eastern Uganda.

 

Fifth, as alluded to above, I was an elected member of the General Assembly, the Joint Session and the Executive Committee of the UMSC for over 10 years since 2000. I have been a very active member of the UMSC. For example, I was a member of the five-man delegation that visited Libya in 2000.[1] The construction of the Gaddafi Mosque on Old Kampala Hill resulted from that important visit.

 

Sixth, in the mid-1990s, a group of Muslims and I organized a meeting of some Muslims from outside Buganda. The meeting took place in Jinja, and was well attended. The main objective of the meeting was to brainstorm over  avenues, plans, strategies and associated issues related to the development of Muslims in Eastern, Western and Northern Uganda. This was because of the marginalization of Muslims outside Buganda. These marginalized, ‘peripheral’ Muslims wanted a voice of their own; an organisation to cater for these Muslims was to be formed. The organisation was, inter alia, to unite Muslims in its sphere of influence, to mobilize both internal and external resources for the good and development of the concerned Muslims, and to develop Islam in the area. Various committees were set up to come up with a constitution, a development plan as well as the vision and mission of the proposed organisation. This organisation, unfortunately, died a still birth, following infiltration by some conservative Baganda cliques.

 

Lastly, I was an active member of the Makerere University Muslim Students’ Association while a student at the university. I learned a lot of advocacy techniques with regard to Muslim issues during that time.

 

Hence, I feel I am as qualified as anybody else to discuss Muslim issues. I have participated in Muslim wrangles in one way or another; and the wrangles or divisions have impacted on me in various ways over time.

 

  1. 2.       Causes of Muslim Divisions in Uganda:  The Independent Variables

 

In this section, I present what I believe to be the main root causes of Muslim wrangles or factors that have led to divisions amongst Muslims in Uganda over time. These causal or independent variables include:

 

  1. Ethnicity/Sectarianism
  2. Politics and Ideology
  3. Fight over Control of Internal and External Funds and Other Resources
  4. Lack of Separation of (Buganda) Royalism from Religious Issues
  5. Lack of Professionalism
  6. The old Muslims with low (secular) education vs the Educated Muslims
  7. Unemployment amongst the unskilled Muslims
  8. Poor Governance of Muslim Institutions
  9. Religious  Decline/Decline in Faith (Iman)
  10. Lack of the Attributes of Secrecy and Confidentiality among most Muslims

2.1  Ethnicity/Sectarianism

As it is very well known, Islam in Uganda was introduced by Arabs during the 1880s. The spread of the religion started in Buganda, with a significant involvement of the royal family. The late Prince Mbogo played a major role in the spread of Islam in Uganda; so did Prince Badru Kakungulu. Hence, up to now, the Mbogo lineage is gratefully recognized by all Muslims as having played a crucial role in the introduction and spread of Islam in Uganda. In fact, Prince Mbogo is respectfully referred to as Jajja w’Obusiraamu mu Uganda, a title which was also enjoyed by the late Prince Badru Kakungulu and is now being enjoyed by Prince Kassim Nakibinge (the heir of Prince Badru Kakungulu).

This historical fact has led to many Baganda—particularly the conservative ones—to think that Islam is their exclusive domain. Hence, the Mufti should be a Muganda, other important national leaders should be Baganda, Muslim Government appointees to Ministries, Boards of parastatals, universities and related institutions should be Baganda. The conservatives appear not to be happy whenever a non-Muganda Muslim is appointed to a high-ranking post. In fact, a number of times these conservatives wish that these appointments are for people from only certain areas of Buganda, such as Butambala. For example, when Tiperu, Balunywa and I were appointed to the IUIU Council, one Muslim Muganda came out openly during a radio talk show to state that he was opposed to the appointments because all the three were non-Baganda (not non-Muslim)! Another example is that whenever Government consults certain Baganda high-ranking Muslims for suggestions of Muslims who should be appointed to Cabinet posts and various Boards or RDC positions, these (conservative) Muslims come up with names from only Buganda.. Even facilities and assets donated to Muslims by Muslim brothers outside Uganda are concentrated in Buganda for no obvious reasons other than ethnicity or sectarianism!

These obvious and unhealthy tendencies by the (possibly conservative) Baganda have led to great unease between Baganda and non-Baganda. This polarization of Muslims along ethnic or sectarian grounds, I strongly believe, is one of the major causes of divisions and wrangles amongst Ugandan Muslims. Some use this polarization to cover up their wrong deeds. For example, after being accused of selling off left and right Muslim properties, Sheikh Mubaje found it easy to inform Muslims outside Buganda—particularly in Eastern Uganda—that he is being hated because he is not a Muganda!

2.2   Politics and Ideology

Islam and politics in Uganda have always had an unhealthy marriage. Politicians have always exploited Muslim divisions and wrangles to advance their unsavoury causes or plans. For example, during Obote I, the National Association for the Advancement of Muslims (NAAM) was founded ostensibly to develop Muslims. A Minister close to President Obote was the chairman of the association, while prominent Muslim leaders and sheikhs became key members of the NAAM. Many of the prominent Muslim members of the NAAM were very well read in Islamic education and affairs, but with little secular education. Some of these Muslims would, for instance, go around trying to convince Muslims that the ‘word’ NAAM was even in the Holy Qur’an; hence, opposition to NAAM meant opposition of the holy book!

The NAAM polarized Muslims. As it was advocated mainly by UPC party members, many non-UPC supporters opposed it. There were serious quarrels—and even fights amongst Muslims in Ankole and other areas of Uganda. Some of the fights were inside mosques. Even Mauledis were interrupted, e.g. at the Bukabeba mosque in my home area.

Islamic fundamentalism has also led to divisions amongst Muslims in Uganda. Some members of some Muslim sects regard themselves as the only true Muslims; other Muslims not embracing such sects are regarded as non-Muslims.

To date, politics and ideology and Islam are so inextricably intertwined that the first two variables continue to be significant divisive factors amongst Ugandan Muslims. Many wrangles are a result of these two variables.

2.3   Fight over Control of Internal and External Funds and Other Resources

Muslims of the good old days were full of faith (iman). They worked relentlessly to spread Islam and preserve Muslim assets basically without any significant pecuniary returns. They hardly told lies or got involved in crimes or heinous sins. They worked for the Most Gracious, Most Merciful Allah who would reward them in any way He felt fit.

This is hardly the case these days; religious leaders of the old days have been replaced by modern religious entrepreneurs. The entrepreneurs care little about faith; they use the religion to maximize their individual or personal benefits and profits. For example, one aspires to become a District Kadhi so as to get access to funds and other resources available and accruing to the District. He uses religion to advance his hidden entrepreneurial ambitions.

So, there is a lot of competition not to serve the Almighty Allah, but to get access to funds and other resources from within Uganda and from donors outside the country. The ouside resources are mainly from Saudi Arabia, the Arab Emirates, Libya and Pakistan. This competition resulting from declining religious faith (less fear of Allah), I believe, is one of the important independent variables in the equation to explain Muslim divisions and wrangles in Uganda.

2.4   Lack of Separation of (Buganda) Royalism from Religious Issues

As noted above, as a result of the history of Islam—particularly how it was introduced and spread in Uganda, the line of demarcation between Islam and the royal family in Buganda is extremely thin and blurred. Islam and royalism are so intricately intertwined that the two appear inseparable in some quarters, particularly amongst many members of the Kibuli grouping of Muslims. Hence, republican or non-feudalist Muslims in and outside Buganda find it difficult to belong to the Kibuli group. This has also brought about divisionism amongst Muslims.

2.5   Lack of Professionalism amongst Muslims

Many Muslim leaders have a high level of Islamic education, but very minimal secular education. Hence, they do not possess adequate skills to be employable in the civil service, industry or other sections of the private sector; yet employment in mosques as imams and other Muslim institutions is too limited to employ all. In fact, there appears to be four groups of Muslims in regard to religious and secular education:

  1. A group consisting of Muslims highly educated as regards religious affairs—such as the Qur’an, hadith, sharia, and so on—but with little secular education. Many are highly fluent in Arabic, but have a poor mastery of English; they are, therefore, very comfortable preaching in Luganda and other local languages, rather than in English.
  2. A group consisting of well educated people:  very good Islamic education and good or fairly good secular education. These persons can preach in a local language or English.
  3. A group with very high secular education, but with little Islamic education. These are unable to understand Arabic, but are very fluent in English.
  4. A group with little or no secular education and equally little or no Islamic education.

There has often existed a lot of mistrust amongst the four groups. This has also brought about misunderstandings, mistrust and unease amongst Muslims in the country. For instance, at meetings like the General Assembly of the UMSC, wastage of time occurs. There are always time-wasting translations at meetings from one language (Luganda, English or Kiswahili) to another or others. In these cases, efficiency is the victim.

Moreover, you find sheikhs with no knowledge of bookkeeping and administration camouflaging as cashiers, accountants and crucial administrators in certain Muslim organisations. Some are quite unemployable, despite their high, commendable Islamic education.

2.6   The Old Muslims with Little Secular Education versus Other Muslim Groups

There are often collisions between Group 1 and Group 3 as listed in the previous section; the two groups tend to dislike each other, while Group 2 fits in all situations much better. It should also be noted that sometimes there are divisions amongst members in Group 1 and Group 2, depending on where they obtained their Islamic education. Was one educated in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Libya, Pakistan or Uganda? So, the source of Islamic education often creates unease and sometimes mistrust, misunderstandings and wrangles amongst Muslims in Uganda. Moreover, the youth with latest Islamic education often regard the old as not well-schooled in Islam!

This is a simple but disturbing issue among the two groups of Muslims. There should be efforts aimed at preventing sending ‘secularly uneducated’ youth for Islamic education outside Uganda.

2.7   Unemployment amongst the Unskilled Muslims

As stated above, employment opportunities in mosques and other Islamic institutions are too few vis-à-vis the number of Muslims—particularly with minimal secular education—seeking employment. Many young Muslims with little secular education were sent abroad to study diplomas and degrees in Islamic studies, such as sharia. On return to Uganda, they have found themselves unemployed for the reason just stated.

These ‘secularly unskilled’ Muslims end up fighting over the extremely limited job openings in mosques and other Islamic institutions. These unhealthy fights over limited employment opportunities have often led to divisions and wrangles.

2.8   Poor Governance of Muslim Institutions

There are two major Muslim institutions in Uganda:  the UMSC and the Islamic University in Uganda (IUIU). These are national institutions and big employers. The UMSC was founded in 1972, while the IUIU was established in 1988—to unite and develop all Muslims in the country, and to offer university education to Muslims, respectively, in addition to performing all other Muslim functions, like spreading Islam in the country.

These national institutions, have, unfortunately, been characterized by bad governance. This bad governance has been caused and sustained by, and, in turn, has led to the following:

  • Ethnicity and other types of sectarianism have badly maimed the two institutions. This factor has particularly been manifested in employment patterns at the IUIU.
  • Dictatorship has enjoyed an upper hand in the institutions. The end justifies the means; leaders of the institutions will do anything—ranging from telling lies to smear campaigns—so as to sustain their leadership, i.e. so as not to lose that leadership.
  • Party politics has infiltrated them to the extent that even the institutions’ bone marrow is being eaten away.
  • The moral fabric is also being wasted away. Leaders are no longer ashamed of telling lies to Muslims or massively wasting off or swindling institutional funds and properties/assets.
  • Intrigues and counter-intrigues are common occurrences at the institutions.
  • These leaders often find scapegoats for their failures. They cannot see the specs in their eyes. For example, when Mubaje finds himself in hot soup due to the alleged sale of Muslim properties, he is not ashamed to tell non-Baganda that he is in trouble because he is not a Muganda. And when Dr. Sengendo has allegedly security issues to answer and is excessively frightened by the appointments of the no-nonsense Hyuha and Balunywa (who has written many dossiers on the rector’s mismanagement of IUIU funds and other resources), he generates side issues and mobilizes his conservative Baganda henchmen to spread a diversionary message to the unsuspecting Muslim public.
  • The institutions have become sources, generators and nurturers of all types of divisions and wrangles amongst Muslims.

Thus, poor governance has been a major factor in the generation and fanning of Muslim divisions and wrangles.

2.9   Religious Decline/Decline in Faith (Iman)

This issue has already been touched on; the Muslims and Muslim leaders of today are less faithful than Muslims of the good old days. They are less God-fearing than our forefathers. Their moral fabric and behaviour leave a lot to be desired. Hence, these days, the worst enemy of a Muslim is in most cases another Muslim, rather than a person of a different religious belief. Further, many religious leaders are arrogant, tell lies to unsuspecting followers and involve themselves in immoral activities, unlike in the good old days

This great loss of faith, I believe, is a significant explanatory variable in regard to Muslim divisions and wrangles in Uganda today.

2.10   Lack of the Attributes of Secrecy and Confidentiality among Most Muslims

Unlike Catholics who have a world leader of their faith (the Pope), Muslims are not so organized at a global level. The Pope plays a big role in uniting and guiding Catholics, in addition to solving potential religious and other disputes among the Catholics and their leaders. In fact, the Pope can summon a ‘misbehaving’ church official and detain him in Rome for as long as he wants (e.g. like he did to Archbishop Milingo of Zambia in the 1970s).

No such figure, like the Pope, or institutional set-up exists for Muslims.

Some of the attributes the existence of the institution of the Pope has inculcated amongst Catholics are secrecy and confidentiality. Discussions in churches and other religious meetings are kept confidentially—high secrets to Catholics alone and hardly divulged to non-Catholics. Other Christians appear to have similar behaviour. However, Muslims do not appear to respect these attributes of secrecy and confidentiality. No sooner is a matter discussed in a closed Muslim meeting or mosque than it is divulged to non-Muslims. Muslim disagreements and quarrels are an open secret, whilst such matters among other religions are discussed in secrecy. Muslim affairs are discussed in the news media, or mosques during khutbahs, or at funerals, etc. That is, Muslims, unlike followers of other faiths, are fond of washing their dirty linen in public!

This, I believe, is another set of important independent variables in explaining divisions and wrangles amongst Muslims in Uganda.

  1. 3.       Sale of Muslim Properties and the Wrangles (1972 to date)

It has been claimed in some quarters that sale of Muslim properties is the major cause of the current divisions and wrangles amongst Ugandan Muslims. This is far from the truth. Sales of properties, embezzlement of funds, misuse of Muslim assets and other resources, and dishonesty and mischief among Muslim leaders are as old as the UMSC itself.

It is an undeniable fact that at the birth of the UMSC, President Idd Amin Dada gave the Old Kampala Hill (minus Lugard’s monument) to UMSC. The new body kept on accumulating its own properties as time went on. On September 27, 1973, President Idd Amin handed over 233 properties (previously owned by some of the expelled Asians) to the UMSC.

When Sheikh Mubaje became Mufti in 2000, many of the 233 properties had either been returned to previous Asian owners or sold off by the administration at Old Kampala. Some properties had been dubiously seized by debtors. An example will do here. The UMSC owned  a housing estate at Najjanankumbi and another on Plot 2 Hoima Road, among others. By 2000, out of the 18 houses comprising the Najjanankumbi estate, only one (the official residence of the Mufti) was left; the 17 no longer belonged to the UMSC. Some had gone during Sheikh Kakooza’s reign, others during the late Sheikh Luwemba’s reign, and so on. There are two reports of Committees of Inquiry that show in no uncertain terms that Mufti Mubaje and his regime also sold off quite a number of Muslim properties, in addition to alleged embezzlement of funds. Hence, the sale of Muslim properties appears to cut across all UMSC regimes since 1972.

.These sales are, therefore, not the main cause of Muslim divisions and wrangles. They have only aggravated the divisions and wrangles. The sales are the petrol that has been poured on dry wood that had already caught fire (divisions and wrangles brought about by the 10 variables explained in the previous section); the wood is now burning almost beyond limit. Removal or stoppage of the fuel action will definitely not extinguish the intense fire; the dry wood will continue burning, albeit at a slower pace. It is the dry wood that must be removed as of now.

  1. 4.       The UMSC Constitution and the Wrangles

The UMSC constitution, as amended and approved on December 5, 1986, has a number of weaknesses and loopholes. The Mufti who can assume power at the age of 40 can be in office until he clocks 70 years; the Director of Sharia until 65 years and a member of the Majlis Al-Ulama until he is 70 years. This is a big hurdle to those aspiring to assume any of those posts.

4.1   The Age Factor

In my opinion, the age factor is the first problem with the constitution. If one lands a good, faithful Mufti, it is fine; he can be in power up to 75 or more. However, with an unfaithful, dishonest and dictatorial Mufti—allergic to telling the truth and money-hungry—the age 70 is a serious problem. Bad leaders must be gotten rid of as soon as possible.

This problem can be mitigated if term limits are introduced. The Mufti should be in power for, say, 7 years (like the Secretary General), re-electable once.

4.2   The Management Committee (Article 12)

The Mufti is both the spiritual head of Muslims in Uganda and the chairman of the Management Committee (Articles 5 and 12). As chairman of the Management Committee, he gets involved in the day-to-day running of the administration, yet the Secretary General is the chief accounting officer (Article 13(4)). This may cause bad blood between the Mufti and the Secretary General. For instance, Mufti Mubaje was the principal signatory to a number of (if not all) UMSC accounts, despite strong protestations by the Executive Committee. He gave up this role when the accounts after some time hardly had money on them, i.e. when account balances were in the neighbourhood of zero.

I propose that the Mufti should just be a spiritual leader. Management or administration should be left to the Secretary General, who, after all, the constitution recognizes as the one in charge of all other Secretaries  This suggestion may not be acceptable; but, the point is that the Mufti should handle only spiritual issues. He should not be entangled in administrative matters and controversies. Somebody else should head administration.

4.3   Qualifications for the Office of Mufti (Article 6)

Whereas the Director of Sharia should be “fluent in Arabic language and having a working knowledge of English” (Article 7(d)), no English requirement is stated for the Mufti. Modern Uganda with so many Muslims fluent in both Arabic and English deserves a Mufti with at least “a working knowledge of English”, in addition to fluency in Arabic and a degree in sharia. This is my considered opinion.

4.4   Quorum at Meetings

Article 17(8) states that the quorum at meetings of the General Assembly, the Joint Session, the Executive Committee, and meetings of other UMSC bodies shall be one-third of the members of the body or organ concerned. The constitution does not discuss the quorum by representation. This is a serious loophole. To illustrate, take the example of the membership of the General Assembly. Assume there are 26 Muslim Districts with 20 large ones and 6 small ones, population-wise. By Article 2, the big Districts will send 100 representatives to the Assembly, 20 of whom will be District Kadhis. The small ones will contribute 18 members to the Assembly, 6 of whom will be District Kadhis. Taking into account the 8 specially elected members, the Assembly will consist of 126 members, 26 of whom will be District Kadhis.

The Kadhis, given the way they are appointed,  owe their allegiance to the Mufti, who is free to dismiss or discipline any of them at any time. Hence, one can raise a quorum by having 26 Kadhis plus 16 members elected by Districts through electoral colleges and the 8 specially elected. Mufti Mubaje understands this quorum issue very well; he can cause a meeting of the General Assembly with many of the elected representatives uninvited (and, therefore, absent), but with all the Kadhis around (present). An example is the bogus meeting that sanctioned the creation of 24 new Districts and, thereafter, dissolved the General Assembly.

This issue needs attention during the review of the current constitution.

4.5   Lack of Constitutionalism

On a number of instances, the constitution has been violated intentionally in broad day light. Two examples can illustrate this issue:

  • Article 9 outlines very clearly the procedure for removing or impeaching the Mufti, the Chairman, their deputies, and the Secretary General. Al-Hajji Muhammad Adrama was duly elected as the Chairman of the UMSC in 2000. He was, however, removed through unconstitutional means. On the fateful day, he chaired a meeting of the Joint Session during the morning. During lunch time, he rushed to town to attend to urgent personal matters. The meeting resumed soon after the lunch break under the chairmanship of Al-Hajji Adrama’s deputy. By the time Al-Hajji Adrama returned, hardly an hour after the resumption of the meeting, he had been removed from chairmanship! This was effected despite my strong and loud protestations. Thereafter, Al-Hajji Adrama was told in a rude manner to join the backbenchers, for his deputy had been installed as an acting chairman. Al-Hajji Adrama obliged.

 

  • The work of the Appointments Board under Mufti Mubaje’s regime was basically inexistent. It was taken over by Mubaje and his henchmen. So, many appoinrments were done outside the Appointments Board. For instance, although I was a member of the Board—under the chairmanship of Engineer Abbas Mugisha—I do not know how Al-Hajji Mutumba was appointed to the post of Public Relations Officer. The Board chairman also had no knowledge, so he told me. In any case, I do not remember whether such a post were ever created by the Executive Committee or any other legal UMSC body. Mutumba is just one example of numerous such dubious appointments.

 

This is very sad. How do we guard against such acts in future?

 

  1. 5.       The Way Forward

This issue of the way forward needs deeper thinking and a lot of brainstorming. Due to pressure of work and the short time I have had to prepare this paper, I have not engaged in acts of debating these issues with colleagues of mine. However, I can hazard and outline some suggestions as follows:

 

  1. A discussion of the 10 causes of the wrangles must take place. If this needs the convening of a national conference, then let it be.

 

  1. The constitution needs urgent review. Issues discussed above, among others, must be attended to during the review.

 

  1. Both the current leaderships of Old Kampala Hill and Kibuli Hill must vacate office so as to start on a clean slate. We must create a win-win situation, as opposed to a loser-winner game product/outcome.

 

  1. Institutions and systems must be devised to ensure prevalence of constitutionalism and to guard against excesses in administration.

 

  1. The Mufti should just be a spiritual leader, as discussed above.

 

  1. Intensive screening of applicants to the post of Mufti (and Kadhis and other important posts) must be done. It is, for instance alleged that Sheikh Mubaje committed the same ‘sins’ as the District Kadhi of Mbale. If this is true, this information was, unfortunately, not available at the point of his election to the post of Mufti of Uganda in 2000.

 

  1. Muslims should be intensively and extensively sensitized, so that they love their religion more, they keep secrets, they are confidential, and they are not enemies of one another.

 

  1. We need Almighty Allah’s intervention as soon as possible.

 

 

 

 

 

Kampala

August 2, 2012


[1][1] The other members of the delegation were Sheikh Shaban Ramadhan Mubaje, Sheikh Abbas Mukasa, Al-Hajji Idris Kasenene and Al-Hajji Habib Kagimu.

Professor Mukwanason Hyuha ‘unhappy’ with UMBS administrator, Abbey Semuwemba, on the IUIU issue

Standard

Dear Brother Semuwemba,

I hope you are fine during this holy month.

Asalaam Aleykum!

I write to forward to you (for your consumption and the consumption of other brothers and sisters) a paper that formed the gist of my 3-hour presentation to the Presidential committee on Muslim affairs, chaired by Prof. Tarsis Kabwegyere. I was privileged to be invited by the committee to brainstorm over causes of divisions and wrangles amongst Muslims in Uganda, governance, and the way forward in my view. I appeared on August 2, 2012.

Further, let me take this opportunity to highlight a few biases here and there, with respect to some communication originating from you and some brothers and sisters. First, following our appointment to the IUIU Council, The Muzaatas and Hassan Khiryas of this world mounted a serious smear campaign against Brother Balunywa and myselft. This was through, inter alia, Kampala mosques and funerals in Buganda. Balunywa amd I kept quiet for some time after these attacks. Afterwards, I sent some article to the Observer rubishing the naked lies in the news media resulting from the smear campaigns. Read what you wrote after I sent the same write-up to you! You stated that we should not be brandishing our cvs in the media; we should find a way of solving problems outside the media. Yes, you are right. But why did you not say so immediately these Dr. Sengendo mesengers/henchmen started washing dirty linen in mosques and funerals? This is Bias No. 1.

Second, you suggested that a committee be set up to deal with such issues – which is a good idea. But when it came to suggesting the persons that should be on the committee, you blumdered again: your list consisted of only Muslims from Buganda! Read your writing again. Are there no prominent Muslims from outsie Buganda?

Other Muslims did add to your list. They also exhibited the same bias! In fact, one of them included Muzaata Batte in the list? Can Muzaata tell you, if you interviewed him, the functions and role of a university? Does he know that our IUIU has no professor, despite the fact that it was founded in 1988? Does he know that there is hardly any research going on in IUIU, and yet a university without research is just a glorified secondary school? Does he know that standards are very low at IUIU? Does he know that it is basically Teaching Assistants and a few lumpen lecturers running the show at IUIU If you are a person of substance, it is hard for you to stay at IUIU as an instructor. Does he know that beautiful buildings without a solid academic foundation and process do not make a university worth talking about? He might be well read in Islamic matters, but is he well read in university matters? I hope by now you know that whatever they sheepishly uttered was from a misleading, diversionary script written by Sengendo. He exploited their ignorance over these issues to achieve his malicious intentions.

One sister wondered at the “crimes” Mukwanason had committed while at Makerere. The basis for her surprise was what appeared in the newspapers – a statement supposedly issued by the PRO of IUIU.. Does she believe whatever appears in newspapers? Was she aware that all those “crimes” were mere concoctions? Was she aware that HYUHA had been charged with such “crimes”, including one that he had admitted Prof. Abbas Kiyimba’s wife (Rehema) to a postgraduate course illegally? If she believes in whatever is printed or written, then she is an ardent believer in the Bible which is more authentic than the newspaper story.
Were you not surprised that the protests against the appointments of Balunywa and Hyuha were just in Buganda? If you were not, then this is Bias No….

As a young man with a big future in front of you and a potential leader of the Muslim Ummah, please, steer clear of such biases. Of course, I know that you may be unconsciously or unknowingly biased. But try to get rid of such biases. This is my earnest advice, albeit unsolicited.

Stay well. I hope you will enjoy reading through my presentation on the link below.

http://um-bs.com/2012/08/09/prof-hyuha-mukwanasons-presentation-to-the-presidential-committee-on-muslim-affairs-august-2-2012/

Wasalaam….

Professor Hyuha Mukwanason
Kampala
Uganda

OPEN LETTER TO FELLOW MUSLIMS

Standard

Fellow Muslim Brothers and Sisters in Islam, Asalam Alaikum Warahumatullah Wabarakatuhu. I pay tribute to those who lost their dear ones in the week and we pray that Allah judges them with mercy. We pray for the sick and thank Allah for the good things.

 

Let start with Brother Matovu Abdallah’s post, I quote “…..we have to behave and act above factionalism like where you find a forumist castigating the Christian headed (not owned) media for “giving prominence” to “another Kibuli leaning Muslim gunned down.”

 

This is exactly, what i have been telling Muslims whenever i get the opportunity to write something. It’s our responsibility as Muslims to behave responsibly in attempting to deal with the catalog of absurdities holding us back.  At all fronts, we appear to be firing blanks- we are fighting our themselves like grasshoppers in a bottle, impenitent by all standards and unwilling to give peace and unity a chance to thrive. We are always passing blame, pointing fingers all the time again, and again unwilling to work for a better tomorrow.

 

Ours is a muddled society, full of fellow Muslims who have now dedicate their entire lives spreading fear and hatred. This is not right. Such people cannot be a catalyst for peace and development, the Muslims need today. We must all come gather and stop taking sides. We must transcend the politics of Kibuli Vs Old Kampala or Mubajje Vs Kayongo fanatism- This is not helping us at all. Let’s stop promoting abhorrence and forge a way forward- together as Muslims united by our faith and not personal desires. This is what Allah wants from us.

 

The Holy Qur’an says that those who create differences in the Deen (Islam) are among the Mushrikun: “Be not among the Mushrikun i.e., those who create differences in Deen (Isalm) and become sects. Each (sectarian) party quite content with itself (that it is following the correct path).” (30:32)

 

And in another verse- “And those who create division in Deen (Islam) and become divided into sects, O Prophet (PBUH)! You have no part in them in the least.” (6:159). Fellow Muslims, from the above verses, it’s obvious that we are supposed to work together towards a common goal set by the Quran and shown by the Prophet (PBUH) through his Sunnah. We all are brothers and sisters, our chauvinisms notwithstanding because we are bonded by the common ideology of the unity of Allah and the unity of humankind.

 

Fellow Muslims, the utmost important duty for every one of us should be to preserve and protect the Muslim unity and not to cause any division in the Muslim rank. As I indicated in a recent article, once again, I call upon fellow Muslims to open a NEW PAGE and take a bold step forward. That single bold step is to stop blacklisting mosques. All mosques belong to Allah so why blacklist them? We Muslim pray in all these mosques without discrimination. We must lead by example.  This is the right thing to do. In any case the Holy Qur’an calls upon us (Muslims) to be united and hold on steadfastly to the rope of Allah (i.e. Qur’an) and gives a stern warning to them not to create any divisions (3:103) amongst themselves.

 

Let’s stop the hate Khutubas and begin preaching the need for unity. We must move forward together as Muslims. I believe we can achieve a lot for our deen, for ourselves and for our people who are languishing in abject poverty.  It’s only after achieving unity that we can begin talking about development projects and taking part in leadership positions.

 

Muslims will be stronger and once again, we will salvage our rightful place on the table. This is possible and it can be done. It doesn’t need money to be done- it starts with you. Forget those factions and be a Muslim who can pray anywhere. This is what Allah wants. The decisions we take today will ultimately shape the future for our children, the future for our Muslim brothers and sisters who are struggling in the countryside. The time to act is now; the time to say no to factions is right.  May Allah Bless You All. Happy Ramadan

 

From Yasiin Mugerwa

Daily Monitor/The Times of London

ymugerwa@ug.nationmedia.com

yasiin.mugerwa@thetimes.co.uk

 

The Purpose of Qadianism

Standard

Doctrines of Islam feared the most

The enemies of Allah, wishing to enslave the humanity to a relentless pursuit of the transient allures of this life, have always been very weary of two Islamic doctrines:

  1. The Islamic belief in Allah’s limitless mercy, knowledge, and power that propels every Muslim to shape his/her life for the sole purpose of achieving closeness with Allah in the hereafter. This means that a Muslim strives to live in accordance with the instructions of Allah and is willing to selflessly sacrifice his/her time, talent, property and very life in the cause of Islam and humanity.
  2. The oneness of the Muslim Ummah, based in the common belief in Allah, Muhammed, and the Holy Quran, is reinforced through the rituals that all Muslims – regardless of national origin, socio-economic class, race, gender, and age – routinely follow.

Attacks faces by Islam and the Muslims

It is natural, then, to expect the enemies of truth, brotherhood, justice, and freedom to attack these doctrines in their relentless pursuit to weaken Muslims, both individually and as a nation. These are some of their favorite methods:

  • Direct Attack
    • Terrorism directed toward Muslims;
    • Military Intervention.
  • Indirect Attack
    • Ridiculing the doctrines of Islam by:
      • Attributing derogatory terminology (fundamentalist, intolerant, backward, …) with Islam and Muslims;
      • Making fun of Muslim scholars thought speeches, poetry and movies;
      • Making fun of Islamic lifestyle;
      • Withholding science and technology from Muslim nations and blaming the society’s lack of progress on Islam;
      • Supporting, through higher education (PHDs, MDs, Professors), those individuals who can be trusted either not to practice Islam or reject its doctrines as useless and outdated;
      • Glorifying successful public personalities who reject the ideals of Islam;
    • Sponsoring and supporting political leaders who are willing to slowly convert the society to an unIslamic and immoral system, designed for better exploitation of individuals and resources;
    • Supporting organizations and individuals who reject Islamic doctrine through false publications against the character of the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم), authenticity of the Holy Quran and all Hadith, and the doctrines of Islam;
    • Imprisoning legitimate Muslim scholars on false charges;
    • Planting pseudo-scholars who preach a very destructive and baseless version of Islam;
    • Making divisive, extremist, and heretic movements and Sects within Islam;
    • Planting new and alternative man-made “religions”.

Throughout the history of Islam, shortsighted individuals have resorted to such tactics to control the masses and undercut their innate desire for justice, equality, and freedom. The “Indirect” method has been proven to be the least costly to them – in terms of the loss of life, overall expense, and the long-term success. By relying on this method, the exploiters hope to gain the control of the masses in a slow, calculated fashion. They, in effect, hope to brainwash the Muslims generation after generation, until most “Muslims” can not recognize truth fom falsehood and will mindlessly become slaves to every whim of the immoral and the powerful.

We pray that Allah will bestow upon us the wisdom to see these stealth methods of attacks used by the enemies of Islam

The role of Qadianism

The Qadianism (Ahmadiyyat) cult was created and is being promoted by the enemies of Islam, for the sole purpose of weakening and dividing the Muslim Ummah, at the time when the colonial powers were seeking to prepare the Muslim world for exploitation. Setting aside the unIslamic teachings of the Mirza Ghulam Qadiani (ie. rejecting the Finality of Prophethood, claiming to be a second Advent of Prophet Muhammad, belying the verses of the Holy Quran, abusing Jesus Christ, and striving to create extremism and hatred between Muslims and Christians), the doctrine of Qadianism (Ahmadiyyat) differ from Islam in its open pursuit of making the masses obedient and subservient to the interests of immoral, unjust, and tyrannical rulers.

The following are among such doctrines of Qadianism (Ahmadiyyat), as advocated by its founders:

  • Every Qadiani (Ahmadi) must be willing to sacrifice his/her wealth and life for the Government (which at the time was the British Empire) in charge, regardless of the actions of the regime;
  • No Qadiani (Ahmadi) can participate in demonstrations and Jihad against an oppressive or unjust Government;
  • Qadianis (Ahmadis) are to follow every teaching of Mirza Ghulam Qadiani (their prophet), even when it is in clear contradiction to the teachings of Islam.
  • Qadianis (Ahmadis) are expected to hold Qadian (India) and Rabwah (Pakistan) as their holy cities;
  • Qadianis (Ahmadis) are taught to feel superior to Muslims and are expected to try to convert Muslims into Qadianism, by referring to false and baseless missionary arguments;
  • Qadianis (Ahmadis) are to believe that Muslims are unbelievers;

The Qadiani leadership would like you to believe that Mirza Ghulam Qadiani was a prophet of Allah and that his instructions, contradicting the verses of Quran, common sense, and the inspiration of every freedom and justice lover individual around the globe, were not simply an attempt to enslave a nation to the foreign powers of the era! They would like us to believe that Mirza’s attempt to divide the nation and make it obedient to the oppressors, exploiters, and aggressors of the era were not the act of a self-serving individual, but those of a prophet of God!

However, historic evidence proves, without a doubt, that Mirza Ghulam Qadiani was engaged in spreading propaganda in support of the tyrannical British Empire of his time. As he confessed in his own reports to his British overlords, he appointed himself to his post of prophethood to “remove the spirit of Jihad (struggle for freedom and independence) from the mind of ignorant Muslims“.

The evidence documented on our site at http://www.irshad.org/ will leave no doubt for any believer that Mirza Ghulam Qadiani was no more than a pretender and an opportunist. In fact, high level Qadianis are very well aware of this fact and have been actively engaged in activities to hide and confuse the evidence. Obviously, they are more interested in carrying out the mission of their misguided founder and propagate their wealth generating organization, than saving souls. Sadly, most of their followers are kept in the dark regarding the unIslamic role of the movement they are supporting.

We should strive hard to inform every unfortunate Qadiani (Ahmadi) of the deceptive claims of the Movement they have somehow become affiliated with.

http://semuwemba.wordpress.com/

The Difference Between an ‘elite’ Ahmadiya/Qadiani and a ‘dupe’ one

Standard

Assalamu Alaikum brothers and Sisters,

I would like to offer some few explanations to the statement i made some few days ago under the headline:’‘UMBS’s POSITION ON AHMADIYAS OR QADIANIIYYAH”. Some people have written that ”my entire presentation was flowing in a certain direction, but amazingly, i failed to make that logical conclusion.’’

First of all, I think some statements by some people made me look like a very complicated person yet I’m not. The statement I made had a lot of intentions but the main ones were: 1- to keep sanity on the forum in the long run because I knew where this was going, basing on my experience on UMBS-Facebook- where one of such threads alone has generated over 1600 comments; 2- to show forumists that we know that the Qadianies/Ahmadiyas are disbelievers but we need the best way forward;3- find a way to help them become Muslims again without the use of any tough language. Yes, ‘Kafir’ as a term is part of the tough language; 4- to leave the final judgment in the hands of Allah because He knows better.

So, if one bothers to look at my statement properly, one would see that the last arguments are not, at their core, about conclusion of anything, but about mainly finding a way forward that does not keep Muslims in constant fights with the Ahmadies/Qadianies.My arguments are based upon the fact that, from a strictly objective standpoint, there is a NON-ZERO probability that some Ahmadies/Qadianies may in fact be already regretting their decision to join such a sect, and therefore we must take into account that probability and the corresponding potential risk to labeling them ‘Kafir’ yet they may want to become Muslims again. This is just common sense, brothers and Sisters.

There are basically two kinds of Ahmadiyas. The first is the “elite Ahmadiya.” This kind of Ahmadiya doesn’t really care that s/he is promoting a philosophy that is anti-Islam and all.The reason such a person would continue to promote something like that even when they know it doesn’t work is that it does work: to put them in power, fat jobs and other privileges that comes along with it. Like i stated in that statement, most of the Ahamadiyas or people who claim to be Ahmadiyas/Qadianis are doing well financially. They have got unlimited financial resources if you bother to find out. So, people under this category could do anything to defend Ahmadiyasim/Qadianism.

The other kind of Ahmadiya is the “dupe,” or ” Bangamba nyingire obuhamadiya.” This person really believes what he’s trying to sell you because the ‘elite Ahmadiya’ has convinced him/her. But this person is your best prospect to be saved from him/herself. These are the people Muslims should target, but you will find it difficult to convince them to your side if you keep calling them ‘Kafiirs’. Find a better way of tapping into the humanity in them to bring them to your side. Nobody likes to be called ‘Oli Musiru’ all the time though s/he may be really less intelligent.

It’s not too difficult to tell the difference between the two. The elite will last about 30 seconds in a debate. When they get tired of debating and see that they are losing ground, at this point, they usually “go bananas” and begin calling you names or abusing you,such as ‘you are also a Kafir’, ‘you are stupid’,’ that’s why you support so and so’, and stuff like that.

These labels serve to allow them to avoid arguing on your terms and get you to argue against the label they’ve provided (on their terms), and thereby change the entire complexion of the debate into one they can win.They will get under your skin whether you like it or not because they are trained to do so. They’ll accuse you of getting all your information from wrong sources, wrong sheiks or Imams. They will provide you with websites or books of their own to render you weaponless. I have seen their arguments on facebook and how some Uganda Muslims keep losing debates because they are ill equipped to debate with them. The inference is that there’s no truth there and your assertions are therefore irrelevant. They’ll try to use all sorts of ploys to avoid an actual, rational discussion of the issues, which they know they can’t win because they’re wrong. It’s as simple as that. And by the way, they are good at doing research before they write anything down.

The “dupes” or ‘” Bangamba nyingire obuhamadiya ‘’, on the other hand, will attempt to use the same tactics because they’ve been taught to argue that way by the “elites.” But they won’t be as good at it and thus will be more easily vanquished, and then more amenable to reason. Once people find out they’ve been duped, they get mad about it. So, this is the group we should put our efforts on through conferences, friendships, love and respect, thus one of my statements:’’ We should continue to interact with the Ahmadiyas with respect and love they deserve.’’ Don’t distance so much yourself from them but learn how to argue if you wanna bring them back to Islam.If you don’t know how to debate or argue your points well, then may be you have good reasons not to be in the same forums as them.

If you believe in my ”friendly” approach, you will get net results. If you believe in the approach of: ‘that is not your brother, so don’t treat him with respect and love”, you won’t get results’. Trust me on this!! Look, Humanity does have hope, you may one day find Mr.Kiyingi, Haggaz, Ali Muwanda and others, once into serving blindly for Mirza Ghulam Ahmad al-Qadiani, now something nearing closer to Islam.

We could argue this approach infinitum and probably not resolve anything, so we will have to fundamentally disagree on this point. So, please, I again request Uganda Muslims not to call Ahmadiyas/Qadianis: ‘Kafiirs’, and find a better way of bringing them back to Islam.

I cannot provide a better overall explanation than this. But people are free to draw any sort of conclusions they wish from what I wrote, because to be honest: I never concluded anything, apart from making recommendations or suggestions.

Byebyo banange

Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba

UMBS’s POSITION ON AHMADIYAS OR QADIANIIYYAH

Standard

Asslamu alaikum wa rahamatullah wa barakatuh my dear brothers and Sisters,

I pray that you and your family are in the best of health and faith, aameen.

Jazaakallah khayr for honoring me with the management of the UMBS and whatever is attached to it so far, and may Allah bless you tremendously for your sincere efforts and concerns, aameen.

When it comes to calling other Muslims kaafirs, it is a major ugly sin, as per hadith below:

It is not permissible for a Muslim to use the word kaafir lightly, because judging a Muslim who believes in Tawheed to be a kaafir is a major sin. Imaam Muslim reported that the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) said: “Any man who says to his brother, ‘O kaafir,’ if this description fits him, then he is a kaafir, otherwise it will come back on him (the one who said it).” He (صلى الله عليه وسلم) also said: “No man accuses another of being immoral or of being a kaafir but it will come back on him if his companion is not like that.” (Bukhari)

Sadly, there are people who claim to be Muslims but in fact are not. For example, the qadianies/ahamdies. They have disbelieved in the finality of the Prophet-hood of Mohammed (saw) are therefore have made their belief null and void.

Here is some info for you:

Qadianiyyah is a movement that started in 1900 CE as a plot by the British colonialists in the Indian subcontinent, with the aim of diverting Muslims away from their religion and from the obligation of jihaad in particular, so that they would not oppose colonialism in the name of Islam. The mouthpiece of this movement is the magazine Majallat Al-Adyaan (Magazine if Religions) which was published in English.

Foundation and prominent personalities:

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad al-Qadiani (1839-1908 CE) was the main tool by means of which Qadianiyyah was founded. He was born in the village of Qadian, in the Punjab, in India, in 1839 CE. He came from a family that was well known for having betrayed its religion and country, so Ghulam Ahmad grew up loyal and obedient to the colonialists in every sense. Thus he was chosen for the role of a so-called prophet, so that the Muslims would gather around him and he would distract them from waging jihaad against the English colonialists. The British government did lots of favours for them, so they were loyal to the British. Ghulam Ahmad was known among his followers to be unstable, with a lot of health problems and dependent on drugs.

Among those who confronted him and his evil da’wah was Shaykh Abu’l-Wafa’ Thana’ al-Amritsari, the leader of Jama’iyyat Ahl al-Hadeeth fi ‘Umoom al-Hind (The All-India Society of Ahl al-Hadeeth). The Shaykh debated with him and refuted his arguments, revealing his ulterior motives and Kufr and the deviation of his way. When Ghulam Ahmad did not come to his senses, Shaykh Abu’l-Wafa’ challenged him to come together and invoke the curse of Allaah, such that the one who was lying would die in the lifetime of the one who was telling the truth. Only a few days passed before Mirza Ghulam Ahmad al-Qadiani died, in 1908 CE, leaving behind more than fifty books, pamphlets and articles, among the most important of which are: Izaalat al-Awhaam (Dispelling illusions), I’jaaz Ahmadi (Ahmadi miracles), Baraaheen Ahmadiyyah (Ahmadi proofs), Anwaar al-Islam (Lights of Islam), I’jaaz al-Maseeh (Miracles of the Messiah), al-Tableegh (Conveying (the message))and Tajalliyyaat Ilaahiyyah (Divine manifestations).

Noor al-Deen (Nuruddin): the first Khaleefah of the Qadianis. The British put the crown of Khilaafah on his head, so the disciples (of Ghulam Ahmad) followed him. Among his books is: Fasl al-Khitaab (Definitive statement).

Muhammad Ali and Khojah Kamaal al-Deen: the two leaders of the Lahore Qadianis. They are the ones who gave the final shape to the movement. The former produced a distorted translation into English of the Qur’aan. His other works include: Haqeeqat al-Ikhtilaaf (The reality of differences), al-Nubuwwah fi’l-Islam (Prophethood in Islam) and al-Deen al-Islami (The Islamic religion). As for Khojah Kamaal al-Deen, he wrote a book called al-Mathal al-A’laa fi’l-Anbiya’ (The highest example of the Prophets), and other books. This Lahore group of Ahmadis are those who think of Ghulam Ahmad as a Mujaddid (renewer or reviver of Islam) only, but both groups are viewed as a single movement because odd ideas that are not seen in the one will surely be found in the other.

Muhammad Ali: the leader of the Lahore Qadianis. He was one of those who gave the final shape to Qadianiyyah, a colonialist spy and the person in charge of the magazine which was the voice of the Qadianiyyah. He also produced a distorted translation into English of the Qur’aan. Among his works are Haqeeqat al-Ikhtilaaf (The reality of differences), and al-Nubuwwah fi’l-Islam (Prophethood in Islam), as stated above.

Muhammad Saadiq, the mufti of the Qadianiyyah. His works include: Khatim al-Nabiyyeen The seal of the Prophets).

Basheer Ahmad ibn Ghulam. His works include: Seerat al-Mahdi (the life of the Mahdi) and Kalimat al-Fasl (Decisive word).

Mahmood Ahmad ibn Ghulam, his second Khaleefah. Among his works are: Anwaar al-Khilaafah (Lights of the caliphate), Tuhfat al-Mulook and Haqeeqat al-Nubuwwah (The reality of prophethood).

The appointment of the Qadiani Zafar-Allaah Khan as the first Foreign Minister of Pakistan had a major effect in supporting this deviant sect, as he gave them a large area in the province of the Punjab to be their world headquarters, which they named Rabwah (high ground) as in the aayah (interpretation of the meaning): “… And We gave them refuge on high ground (rabwah), a place of rest, security and flowing streams.” [al-Mu’minoon 23:50].

Their thought and beliefs

Ghulam Ahmad began his activities as an Islamic daa’iyah (caller to Islam) so that he could gather followers around him, then he claimed to be a mujaddid inspired by Allaah. Then he took a further step and claimed to be the Awaited Mahdi and the Promised Messiah. Then he claimed to be a Prophet and that his prophethood was higher than that of Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

The Qadianis believe that Allaah fasts, prays, sleeps, wakes up, writes, makes mistakes and has intercourse – exalted be Allaah far above all that they say.

The Qadiani believes that his god is English because he speaks to him in English.

The Qadianis believe that Prophethood did not end with Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), but that it is ongoing, and that Allaah sends a messenger when there is a need, and that Ghulam Ahmad is the best of all the Prophets.

They believe that Jibreel used to come down to Ghulam Ahmad and that he used to bring revelation to him, and that his inspirations are like the Qur’aan.

They say that there is no Qur’aan other than what the “Promised Messiah” (Ghulam Ahmad) brought, and no hadeeth except what is in accordance with his teachings, and no Prophet except under the leadership of Ghulam Ahmad.

They believe that their book was revealed. Its name is al-Kitaab al-Mubeen and it is different from the Holy Qur’aan.

They believe that they are followers of a new and independent religion and an independent Sharee’ah, and that the friends of Ghulam are like the Sahaabah.

They believe that Qadian is like Madeenah and Makkah, if not better than them, and that its land is sacred. It is their Qiblah and the place they make hajj to.

They called for the abolition of jihaad and blind obedience to the British government because, as they claimed, the British were “those in authority” as stated in the Qur’aan.

In their view every Muslim is a Kaafir unless he becomes a Qadiani, and everyone who married a non-Qadiani is also a kaafir.

They allow alcohol, opium, drugs and intoxicants.

Intellectual and ideological roots

The westernizing movement of Sir Sayyid Ahmad Khan paved the way for the emergence of the Qadianiyyah, because it had already spread deviant ideas.

The British made the most of this opportunity so they started the Qadiani movement and chose a man from a family that had a history of being agents of the colonialists.

In 1953 CE, there was a popular revolution in Pakistan which demanded the removal of Zafar-Allaah Khan from the position of Foreign Minister and that the Qadiani sect should be regarded as a non-Muslim minority. In this uprising around ten thousand Muslims were martyred, and they succeeded in having the Qadiani minister removed from office.

In Rabee’ al-Awwal 1394 AH (April 1974), a major conference was held by the Muslim World League in Makkah, which was attended by representatives of Muslim organizations from around the world. This conference announced that this sect is Kaafir and is beyond the pale of Islam, and told Muslims to resist its dangers and not to cooperate with the Qadianis or bury their dead in Muslim graveyards.

The Majlis al-Ummah in Pakistan (the central parliament) debated with the Qadiani leader Mirza Naasir Ahmad, and he was refuted by Shaykh Mufti Mahmood (may Allaah have mercy on him). The debate went on for nearly thirty hours but Naasir Ahmad was unable to give answers and the Kufr of this group was exposed, so the Majlis issued a statement that the Qadianis should be regarded as a non-Muslim minority.

Among the factors that make Mirza Ghulam Ahmad an obvious Kaafir are the following:

His claim to be a Prophet

His abolition of the duty of jihaad, to serve the interests of the colonialists.

His saying that people should no longer go on Hajj to Makkah, and his substitution of Qadian as the place of pilgrimage.

His anthropomorphism or likening Allaah to human beings.

His belief in the transmigration of souls and incarnation.

His attributing a son to Allaah and his claim to be the son of God.

His denying that Prophethood ended with Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and his regarding the door of Prophethood to be open to “any Tom, Dick or Harry”.

The Qadianis have strong ties with Israel. Israel has opened centres and schools for them, and helped them to publish a magazine which is their mouthpiece, to print books and publications for distribution worldwide.

The fact that they are influenced by Judaism, Christianity and al-Baatiniyyah is clear from their beliefs and practices, even though they claim to be Muslims.

Their spread and positions of influence

Most of the Qadianis nowadays live in India and Pakistan, with a few in Israel and the Arab world. They are trying, with the help of the colonialists, to obtain sensitive positions in all the places where they live.

The Qadianis are very active in Africa and in some western countries. In Africa they have more than 5,000 teachers and dai’yahs working full-time to call people to Qadianiyyah. Their wide-spread activity proves that they have the support of the colonialists.

It is claimed that the British government is also supporting this movement and making it easy for their followers to get positions in world governments, corporate administration and consulates. Some of them are also high-ranking officers in the secret services.So, they are an influential group of people with power and unlimited financial resources.

In calling people to their beliefs, the Qadianis use all kinds of methods, especially educational means, because they are highly-educated and there are many scientists, engineers and doctors in their ranks. In Britain there is a satellite TV channel called Islamic TV which is run by the Qadianis.

From the above, it is clear that:

Qadianiyyah is a misguided group, which is not part of Islam at all. Its beliefs are completely contradictory to Islam, so Muslims should beware of their activities, since the ‘Ulama’ (scholars) of Islam have stated that they are Kaafirs.

For more information see: Al-Qadianiyyah by Ihsaan Ilaahi Zaheer.

(Translator’s note: this book is available in English under the title “Qadiyaniat: an analytical survey” by Ehsan Elahi Zaheer)

Reference: Al-Mawsoo’ah al-Muyassarah fi’l-Adyaan al-Madhaahib wa’l-Ahzaab al-Mu’aasirah by Dr. Maani’ Hammad al-Juhani, 1/419-423

The following statement was published by the Islamic Fiqh Council (Majma’ al-Fiqh al-Islami):

After discussing the question put to the Islamic Fiqh Council in Capetown, South Africa, concerning the ruling on the Qadianis and their off-shoot which is known as Lahoriyyah, and whether they should be counted as Muslims or not, and whether a non-Muslim is qualified to examine an issue of this nature:

In the light of research and documents presented to the members of the council concerning Mirza Ghulam Ahmad al-Qadiani, who emerged in India in the last century and to whom is attributed the Qadiani and Lahori movements, and after pondering the information presented on these two groups, and after confirming that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claimed to be a prophet who received revelation, a claim which is documented in his own writings and speeches, some of which he claimed to have received as revelation, a claim which he propagated all his life and asked people to believe in, just as it is also well-known that he denied many other things which are proven to be essential elements of the religion of Islam

In the light of the above, the Council issued the following statement:

Firstly: the claims of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad to be a prophet or a messenger and to receive revelation are clearly a rejection of proven and essential elements of Islam, which unequivocally states that Prophethood ended with Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and that no revelation will come to anyone after him. This claim made by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad makes him and anyone who agrees with him an apostate who is beyond the pale of Islam. As for the Lahoriyyah, they are like the Qadianiyyah: the same ruling of apostasy applies to them despite the fact that they described Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a shadow and manifestation of our Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him).

Secondly: it is not appropriate for a non-Muslim court or judge to give a ruling on who is a Muslim and who is an apostate, especially when this goes against the consensus of the scholars and organizations of the Muslim Ummah. Rulings of this nature are not acceptable unless they are issued by a Muslim scholar who knows all the requirements for being considered a Muslim, who knows when a person may be deemed to have overstepped the mark and become an apostate, who understands the realities of Islam and kufr, and who has comprehensive knowledge of what is stated in the Qur’aan, Sunnah and scholarly consensus. The ruling of a court of that nature is invalid. And Allah knows best.

Majma’ al-Fiqh al-Islami, p. 13

WHAT IS THE WAY FORWARD FOR UGANDA MUSLIMS?

As Muslims in Uganda, we must find a way forward which does not put us in a sword battle with Ahmadiyas, thus, the suggestion that we should avoid using the word ‘kafir’ when openly debating or interacting with them. Surely, if we wish to pull them on our side, we should find a better way of doing so, and I think calling them names is not an option at all.

As such, I request all members of UMBS and the rest of the Muslims in Uganda to drop the word ‘kafir’ from their vocabulary whether addressing Minister Kiyingi Asumani or one of our dedicated forumist, Mr. Ezzelddeen Haggaaz. There is no net benefit in calling them names or abusing them in any way. If anybody wishes to help them drop the Ahmadiyasim, they gonna have to do better than that.

My issue is that if we claim to value integrity then there is no reason to go into a war with anybody who claims to be what s/he is not. On this note, im very happy that Imam Kasozi has decided not to go into bitter exchanges with Minister Kiyingi over his beliefs. We will, however, welcome a statement from Mr.Kiyingi if he disputes anything that the ‘honorable’ Imam wrote here on UMBS. Yes, he is our ‘Imam, regardless of how he acquired the tittle. Probably, one day one of us on this forum would be called a ‘Dr’, due to a honorary degree from some University, but will that make us more important than those without those tittles? The answer is ‘No’. As long someone is having an impact on the community, s/he should be appreciated and respected.

Personally, I believe every human being is useful in one way or the other, and its only Allah with the powers to judge at the end of the day. For instance, if someone claims to be your wife when she is actually not, but she goes ahead and wash your clothes, looks after your kids when you are at work, irons your clothes, e.t.c, why would you make her an ‘enemy’ as long as you know what you want. The most important thing is to make sure she never crosses the line and puts on an ‘eva suite’ in your presence.

Similarly, we have benefited from especially the debate Mr. Ezzelddeen Haggaaz has been having with Mr.Paul Mugerwa  and other non-Muslims on Ugandans At Heart(UAH) forum. He has been admirably defending Islam with the best intellectual skills anybody could think of. If,at the end of the day, one of the non-Muslims on UAH embraces Islam, who will receive the credit from Allah? Please, let us not get excited on matters that are beyond our control. We should continue to interact with the Ahmadiyas with respect and love they deserve. We leave the final  judgement to Allah for He knows better.

Thank you everyone and Wassalam

Byebyo ebyange banange

Abbey Kibirige  Semuwemba

UMBS president

Stalk my blog at: http://semuwemba.com/

Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/semuwemba

Follow UAH at: http://ugandansatheart.org/

IUIU problems:Minister Kiyingi(Ahmadiya) is not a Muslim-says Imam Kasozi

Standard

Imam kasozi while distributing Qurans and Islamic books to Northn Uganda.

Imam kasozi while distributing Qurans and Islamic books to Northn Uganda.

Dear brothers and sisters,
Let us not stop at lamenting. Let us dig deep and find out who is fighting the IUIU and the Rector. Emerging issues seem to suggest that saboteurs wanted to cut a deal so they fabricated stories many of which are unbelievable.

The onus is on us to exactly discover who is behind this, Isolate them and treat them with the contempt they deserve. The state which has a bigger hand in investigations should try to find out who is doing this malice to the Muslim community.

There are attempts in some section of the community to take this as a Dr. Sengendo affair. Many responsible Muslims have been heard to suggested quick alternative without ever looking at the bigger picture. Let nobody convince you that with their simplistic solutions. Think critically if you belong to this Ummah.

It seems someone is just afraid of the success and he is working with forces of darkness in the community to disorganise the institution. We shall not just look on, we must be part of the solution. I know amongst us there are those with their small problems/issues with Dr. Sengendo as their current or former boss but this should not blind us and we suffered the Greenland experience.

We know for sure that there are many capable Ugandan Muslims to run this institution but Dr. Sengendo has distinguished himself and he is about to retire.

For Minister Kiyingi he needs our prayers to become Muslim again as he disgraced into the Ahmadia version which to the opinion of many Muslims ulamas who sit on the Figh academy, they have been declared non Muslim, so not a sect of Islam as some would like us to believe. Figh academy is the highest intellectual body as well as spiritual institution that handle Islamic Religious matters. Uganda is lucky to be one of those countries represented on this board and our representative is Dr. Anasi Abdunoor Kaliisa.

We appreciate that he is the minister but he must know that the ideals of IUIU are purely Islamic and the core values of this institution attest to that. So in choosing who to sit on this council the core values must be respected.

For mangers of IUIU please highlight this on the admission forms the way Kings College Buddo has done. We all go there know what code of conduct we are expected to adhere to.

Brothers let us concentrate on development and empowering our community UMSC we shall find on the way or it will meet us along the development line.

I travelled to Dokolo on 16th to distribute over 2400 Mosquito Nets to the community there. I would like to thank one brother on this forum who promised to support UMYA projects this year and he has so far deposited over 3,900,000 Uganda shilling. Then I would also applaud the MIA MIA subscribers who have also deposited over 7 millions on the account. We have been able to support Kyaggwe Road Primary school Mosque project, Sekamuli Masjid Water harvesting project, Namawojjolo Islamic Primary school Toilet Project, plus the previous work Houses for Window and Blind Nakayiza in Kazo and Mzee Kigozi inKasambira Mityana North after Busunju.

Immam Kasozi
UMBS FORUMIST
Mawanga Masjid Muslim Community
Box 3999 Kampala.

We thank M7 on IUIU but he should find a better way of consulting Muslims

Standard

Dear brothers and sisters.

Assalam Alaykum

A few weeks back, space on this forum was maximally occupied with the debate about the new government appointees to the IUIU council. My point here is not to call back that discussion, as we all had our views appropriately put. Most recently, we have learnt that following the backlash and uproar from the Muslim community that followed those appointments, government reconsidered its position. The disputed people were dropped and replaced by Dr. Rashid Ssemuddu and Dr. Mahmoud Nabalegwa (an IUIU alumnus). Personally I think it fair enough to thank the government for listening and accepting to reconsider its earlier position. I therefore pass my vote of thanks to his Excellency the president and all people in his government who may have played a positive role in this matter. It is sincerely appreciated.

But a related issue which we came to learn in the process is for me the more important and most serious one. IUIU and the current Rector have been smeared with dangerous allegations of treason and terrorism. Details of these allegations are well captured in the media. Reports indicate that our dear president, based on those allegations has asked IUIU Chairman Prof. Omar Nasif, to drop Dr. Sengendo and Dr. Mpeza from the University – sounds like a trade-off for the change of government nominees to the council. Muslims of this country should also demand those allegations be substantiated. If it is true that they are involved in subversive or terrorist activities, let them be arrested and charged, so that we can all know through a court process whether the allegations are true or not – but for now, it appears that government only wants to trade “the terrorists” for a cheap price of dismissing them from their jobs – THIS IS VERY SUSPICIOUS. In all countries of the world, once a person is suspected of terrorism, the first thing is to arrest him, put him inside as investigations go on. Our own terrorists or rebel collaborators for that matter are very unique. The whole world is informed through the media about their covert activities, yet they go about freely!!!

This brings me to those very important questions which Eng. Omar Kalinge asked once on this UMBS forum (Recall – the questions we should ask about IUIU). In that post, Br. Kalinge largely dealt with the view that the two University top officers are faulted for belonging to an opposition political party JEEMA. In fact in recent media reports, the president wants a Rector who belongs to the NRM. This demand by the president corroborates what Kalinge wrote here earlier. Again if it is true that our dear president has demanded this to be done – his advisors should ask him to rethink his position. Gentlemen and Ladies, IUIU is an academic institution – the implication of the presidential demand is that politics will have been directly injected into our University, in terms of taking such high profile decisions. Just like the controversial council members were rejected, THIS MUST BE REJECTED TOO. It is setting a wrong and dangerous precedent for the University. For the sake of argument, if we take it at face value and agree with the president – to replace the opposition leaning Rector and his Vice with those who support the government, what will happen (say in 2016), if the NRM government is replaced by another party? If that new party in government decides to follow the SUNNAH of the NRM, it will mean that IUIU top administration will require to be changed immediately to remove the “NRM opposition” and introduce supporters of the new government. If you do not realize that this is a problem, you don’t have to look far for your answer – the UMSC WRANGLES is the PERFECT answer for you. IUIU will slowly be turned into a field / institution for political patronage!!!

I think those of you who are near the decision makers in this Museveni government should help us and advise the president to find a mechanism of fair consultation on Muslim affairs – sincerely, we do not want to appear to be in arms against government all the time, but there are certain things which government does and one can’t help but fight back!!

I believe some of you know that this government cannot do anything affecting the Catholic interests without the approval of the Catholic church. Let me give just one example to qualify my statement here. Some years back, when Prof. Apollo Nsibambi was Minister of Education, government came up with a policy to phase out most Primary teacher colleges (PTCs) in the country. Almost all the catholic and Anglican church based PTCs were spared. In fact a good number of them were selected and upgraded to what was then called “Core PTCs” and they were earmarked for government funding. Most of the public PTCs and the only two Muslim founded PTCs – Kibuli and Kabukunge, had been lined for phasing out!! Muslims had to “shout” through mosque Kutbah’s and UMYA Ramadhan seminars, before that decision was reconsidered!

I remember in one seminar at Kibuli PTC, Nsibambi was invited, and Haj. Abasi Kiyimba (now Professor) told him face to face, that “if our only two colleges are phased out, we shall always remember that, the decision for their closure was made and implemented at the time when Prof. Nsibambi was the Minister” – with too much “noise” from the Muslims, that decision was rescinded, and in fact Kibuli PTC was then included among the core PTCs.

Honestly the practice of handling Muslim affairs as an after-thought thing is troubling some of us! Why does it have to be done that way? Why does it make sense for government / or the president to consult other constituencies except on matters concerning Muslims? I know that many of our brothers and sisters are well placed in government positions, and are able to make this case to the president, and others responsible for making decisions. We shall appreciate if you could help to streamline that for us.

m.muslim654@gmail.com

FITINA IS TOO MUCH AMONG UGANDA MUSLIMS. WHAT DO WE DO?

Standard

FITINA Is too much among Muslims in Uganda. They even want to destroy our UMBS through constant abuses of forum rules and regulations and personal wars on the forum. Before you know it, some will be going to extra levels to discredit the management of UMBS forum and organisation. Are these the times which are referred to in the hadeeth of the Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), according to which when one of the Sahaabah asked him, “What should I do when there is too much fitnah and division?”, he replied, “Keep away from the people, and sit in your house”? In al-Saheeh, in Kitaab al-Fitan, Baab Kayf al-Haal idha lam yakun khaleefah, there is a hadeeth which says that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) told them to withdraw from people when calamities strike, and he said, “… even if you have to bite onto the root of a tree.”

Praise be to Allaah.

In al-Saheehayn and elsewhere – and this version was narrated by al-Bukhaari – it is reported from Abu Idrees al-Khawlaani that he heard Hudhayfah ibn al-Yamaan say: “The people used to ask the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) about good things, but I used to ask him about bad things, fearing that I would live to see such things.

I said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah, we were in a state of ignorance (jaahiliyyah) and evil, then Allaah sent us this good (i.e., Islam). Will there be any evil after this good?’

He said, ‘Yes.’

I said, ‘Will there by any good after that evil?’

He said, ‘Yes, but it will be tainted.’

I said, ‘How will it be tainted?’

He said, ‘(There will be) some people who will guide others in a way that is not according to my guidance. You will approve of some of their deeds and disapprove of others.’

I said, ‘Will there be any evil after that good?’

He said, ‘Yes, there will be people calling at the gates of Hell, and whoever responds to their call, they will throw them into it (the Fire).’

I said, ‘O Messenger of Allaah, describe them to us.’

He said, ‘They will be from among our people, speaking our language.’

I said, ‘What do you command me to do if I live to see such a thing?’

He said, ‘Adhere to the jamaa’ah (group, community) of the Muslims and their imaam (leader).’

I asked, ‘What if there is no jamaa’ah and no leader?’

He said, ‘Then keep away from all those groups, even if you have to bite (eat) the roots of a tree until death overtakes you whilst you are in that state.’”

The time does not refer to this particular period we are living in; it is a general idea which may refer to any time and place, from the time of the fitnah and rebellion against ‘Uthmaan (may Allaah be pleased with him) at the time of the Sahaabah (may Allaah be pleased with them all), onwards.

What is meant by keeping away or withdrawing from people at the time of division is what was mentioned by al-Haafiz ibn Hajar (may Allaah have mercy on him) in al-Fath, narrating from al-Tabari, who said: when the people do not have an imaam (leader) and they split into sects and parties, do not follow any of these groups; keep away from all of them if possible, lest one fall into evil.

So, Muslims should stay away from all the groups fighting for Muslim leadership in Uganda and concentrate on the developmental projects or developing their deen through preaching to others.

When there is a jamaa’ah that is truly following the Straight Path, then you have to join them and help to increase their numbers, and cooperate with them in truth, because in that case this group constitutes the jamaa’ah of the Muslims for that man in that place.

And Allaah is the source of strength. May Allaah bless our Prophet Muhammad and his family and companions and grant them them peace.

Fataawa  al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah, 3/95


بِسمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحمٰنِ الرَّحيمِ UMBS is a registered organization devoted to matters of interest to Muslims in Uganda.Muslims from other countries are welcome to join us too. Follow us on Facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Uganda-Muslim-Brothers-Sisters/128372957263072. Follow us on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/#!/UMBSFORUM. To donate to UMBS activities, click on: http://um-bs.com/donate/ or just deposit money on UMBS Bank A/C at Bank of Africa:07074320002 . Join UMBS forum on facebook at:https://www.facebook.com/groups/ugandamuslimbrotherssis/.

Official list of the UMSC New General Assembly Members

Standard

THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR NCHE INTERGRITY,KASOZI, IS QUESTIONABLE

Standard

The weekly observer of 27th April 2012 quoted the Executive Director of N.C.H.E Prof A.B.K Kasozi pleading to his line Minister of Education to prevail over the Minister of Foreign Affairs to withdraw two (Prof. Mukwanason and Balunywa) government Appointees. I wish to observe that the celebrated Professor from the University of California at Santa Cruz is in a much more competent position to advice on academic matters. His wealth of knowledge and experience attained from Makerere University, Islamic University and University of Khartoum where he settled after languishing on the same streets while in exile no doubt makes him a credible person to advise.

What makes Prof Kasozis’ comment’s unfortunate, diversionary and perhaps ill-motivated is the fact that before he became the Executive Director of NCHE, he was the Vice Rector (Academic Affairs) at IUIU from 1995-2002. Kasozi as a person was deeply entrenched in tribal wars at the same University, character assassinating fellow professors at the expense of entrenching his tribe’s men; in his character assassination he said “This document is a minute for my private use, am speaking aloud on a serious problem”. On 19th September 1997, he wrote a dossier pleading to Prof Mahdi Adam not to appoint Prof Sengo, the same Kasozi recommended Dr. Sengendo for Vice Rector ship to Prof. Mahdi Adam. Kasozi,s appointment as a Vice Rector was politically and mathematically orchestrated by one of the out going members of the University council ,isn’t he pleading to those who originally recommended his name to the council for vice rector ship? Kasozi himself knows the circumstances under which he became the Executive Director. One may therefore, be tempted to argue that Kasozi has personal reasons than those of NCHE. Talking to one of the council members of KIU he ignorantly while in Dar es Salaam undermined KIU yet he had previously accredited it. Could he be the rightful person to advise and head NCHE? The same NCHE directed by Kasozi has been clearing M.P contestants who are finally thrown out because of fogged and inadequate qualifications by the courts of law, is this manifestation of his competence as Executive Director?

Prof Kasozi as a custodian of quality assurance should re-acquaint himself to the quality assurance frame work (2008) and institutional capacity indicators for Universities which upholds that 60 % of the University staff should be PhD and 70 % Masters holders, the fact that IUIU has experienced a massive exodus of the mentioned, Kasozi as the ED would be much occupied with such un acceptable and serious academic problem than the composition of University council (Article 3.2.3 of NCHE quality assurance framework). Actually Kasozi should be getting more concerned with core questions of quality assurance such as: what explains the massive exodus of PhD holders away from IUIU? Why is the University dominated with teaching Assistants? How can a University exist without Professors? Why has the Rector remained a doctor for over 20 years without transcending to Professorship?

Those of us reading this article should not lose sight of the fact that Prof. Kasozis’ two biological Sons (Issa Kawalya-now iuiu lecturer and Senteza Yusuf) benefited from the staff development program of the Masters Scholarships to Indonesia without meeting the requirements of serving for 2-3 years at the university. In the same line of argument I wish to ask the following questions: Did Kasozi continue earning a salary from IUIU even when he got a job with NCHE? Hasn’t he been recently accused of employing his relatives at NCHE? Did he ably account for the money given to him on Environmental Impact Assessment while at IUIU? Isn’t Kasozi fighting tribal wars since he is a celebrated Prof. of Buganda history? Do we expect fair comments from such a person who has previously been part of the bigger IUIU problem? Should we assume that he is acting professionally as Executive Director of NCHE or as a former IUIU vice Rector who dinned with the current IUIU Leadership? Isn’t Kasozi trying to block more details from coming up once Balunywa and Prof Hyha are appointed?. I implore the concerned authorities to deeply investigate Kasozis relations with some of the IUIU officials, they should re-think his views and comments about Prof Hyha and Balunywa, They should not only look at Kasozi as the Executive Director, although it appears to be the spirit with in which he writes, they should also look at him as a former major actor of IUIU

BY SHAFIQUE SABILA FORMER GUILD PRESIDENT IUIU

Something for Muslims fighting in Uganda to think about?

Standard

WHAT IS PEACE??????????????
There once was a king who offered a prize to the artist who would paint the best picture of peace. Many artists tried. The king looked at all the pictures. But there were only two he really liked, and he had to choose between them.

One picture was of a calm lake. The lake was a perfect mirror for peaceful towering mountains all around it. Overhead was a blue sky with fluffy white clouds. All who saw this picture thought that it was a perfect picture of peace.

The other picture had mountains, too. But these were rugged and bare. Above was an angry sky, from which rain fell and in which lightning played. Down the side of the mountain tumbled a foaming waterfall. This did not look peaceful at all.

But when the king looked closely, he saw behind the waterfall a tiny bush growing in a crack in the rock. In the bush a mother bird had built her nest. There, in the midst of the rush of angry water, sat the mother bird on her nest – in perfect peace.

Which picture do you think won the prize? The king chose the second picture. Do you know why?

“Because,” explained the king, “peace does not mean to be in a place where there is no noise, trouble, or hard work. Peace means to be in the midst of all those things and still be calm in your heart. That is the real meaning of peace.”

A Committe should be formed to sort out the IUIU problems

Standard

Dear Muslim brothers and Sisters,

Assalamu alaikum. I did not want to get involved in the IUIU debate because I don’t know much about it( apart from what i read here and receive privately) but the posting linking IUIU to ADF rebels headed by Jamiru Mukulu is eye catching and worrying. What we must know is that whenever a Muslim starts making progress in something, it raises eyebrows anywhere in the world. So, we must be careful on how we handle the IUIU issue. President Museveni might have helped to see that IUIU is established for reasons best known to him at that time because he is a politician, but I have got a feeling that his mind has been poisoned by the ‘enemies’ of Islam, and wants to see this university going down in the drain. For instance, it is alleged that the Hamas is a creation of Israel’s intelligence system at the time they were fighting Yasser Arafat’s Fatah Movement for National Liberation. The Hamas guys used the funding they reportedly got from the Israelis and their Arab supporters to set up orphanages and health clinics, an Islamic University in Gaza, as well as a network of schools, and workshops. But time came when the Israelis had to turn their guns on Hamas because of the way they had organized their communities in Palestine and rendered Arafat’s PLO more or less useless.

Similarly, IUIU is progressing, and some Muslims have also started organizing themselves under different umbrellas, and this must have caught the attention of their enemies, i suppose. As noted recently by some observers on this forum, something should be done and very fast to make sure that IUIU is not conspicuously closed like Kiggundu’s Greenland Bank.

By the way, I still don’t think that it will come to this but there are several ways of slaughtering a goat or in this case- weakening an institution, and one of them is ill propaganda against it. There has been a systematic media campaign against IUIU such that I sometimes don’t understand why Muslims feel the need to run their misunderstandings in newspapers anymore instead of joining simple Local groups or Muslim forums, such as UMBS, to express themselves and sort it out with fellow Muslims.

So, one of the first things we should do before we even think of meeting president Museveni is to stop sending articles to newspapers in Uganda about Muslim affairs. The doctrine of propaganda against fellow Muslims and Islamic institutions must end. We are only embarrassing ourselves if we keep sending articles about our CVs and ‘defence’ to national newspapers. Muslims in Uganda should be better equipped, better trained, better organized, better disciplined and have a more unified spirit of resistance to outside interference.

I invited Prof. Hyuha Mukwanason to the forum such that we ‘fight’ within instead of running to newspapers but he told me that he will join later on. I also invited Brother-General Moses Ali to join us here but I’m yet to get a response from him. Anyway, apart from Mr. Kiyingi Asuman, the rest of the people i invited and involved in this saga are well represented here on UMBS. Dr. Ssengendo, his secretary and publicist secretary are all members of UMBS and President Museveni’s aides are here in abundance. So, let’s find a way forward without running to news persons.

If some people are afraid of expressing themselves freely on UMBS, let us form a committee of responsible people in Kampala to meet them to sort out all the misunderstandings. This very committee will present its findings and recommendations to the president. They will also be responsible for ensuring that the propaganda linking IUIU to ADF is stopped by the government. This propaganda alone is capable of killing that institution before it is even closed. Parents will be afraid of taking their kids there to study yet Dr.Ssengendo is on record saying that 70% of their funding comes from students fees/tuition. This ADF propaganda will lead to the start of arrest of some Muslims by the security agencies- in the name of fighting rebels or terrorism. So, we must find a way of nicking it in the bud before some people take advantage of it.

Fortunately, the stifling of expression and dialogue on UMBS forums may be in its final days as all members now know what is acceptable and what is not. We have got rules and guidelines to help us keep sanity in our debates on the link below:

http://um-bs.com/about-umbs/

It is very difficult and arduous to create and sustain an institution such as IUIU, and this is the reason why we should always be grateful to OIC and Dr. Ahmed Ssengendo and his team for whatever they have done – but history shows that closing one down is much simpler. So, if there is a problem somewhere as I have been privately made to understand, then that problem must be amicably solved even if it means getting a new team in to sort things out. I’m sure Dr. Ssengendo loves IUIU’s sustainability more than any of us here, and I’m sure if the right person can be found to carry this institution forward, he will have no problem being replaced.We should not be afraid of changes if the intentions are good and justifiable.

A morally acceptable approach to solving this IUIU sage will resolve this conundrum, ending the conflict in a way that keeps faith with the right people chosen by ordinary Uganda Muslims to administer or manage IUIU affairs, not every Tom and Dick.

So, may I suggest the following names as part of the committee to solve the IUIU crisis and do the roles some members may suggest on this forum:

1. Engineer Badru Kiggundu( Chairman EC). He is a member of UMBS and a silent contributor but he has got Muslim interests at heart

2. Mrs. Namayanja Kiwanuka

3. Prince Kasimu Nakibinje( I have got his phone but not his email address. So, someone should help us forward this to him)

4. Mr. Omar Kalinge Nyango

5. Hajji B.M. Kibirige( he is a silent member of UMBS)

6. Mr. Salim Makeera( our lawyer. May be handy as the committee secretary to advice on legal issues)

7. Sheikh Kiiza Kasule( Imam Wandegeya Mosque)

8. Hajji Abasi Kawaase Mukasa

9. E.T.C

Please don’t include newsmen and women in your affairs. You will give them headlines and this is what I hate. Whatever committee is formed, let them set a date to meet and set their agenda, aims and objectives, rationale, methodology , e.t.c. We wouldn’t mind them reporting back to us after achieving success. They should forget about Kibuli-Old Kampala politics for now and work as a team. Good luck because they gonna need it inishallah.

Byebyo ebyange

Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba
abbeysemuwemba@yahoo.co.uk

CONCERNED MUSLIM BROTHER
UNITED KINGDOM

Muslim war on Museveni

Standard

Kibuli-based faction head, Sheikh Zubair Kayongo (R) and Prince Kassim Nakibinge L) during prayers at Kibuli mosque yesterday.

Kibuli-based faction head, Sheikh Zubair Kayongo (R) and Prince Kassim Nakibinge L) during prayers at Kibuli mosque yesterday.

Kibuli hill was yesterday engulfed in calls of “Allah Akbar” as Muslims declared President Museveni Islam’s ‘Enemy Number One’ in Uganda.

Speaker after speaker told of how Museveni’s continued meddling in Muslims’ affairs has greatly divided their community.

“I have seen several governments in this country, but none beats Museveni in harassing Muslims.

He should receive a medal for that,” Sheikh Nuh Muzaata Batte, head of Dawa (chief preacher) in the Kibuli-based faction, said amidst applause from hundreds of followers that thronged Kibuli for afternoon prayers. Muslims had gathered to chart the way forward ahead of elections called by the Mufti of Uganda, Sheikh Shaban Ramathan Mubajje faction, which start today.

The Kibuli-based faction, led by Sheikh Zubair Kayongo, is opposed to the elections, saying they are an illegality since they are not sanctioned by the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council constitution, which was supposed to be reviewed in 2005. The elections at mosque level are intended to fill the 110 seats of the General Assembly. Yesterday, the Kibuli faction barred associated mosques around the country from the elections.

President Museveni, however, was understood to have legitimised the elections by siding with Mubajje on the exercise and directing the police to provide security for participants. The Kibuli faction is aggrieved. To them, Museveni is going against the spirit of their gentleman’s agreement.

“We have met Museveni on seven occasions. On one of them, he pledged to help sort out the leadership wrangles, but only after his election in 2011. But what has he done instead? [He has] sided with Mubajje, the thief!” charged Mohammed Kisambira, the faction’s secretary general.

Fearless

“You should stop intimidating us. You can only jail or kill us,” the burly Muzaata bellowed, as barbs continued raining at Museveni.

“I urge all you Muslims to be firm. We are ready to die. I am going to inform you of the day and time we shall storm Old Kampala. You should be ready. They will kill some of us, but others will continue with the struggle,” Muzaata charged, as the worshipers chorused,

“Allah Akbar!” (God is great).

About three yards away, Prince Kassim Nakibinge, Kampala Lord Mayor Erias Lukwago, Kawempe South MP, Latif Ssebaggala, and other dignitaries listened quietly, occasionally breaking into a smirk, possibly out of admiration for the fearless Muzaata. Not yet done, Muzaata further charged that there is overwhelming proof that Museveni and his government have marginalised and impoverished the Muslim community.

“They have taken everything, and we still think they are our friends? What more should they do to prove that they are our enemies? You should stop participating in any government programmes. Museveni has fooled us for far too long. To him, there is no lesser person in this world than a Muslim,” Muzaata said.

By this time, the gathering was already charged, only waiting for a spark. And they did not have to wait for long. Sheikh Hassan Kirya, the Kibuli faction publicist, asked them to stand up to prove that they are not lame. They did, and never sat again. Shouting on top of their voices, the worshipers said they were only waiting for a go ahead to storm Old Kampala, the seat of the Mubajje faction.

Anxiety filled the air. The leaders engaged in some pep talk. The charged crowed waited with bated breath. At 3:20pm, it was announced that the march to Old Kampala was on. And down they went, descending Kibuli hill and marching towards Nsambya and onto Clock Tower, where Police’s riot squad intervened before the situation went out of hand.

At Old Kampala, Military Police had already surrounded the mosque, firing live bullets in the air, while riot police hurled canisters of teargas. The number of Muslims arrested could not be readily verified. Back in Kibuli, another sheikh, Umar Sudiq Ndaula, also blamed Museveni for the woes in the Muslim community.

“Behind all of this is no one, but the government. There is no one responsible but this government. I want to assure you that Museveni and all his people are the ones behind all of this. We were one community, but this government connived with Mubajje to change the titles to our land,” Ndaula said.

He urged Muslims to stop engaging Museveni. “Let him talk to Mubajje!”

Luweero district chairperson, Abdul Nadduli, was also added to the enemy list for telling Museveni during a State House meeting that the Kibuli faction is led by rebels. Perhaps Nadduli’s most unforgivable crime in the eyes of the Kibuli community was to say that Prince Nakibinge should be questioned for selling the entire Kibuli hill. Nakibinge, heir to Prince Badru Kakungulu, is revered in the Muslim community, where he is fondly referred to as the grandfather of Islam in Uganda. Nadduli, however, distanced himself from the accusations.
“I am not the custodian of the Kibuli land titles,” he told The Observer.

Genesis

Back in 2006, a group of Muslims dragged Mubajje to court, accusing him of fraudulently disposing of Muslim property to businessmen Hassan Basajjabalaba and Drake Lubega. The properties included three plots: two on William Street and another at Old Kampala. Although a commission of inquiry had been set up prior to the court action, its work was frustrated.

The Chief Magistrate’s court at Buganda Road acquitted Mubajje of theft charges but accused him of lying to the Muslim community. His accusers had wanted him convicted of theft and punished. Since then, they have been opposed to his leadership, saying he is no longer fit to be Mufti. A parallel leadership was set up in Kibuli led by Kayongo, who was enthroned as Supreme Mufti.


hbogere@observer.ug

SOURCE: http://www.observer.ug/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18447:muskim-war-on-museveni&catid=78:topstories&Itemid=116

Poor attendance of Elections is a big blow to Mubajje who has broken all the promises he made!

Standard

Assalamu alaikum,
Old Kampala and Kibuli have no other differences other than leadership. They all hold last funeral rights, Mauled, tahalil and tarakain, etc…So they are easy to reconcile. So the President should ensure that constitutional and electoral reforms are done and an acceptable Electoral Commission is put in place.

According to our New vision correspondents, about 800 Muslims attended juma prayer at Old Kampala national mosque. Registered voters are about 240. Only 45 voted. In the rest of Kampala, it was a total black out, the same with Masaka, with an exception of Rakai, Butambala, Kabasanda and Bugiobango.

It is only in Mayuge and Bugiri in Busoga, that there was reasonable participation where even Shias or Shites and non Muslims including drunkards, participated in some isolated areas. We have details in Bukedde tomorrow.

The President has today met only Kibuli group and all the details will be in Saturday Bukedde and Saturday Vision. The gist is that the president has said that he will weigh the turnout of today’s election to know how heavy Mufti Mubajje is. He however cautioned Kibuli not to block Old Kampala supporters from voting, which was poorly concluded yesterday any way.

UMSC constitution was made in 1972 and amended in 1986 not in 1971, just for record purposes. In the sixties we had NAAM, which, despite it good intentions, was an imposition to Ugandan Muslims but the illegitimate government of Obote l dictatorship that had abolished the 1962 Independence constitution during 1966-7 crisis.

In the eighties, there was application of force during Mulumba-Kamulegeya wrangles and we had thought that it had stopped. Now the most popular Shaban mubajje is protected by police from not being harmed by his Muslim flock. Mukama atusaasire.

Uganda Muslim Supreme Council must be for all Muslims in Uganda. They are all stakeholders. But now the clique at Old Kampala, just like the previous cliques, wants to use a winner take all strategy, to entrench themselves at the expense of others. When we ask for constitutional and electoral reforms they don’t listen. When Mubajje was politically campaigning for the post of Mufti, my sister Mariam Nakalema was his press woman. They moved the whole country and he was interested in referring to him as Mbale District Qadhi of all factions. He promised to do away with a Mufti leading up to the age of 75 years. He wanted a five year term, and a limit of two terms.

Upon election, he set up a constitutional review commission that never worked. In 2005, l came from United States and found him organizing a dinner for Muslims. l asked him to ensure that election of Muslim Council take place if UMSC was to get legitimacy and credibility it deserved. l had heard rumors that they were going to postpone themselves.Indeed they postponed themselves which was not even catered for in the constitution.It was during that illegitimate period that they started selling Muslim property.

Mubajje is not the only one that has tried to be Mufti for life. The framers of the constitution wanted it that way, but the late Sheikh Abadarazak Matovu lasted as Chief Qadfi for only two years. His successor the late Sheikh Suleiman Yusuf Matovu was also quietly removed by the late Idi Amin Dada.

By the way, the first UMSC administration was implicated in corruption. Amin did not convene a General Assembly. He just sacked them. When they resisted, he deployed military police and some of them escaped through windows. He named Suleiman Yusuf Matovu Mufti.

After the fall of Idi Amin regime, UNLF did not want to do with UMSC.
It’s military commission chairperson, Paulo Muwanga, went to Kibuli and told Prince Kakungulu Badru to head Muslims. Kakungulu declined saying that Muslims formed UMSC. He appointed Kassim Mulumba as Acting Chief Qadhi. But other groups like Africa Muslim Community Bukoto Nateete and Juma and Zukuri Sect were revived. Those are the owners of traditional mosques throughout the country. Majority of mosques in Bugisu belong to Bukoto Nateete.

Mulumba, who was a stooge of Paulo Muwanga, fell out with Kibuli and they named Sheikh Kivumbi Chief Qadhi. That was in 1980. Then in 1981, Kibuli named Kamulegeya Chief Qadhi. The Muslim World League came in through Kasamullah mubarak Zaid.

Mubarak Zaid deal of 1982 was short leaved, when Mulumba resigned and was replaced by Kamulegeya. Then he wanted to return and he could not. He waited for the okellos coup and made his own coup. Then NRM/NRA came in, and the two were reconciled in Mecca which paved way for an interim administration.

Elections were held and Luwemba was denied victory. He mobilized other Muslim sects and factions and they formed Uganda joint Council of Muslim Organizations under the late Sheikh Zaid Mugenyiasooka, to replace UMSC. He appointed the then chief Qadhi, Sheik Rajab Kakooza, his Secretary General.That is why in 1991, it was Mugenyiasooka that presided over the swearing in of Luwemba.

We should also remember the Mbarara conference of 1993. Prior to it, OIC and Muslim World League intervened and all Muslim stake holders were involved.

Since Mubajje has not changed UMSC for better but for worse, and since he has not been different from past leaders, it is high time we do away with UMSC. MUBAJJE, WHO DOES NOT WANT TO MAKE REFORMS AND ACCOMODATE OTHERS, and who do not want accountability and transparency, should form his own organization. He should not base at Old Kampala because that is property of all Muslims. Then we shall start afresh.

But practically, we can borrow from how our colleagues in Kenya and Tanzania do. In Kenya, there is a Muslim Supreme Council of Kenya under a chairperson. In Tanzania they have a similar organization. In Kenya, a Chief Qadhi is at a level of a High Court Judge and is appointed by Judicial Service Commission in consultation with the Supreme Council of Kenya. There are also District Qadhis appointed in the same way. He is both a spiritual and judicial leader. This is because under Kenya constitution, Qadhis courts are catered for to deal with marriage, divorce and inheritance.

Even under our own constitution, Qadhis courts are catered for. But there is not yet a law for operationalising them. We should have a Chief Qadhi at a level of a High Court Judge. We should have have Regional Qadhis and District Qadhis, all appointed by Judicial Service Commission in consultation with UMSC or a similar body. These are supposed to be graduates of secular law and shariah.
We should remember that prior to 2000 elections, Mubajje was advocating for four Regional Chief Qadhis. He wanted to be in charge of the east. He abandoned it upon becoming Mufti. We had Regional Qadhis in 1972 and Sheikh Zaid Mugenyiasooka was Regiona Qadhi Buganda Region. Busoga should have one, then Eastern one, Western , Southern, Northern and West Nile. Karamoja may be part of Northern or part of Eastern or even it may link up with Teso to have North Eastern.

The Mufti should be only a spiritual leader as Sheikh Shwaib Ssemakula and Sheikh Abdarazak Matovu were. We should avoid another Mufti being taken to court for criminal charges as it was the case with Mubajje. Fonder organizations of UMSC like Kibuli,Bukoto-Nateete-Wandegeya, Kawempe, and new ones like SPIDIQA and Tabligh or Salaf, should make a board of trusties under Prince Kassim Nakibinge Kakungulu to cater for our property.

Bukoto Nateete has a similar body. UMSC is not for an individual or a group of a few individuals. It is for all Muslims of Uganda. If not, people will form their own Supreme Councils as Kibuli did it recently and named a Supreme Mufti. But Old Kampala is not for Mubajje faction only. It is for all Muslims. If mubajje cannot listen to others, and make reforms, He should form his own faction and Old Kampala remain for us all.

AHMED KATEREGA
SENIOR JOURNALIST- NEWVISION
UMBS MEMBER

UMSC should be abolished if Mubajje doesn’t Leave Immediately

Standard

Police direct arrested muslims to climb aboard the police pick-up. They were attempting to walk to Gaddafi National Mosque to confront a rival faction ahead of UMSC elections. Photo by Faiswal Kasirye.

Police direct arrested muslims to climb aboard the police pick-up. They were attempting to walk to Gaddafi National Mosque to confront a rival faction ahead of UMSC elections. Photo by Faiswal Kasirye.

If Old Kampala leaders don’t mend their ways and make peace with their fellow Kibuli group, UMSC should be abolished and we start afresh. I think the attackers were not good conspirators. Master minding a coup at Old Kampala is not new; remember how the late Sheikh Kassim Mulumba did so in 1985 after a successful coup by the Okellos.

According to our correspondents in town, no sooner Hadi Kibuli army set off for Old Kampala, than most of the officials at Old Kampala took off for their dear lives. According to these reporters, if police did not come for their rescue, Old Kampala people would have been history at the national mosque. But a religious leader should not be imposed or consolidated by the state. He should be a man of the people. Any way no Mufti or Chief Qadhi had ever clocked 75 while still in office.
Kibuli people are not good conspirators. They learnt nothing from 1971 and 1985 coups. A small group should, under disguise, have sneaked at the UMSC headquarters and national mosque. The first thing would have gone to Radio Bilal studios and announce the coup and tell other to keep indoors and surrender. Then the other small groups take other strategic installations as the uprising from town come in. The rest would have been history.

But it seems Kibuli did not intend to take over, but to show their position of an active boy to tomorrow’s so called election. No election can be legitimate when a big section of the electorate boycot. We have 1961 elections where Buganda boycotted. Many of my friends like Haji Nsereko Mutumba and Haji Jaffir Mugerwa ring me to tell us, not to bother with their elections. Then they should not call themselves UMSC. THEY SHOULD CALL THEMSELVES SOMETHING PRIVATE. But with UMSC where every Muslim is a stakeholder, we will not allow them to lead us without our mandate. The underlying factor is to amend rules of the game. If that fails, then UMSC which was formed by government, for political expediency, should be abolished.

Old Kampala people say that those who are opposed to election should go to sleep and leave others to elect. Then that will not be UMSC. It will be something else. If Mubajje and his adherents don’t want to change rules of the game, let them form their own faction other than disguising as UMSC when they don’t have our mandate.UMSC was formed by the late President Idi Amin Dada, for political expedience, and if there is no accountability, transparency and popular participation, it should be abolished.

UMSC Old Kampala lost legitimacy when it failed to hold General Assemebly elections in 2005 and instead postponed to 2010. Such an assembly and its organs be Executive Committee or Management, are illegal and illegitimate. Mubajje promised to make constitutional and electoral reforms which he did not fufil.

If there is no general assembly, at least, for legitimate purposes, the old Electoral Commission should have been invited to do what it did in 2000. But mubajje jumped out of the talks with Kibuli and announced his own commission. If UMSC has failed to get targets of its founder, the late Idi Amin in 1971, an umbrella organisation for all Muslims but not a sect or a faction of its own as Mubajje and his admirers want us to believe, it should be abolished.

l am not ashamed of mu Bannabuddu tribe and Baganda nationality. There is also no doubt that Baganda played a big role in Islamisation and evangelization in Uganda. That is why l am for Regional Qadhis, which even your own Mubajje advocated for before he was elected Mufti. We had those Regional Qadhis between 1972 and 1974. The Roam Catholic Chirch has come out with four arch dioceses. If you want to be a leader of UMSC, you must get the mandate of all the Muslims of Uganda. Amin formed it as an umbrella body but not for one clique. If you want to be leaders of your own, form something else but not UMSC.

Muslims have all along trying to correct the wrongs, but they have failed due to arrogance of those in leadership almost all of them except the late Sheikh muhammad Ssemakula, and late Sheikh Abadarazak Matovu, and at times in alliance with government, which is after dividing and ruling Muslims.

Who is a Sheikh?

l think one can be a sheikh by being an ullama, or by being an elder be a king, prince or clan or family leader, or by being rich or being old in age. l think in all these, the above mentioned people may be sheikhs. Then we also know that most of our traditional sheikhs are “kabalaza” who went to homes of tutors and got tutorials. Formal training abroad is a new phenomenon even formal classes in Uganda started by the late Sheikh Abadarazak Matovu at Bilal Islamic Institute, Bwaise in 1965. l think the most important is for some body to be a Muwalimu or Imaam because that is for only an ullama. But, to an extent, l agree that a sheikh should be worth his salt. We have both formal and informal education. Most of our sheikhs pass through informal education, which we also value and treasure.

Ahmed Katerega
Seniour journalist at Newvision
Member of UMBS

Prof.Mukwanason Hyuha takes his ‘guns’ out to fight ‘enemies’ in the IUIU battle

Standard

Professor Mukwanason Hyuha

Professor Mukwanason Hyuha

I am extremely grateful to the Government of the Republic of Uganda for appointing its representatives to the IUIU Council—representatives who include me.

Whoever knows and clearly understands me has no doubts that I will positively contribute a great deal to the academic and other activities of IUIU—just like I did and have done for the University of Dar es Salaam (1980-1990), Makerere University (1993-2000),, the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) covering the entire Sub-Saharan Africa, with headquarters in Nairobi (2001-2010) and Kampala International University (KIU) (2010- to date), to mention but a few institutions where I have been instrumental in capacity building, education administration and academic and other infrasturactural developments.

However,I and many persons as well as alumni of IUIU are tremendously surprised by the baseless allegations that have lately appeared in some sections of the media directed at me and Mr. Mahiri Balunywa, another new appointee to the IUIU Council. These allegations have been made in mosques in Kampala, the Bukedde TV, the Red Pepper, and a few radio stations. The source of the allegations appears to be a few individuals apparently threatened, for reasons best known by themselves, by my appointment and that of Mr. Balunywa.

The purpose of this write-up is to give the correct information on some of the allegations. I believe there is a hidden agenda aimed at tarnishing my otherwise excellent image and integrity, attributes earned out of my hard work and dedicated, selfless service to all institutions where I have worked. The naked truth must be revealed so as to shame the devil and its heinous disciples that are behind the malicious allegations

  1. 1.     My International Profile/Exposure

I honestly believe that I am one of the best known international figures amongst the Muslims in Uganday positions as the Associte Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences of the University of Dar es Salaam and as a good teacher and researcher at the same university (1980-1990), as the Academic Registrar of Makerere University (1993-2000), and as a researcher, teacher and PhD Manager while with the African Economic Research Consortium (2001-2010) made me known all over Sub-Saharan Africa and beyond. These positions enabled me visit and interact with virtually all universities in Sub-Saharan Africa. There is, therefore, hardly any country I have not been to as far as Sub-Saharan Africa is concerned. Moreover, I have been an External Examiner in Economics in many universities in Eastern and Southern Africa. In summary:

  • Worked with the African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) from 2001 to 2010. The AERC runs research and graduate training programmes in Economics. It is funded by over 15 donor countries and organisations
  • Visited annually all the OIC member countries in Africa while with the AERC. My docket included collaborating with universities in Sub-Saharan Africa as well as lecturers and professors of Economics in the running of Master’s and PhD degrees in the region. There is hardly any country in the said region which I have not visited to date.
  • Recognised as one of the best Monetary Economists in Sub-Saharan Africa. I have taught Macroeconomics, Monetary Economics, Econometrics and Research Methodology at the University of Dar es Salaam (1980-1990), University of Zambia (1984 for 4 months), Makerere University (1993-2000), the AERC (1993-1998 and 2002-2009) and KIU (currently).
  • Worked in Tanzania (over 10) years and Kenya (over 8 years) and Zambia (4 months).


  1. 2.     My Integrity

My personal integrity is beyond question This is why I have worked with international organisations like the AERC. Whoever read a series of articles published by the Sunday Monitor newspaper between March 22 and April 15, 2008. I did discuss some of the problems afflicting Makerere University at that time. In his reactions to the publications, the spokesman for the university commented, among other things, that I had no moral authority to give my views on the university “given the way I had departed from Makerere. In a rejoinder to my earlier articles, I took liberty to comment on this Makerere saga; I did comprehensively comment on most of the concocted allegations leveled against me. As a result, I deflated the allegations and showed that I had the moral authority, right and integrity to discuss any issues at the university and elsewhere. It does appear, unfortunately, that those that, in broad daylight, still insist that my integrity is questionable either have never read these articles in the Sunday Monitor, or they know the truth but are bent on misleading the public mainly for selfish interests and malicious reasons

I was a member of the Appointments and Disciplinary Committee of the IUIU from 1991 to 2002. I continued being a member of the Committee even after I had left Makerere University. Why was my integrity not questioned then, rather than now, ten years later? There must be a hidden agenda! Are the powers-to-be in IUIU using me to fight their private wars or to clean their dirty deeds or linen (if any)? They should stop this character-assassination before my lawyers catch up with them in due course. In summary:

  • After departure from Makerere University, I worked for another two years up-to 2002 on the IUIU Appointments and Disciplinary Committee, making a total of 10 years as member of the said IUIU Committee. If my integrity was not questioned by IUIU and others at that time, why is it being questioned now:10 years later? There must be a hidden agenda, nothing to do with integrity.
  • I worked for the AERC for about nine years. AERC is an international academic organisation financed by over fifteen (15) donors. I started and run a Collaborative PhD programme in Economics covering the entire Sub-Saharan Africa. No donor or any other participant ever questioned my integrity; instead, they all appreciated my teamwork, my innovative ability and immense contribution, given the fact that I am an extremely hardworking individual, Makerere University and other institutions where I have worked can attest to this.
  • I worked at the University of Dar es Salaam for over ten years in various capacities including being a member of the University Senate. While there, I rose to the academic rank of Associate Professor. Again nobody ever doubted mt integrity.
  • I have been working as Deputy Vice Chancellor (Academic Affairs), Kampala International University (KIU) where I am a member of the University Senate and the University Council since 2010. Again there my integrity has never been questioned
  • Lastly, I have served as a member of the General Assembly and the Executive Committee of the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council (UMSC) since the year 2000, The UMSC is a Muslim institution, like the IUIU. My record there speaks for itself and my integrity has never been questioned.

3.   My Unquestionable Belief in Islam

  • I, son of the late Al-Hajji Sheikh Asumani Wandera Muhwana, have been a Muslim since birth. I come from one of the biggest Muslim families in Eastern Uganda. You cannot have a non-Muslim member on the General Assembly or the Executive Committee of UMSC. Again the question of I being a non-Muslim would have been raised in 2000 when I was elected and joined the General Assembly and the Executive Committee of the UMSC, NOT now!

4.  Hyuha:  The Innovator and Thinker

  • He managed the construction of the famous Senate Building at Makerere University without a single cent from the University’s development budget or the donor community—but from funds internally generated by the Department of the Academic Registrar where I was the then chief executive officer.

5.  My Record at Makerere University

  • I contributed in no small way to the development of various academic programmes, staff development, private sponsorship schemes and the administration of Makerere University while I was there. Even when I left, I successfully worked with the AERC to bring the CMAP to the university and sponsor over 8 academicians up to PhD (Economics) level. Many of these academicians I trained are members of the university academic staff.
  • On concocted allegations preferred against me, see my answers in articles that appeared in the Sunday Monitor newspaper from about mid-March to mid-April, 2008. These were another set of concocted, baseless allegations, possibly with another hidden agenda. In any case, no criminal charges were preferred against me.

6.  My Expected Work at the IUIU Council

  • To ensure rapid progress of the academic staff.  A University which started in 1988 should have many professors by now; it appears to date there is no professor on the academic staff.
  • Academic standards have to be improved
  • Research must be immensely improved for it appears right now very little research is going on at the university. Hence, one gets hardly any academic publications or journal articles emanating from the university. As Hyuha stated in 1992 while attending the fourth anniversary of the university, “A university without research is just a glorified secondary school”. IUIU must start appearing among the best 100 universities in Africa.
  • To work with everybody as a team without fear or fever. In this respect, nobody should expect to be victimized by Prof. Hyuha, or, for that matter by any other member of the new Council.
  • Those who work hard will be appropriately rewarded; those who need mentoring will be mentored; and those who need learning and/or sensitization will be taught and/or sensitized.

Hence, if one states that Prof. Hyuha has no international exposure, there must be a hidden agenda, or else one does not know what he/she is talking about. My curriculum vitae is very rich (see attached short c.v. below).

Hyuha’s Resume

Mukwanason A. Hyuha

April 2012

What is Political Islam

Standard

by Charles Hirschkind

published in MER205

Over the last few decades, Islam has become a central point of reference for a wide range of political activities, arguments and opposition movements. The term “political Islam” has been adopted by many scholars in order to identify this seemingly unprecedented irruption of Islamic religion into the secular domain of politics and thus to distinguish these practices from the subsumed in Western scholarship under the unmarked category “Islam.” In the brief comments that follow, I suggest why we might need to rethink this basic framework.

The claim that contemporary Muslim activities are putting Islam to use for political purposes seems, at least in some instances, to be warranted. Political parties such as Hizb al-‘Amal in Egypt or the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) in Algeria that base their appeal on their Islamic credentials appear to exemplify this instrumental relation to religion. Yet a problem remains, even in such seemingly obvious examples: In what way does the distinction between the political and nonpolitical domains of social life hold today? Many scholars have argues that “:political Islam” involves an illegitimate extension of the Islamic tradition outside of the properly religious domain it has historically occupied. Few, however, have explored this trend in relations to the contemporaneous expansion of state power and concern into vast domains of social life previously outside its purview — including that of religion.

As we know, through this ongoing process central to modern nation building, such institutions as education, worship, social welfare and family have been incorporated to carrying degrees within the regulatory apparatuses of the modernizing state. Whether in entering into the business contracts, selling wares on the street, disciplining children, adding a room to a house, in all births, marriages, deaths — at each juncture the state is present as overseer or guarantor, defining limits, procedures and necessary preconditions.

As a consequence, modern politics and the forms of power it deploys have become a condition for the practice of many personal activities. As for religion, tot he extent that the institutions enabling the cultivation of religious virtue become subsumed within (and transformed by) legal and administrative structures liked to the state, the (traditional) project of preserving those virtues will necessarily be “political” if it is to succeed. Within both public and private school in Egypt, for example, the curriculum is mandated by the state: those wishing to promote or maintain Islamic pedagogical practices necessarily have to engage political power.

This does not mean that all forms of contemporary Islamic activism involve trying to “capture the state.” The vast majority of these movements involve preaching and other da‘wa (missionary) activities, alms giving, providing medical care, mosque building, publishing and generally promoting what is considered in the society to be public virtue through community action. Nonetheless, these activities engage the domain we call the political both in the sense that they are subject to restrictions imposed by the state (such as licensing), and in so much as they must often compete with state or state-supported institutions (pedagogic, confessional, medical) promoting Western models of family, worship, leisure and social responsibility. The success of even a conservative project to preserve a traditional form of personal piety will depend on its ability to engage with the legal, bureaucratic, disciplinary and technological resources of modern power that shape contemporary societies.

This argument diverges from the common one that Islam fuses religion and politics, din wa dawla, in a way incompatible with Western analytical categories. It is worth noting, however, that this frequently heard claim does not deny the fact that Muslim thinkers draw distinctions between dinand dawla, only that the specific domains designated by these terms, and the structure of their interrelations do not mirror the situation in Europe in regard to European states and the Church. Moreover, this leaves aside the fact that the division between religious and political domains even in Western societies has always been far more porous than was previously assumed, as much recent work has made clear. [1] Indeed, as Tocqueville long ago observed, Protestant Christianity plays an extremely important role in US politics in setting the moral boundaries and concerns within which political discussion unfolds, and hence can be considered the premiere political institution in some sense. I do not refer here to the lobbying efforts of church groups and other religious advocacy associations, but rather to the way a pervasive Christianity has been to varying degrees a constitutive element of Western political institutions. What is clear, in any case, is that greater recognition must be given to the way Western concepts (religion, political, secular, temporal) reflect specific historical developments, and cannot be applied as a set of universal categories or natural domains.

Lastly, although discussions of political motivation or class interest should continue to be important parts of accounts of contemporary Islam, they are not necessarily germane to a description of every problem the analyst poses. Statements like the following have too long beende rigueur in accounts of the Islamic sahwa (awakening): “Marginalized male elites experience socioeconomic disparities as cultural loss, and they are drawn to participate in fundamentalist cadres in order to militate against nationalist structures that they deplore as un-Islamic because they are, above all, ineffective.” [2] Such analyses reduce the movements to an expression of the socioeconomic conditions which gave rise to them. The “marginalized male elites” speak nothing new to us, as their arguments and projects, once properly translated into the language of political economy, seem entirely familiar. Lost, in other words, is any sense of the specificity of the claims and reasoning of the actors. This is brushed aside as we reiterate what we already know about the universal operation of socioeconomic disparities.

Grasping such complexity will require a much more subtle approach than one grounded in a simple distinction between (modern) political goals and (traditional) religious ones. Terms such as “political Islam” are inadequate here as they frame our inquiries around a posited distortion or corruption of properly religious practice. In this way, the disruptive intrusions or outright destruction enacted upon society by the modernizing state never even figure in the analysis. In contrast, the various attempts of religious people to respond to that disruption are rendered suspect, with almost no attempt to distinguish those instances where such a critical stance is warranted from those where it is not. It is not surprising, in this light, that militant violence and public intolerance have become the central issues of so many studies of al-sahwa al-islamiyya(Islamic awakening), while the extensive coercion and torture practiced by governments get relegated to a footnote.

Author’s Note: I wish to thank Talal Asad, Saba Mahmood, Hussein Agrama, Steve Niva and Lisa Hajjar for their comments and suggestions on this brief article. Its shortcomings are my responsibility alone.

Endnotes

>[1] See William Connolly, The Ethos of Pluralization (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1995).
[2] Bruce Lawrence, The Defenders of God: The Fundamentalist Revolt Against the Modern Age(Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1995), p. 226.

 

TOWARDS RESOLVING THE LEADERSHIP CRISIS AT UGANDA MUSLIM SUPREME COUNCIL

Standard


By

Omar Dawood Kalinge -Nnyago

 

EARLIER EFFORTS BY MUSLIM STUDENTS AND PROFESSIONALS AT PROVIDING SOLUTIONS TO THE LEADERSHIP CRISIS AT UMSC

Background:

After several weeks of deliberations, on July, 01, 2010, the following organizations issued a press statement in which they spelled out their proposal  to solve the leadership impasse at the UMSC. THESE PROPOSALS WERE NOT GIVEN ANY CONSIDERATION AT THE TIME, BUT NO ONE CAME OUT TO OPPOSE THEM.  Now it seems that there is chance for new initiatives. Make your contribution as well. We capture the text of the proposals for your individual study and comments.

  • UGANDA MUSLIM PROFESSIONALS FORUM (Think Tank)
  • UGANDA MUSLIM YOUTH ASSEMBLY (Registered Charity)
  • MUSLIM STUDENTS ASSOCIATION OF UGANDA (Registered Student organization)
  • MUSLIM CONSULTATIVE FORUM (Think Tank)
  • UGANDA MUSLIM WOMEN’S VISION (Registered NGO/charity)

THE PROPOSAL

a)      The present UMSC leadership should resign immediately and unconditionally

b)      An Interim Administration should be put in place immediately, composed of  a balanced team of eminent Muslim personalities with sound Islamic education and high academic and Islamic moral standing.

c)      The Interim Administration should have only the following posts: Acting Mufti, Acting Deputy Mufti, Acting Secretary General, Acting Secretary for Finance and Planning, Acting Public Relations Officer, Acting Secretary for Education, Ag. Secretary for Social Services, Acting Secretary for Religious Affairs. All the current organs of the UMSC should be held in “active abeyance” until a new constitution is in place, and should be available for consultations. The District Kadhis and Sheikh Twales should retain their posts pending new elections in two years’ time.

d)     The Interim Administration should be paid a modest monthly allowance to meet their basic personal needs and be given financial facilitation to enable them carry out their official duties for the two year period.

e)      These personalities, who will form the Interim Administration  (in “b” above) should be compelled to undertake in writing never to participate in any future election of Muslim officials before 10 years have elapsed. This will ensure that they carry out their duties as selflessly as possible, as a sacrifice to their community. All the changes they will propose shall be for the good of the community but not intended to benefit their future ambitions.

f)       The interim administration will be charged with reviewing and amending the UMSC constitution, setting up UMSC management systems, organizing elections and installing a new Mufti elected under the new constitution at the expiry of the two years.

We welcome all Muslims to give their views on this proposal.

Signed:

Omar Dawood Kalinge-Nnyago                                                                         CONVENOR                                                                                              

MUSLIM CONSULTATIVE FORUM

WHO CAN MANAGE UGANDA MUSLIM SUPREME COUNCIL( BY OMAR KALINGE)?

Standard

ISLAM IN UGANDA

Conflict in Uganda Muslim Supreme Council

WHO HAS THE CAPACITY TO MANAGE THE UMSC?

Omar Dawood Kalinge

Convenor, Muslim Consultative Forum

May 29, 2009

Omar Kalinge

Here we are again, in the midst of incessant Muslim wrangles. We have been there before and got out, by the grace of Allah. We shall overcome them again, insha-Allah. It is embarrassing to all of us, whichever side you find yourself on. There are some Muslims, though, who have decided not to be part of the ongoing confusion. This is not being indifferent, but a conscious decision not to fuel the divisions but at the same time work overtly and covertly, to see whether we can manage the situation so that it does not go out of hand.

This is the thrust and approach of the Muslim Consultative Forum, a think tank of some few willing Muslims with interest of the dignity and wellbeing of the of the Muslim Community at heart, and are not eager to become officials of the UMSC in its present form, at any level. So, the Muslim Consultative Forum is not a faction of the Muslim community, but a strategic effort to shape the future of the Muslim Community in Uganda.

The crisis in UMSC is a symptom of a serious deficiency of organisational, leadership and management capacity. Whoever takes over UMSC, with the present pathetic absence of organisational systems, inadequate organisational skills at most levels of the organisation, and less than desirable individual competencies, would find themselves in the same quagmire.

In my other occupation as a consultant on Organisational Development we have tried to study some other Muslim organisations in Uganda, even those that seem to be run by the better educated. Most suffer from the same syndrome that UMSC suffers. There are just no systems in place in these organisations. There is no transparency. Individuals are bigger than their organisations. There is also the lingering disturbing tendency to establish cliques within the organisations. Selfishness. Feeling more important than others. No budgets are prepared for planning purposes (except for begging from donors). Therefore no audited accounts or even balance sheets are read at the end of the year. They don’t hold annual General Meetings, they run even large sounding organisations like any brief case association would be. No accountability.

So, even if you handed over UMSC (in its present form), to the most educated, the most agreeable (to you), the most enlightened (in your opinion), they will not be able to run the organisation the way Idi Amin, the grand strategist, who created UMSC had wanted it to be. UMSC was supposed to be an alternative government for the Muslim Community. To be an effective top leader of UMSC, you should be presidential material as well. Muslims in Uganda are over 6 million. Even if they were only 2.9 million as the official figures state, we know of countries with populations of under 300,000. Iceland has 290,000 inhabitants, but is a major donor to Uganda.

Uganda’s true Muslim population is larger than the total population of many countries. So the idea of some Mufti, whether you like him or not, who does not have the capacity to be president of a country is absurd. Muftis in Uganda think their job is to officiate at functions, be nice to the government so that he can get a car and a perhaps a diplomatic passport, and to be welcomed in all parts of Uganda to attend Maulids and last funeral rights. And to receive unlimited praises from their followers. This is also the role most Muslims define for the Mufti of their choice. This is erroneous.

“Mufti” is an academic title, much like “Professor”. In Uganda, unfortunately, “Mufti” is actually a political position disguised as a religious office. This is a matter that ought to be resolved with time, so that a Mufti in Uganda (as in other countries) is chosen for the knowledge he has and the proven sincerity he has exhibited when traced several years before he became a candidate for the office. This would mean, at another level, that there can be any number of Muftis, just as there can be any number of Professors of chemistry in a given country. In Pakistan I met at least 10 Muftis, and none of them was in conflict with the other.

But let us focus on the “Mufti” of Uganda’s context. The Mufti that Uganda needs in the 21st Century is a well grounded individual in the Islamic sciences with graduate qualification and who is in possession of a sound western education and/or exposure. He who has the capacity to put together a team of Ministerial material to head the various UMSC departments, not some obscure and often incompetent persons whose most important qualification is loyalty to the Mufti and their ability to mobilise political support for the Mufti. In the UMSC we should have, The District Kadhis will have to be properly paid, our schools well run, our health system in place, Mosques should become the LCI structure of the community, and a census of Muslims should be undertaken every decade so that proper (development) planning can be done for the community. Further, the UMSC Secretary General Uganda needs should be equivalent of an executive Prime Minister in a nation.

The Muslim community should have its own economic development blue print, structure, and its own interest free economic base. UMSC should have a foreign relations department run by qualified international relations practitioners, to liaise with the (global) Ummah. The Muslim Community should have a manpower planning department so that our institutions are advised to produce the right products (graduates) we need and in the right quantities, applying the most cost effective education technologies.

I will illustrate this. Today, if the Islamic University in Uganda reduced on the brick and mortar projects (buildings) and instead invested in ICT, it would deliver internationally recognised Degree, Diploma and Certificate programmes through Open and Distance Learning to not less than 50,000 local students a year and another ten thousand or so who live abroad, at half the cost of delivery. Apart from the huge income generation potential of Open and Distance Learning, this would also mean that within 20 years, there would be at least 300,000 more Muslim graduates in the community. (A percentage would drop out of course due to certain known factors).

Also, the debate of whether a Muslim girl should get married before ‘completing studies’ would cease. A Muslim mother in Uganda should be able to complete her undergraduate and graduate degree for the Islamic University in Uganda, from the comfort of her own home, taking care of her children, in front of a laptop, and a modem, at half the social and financial cost of the traditional University Education, which has excluded thousands of students from higher education.

The office of the Mufti of Uganda should be run like a typical President’s office. The UMSC delegates should be at the level of Member of Parliament as far as level of education and analytical capacity are concerned. The General Assembly should be the Muslim Parliament. We can go on.

The present level of debate of who should be Mufti and who should overthrow who – falls short of the realisation that the Muslim Community of Uganda can only be managed like you can manage a fully fledged country. Mediocres cannot run the UMSC, regardless of which faction they belong to.

Can we then raise the debate and confront the Muslim Leadership Question that goes beyond the Sheilk Mubajjes and the Sheikh Kayongos of this world? The Northerners and the Southerners? The only constant qualification should be Taqwa (the fear of Allah). That is non negotiable. And Ikhlas, (sincerity of intentand action). Then we look for presidential and ministerial material to lead the UMSC. If it is not available now, let us consciously work towards producing it, and work to develop ourselves into ministerial material, into presidential material, into MP material, into Permanent Secretary material, into Heads of Department material… into Commissioner material – as we let the available type do what they can at their simple mauledi/lumbe/miggo/stones level, until the right time comes.

Your responsibility now, you who can read and understand this text, is to help all Muslim camps focus on development of their camps factions, not propaganda and simple politics of survival. And to convince the younger people below 40 years not to be involved in matters of history they know very little about. Attempting to have a faction – free Muslim community in Uganda (or elsewhere) is futile. It is much like hoping that the Shia (and all the Shia sects and factions) and Sunni (and all the Sunni sects and factions) would one day merge into one Jamah with one Khalifah in our lifetime.

For Allah’s sake if this ongoing conflict in UMSC can give us another 5 FM Muslim radios, 2 Muslim Television stations, 2 Muslim referral Hospitals, 2 more Muslim Nursing Schools, 500 Muslim postgraduate scholarships, half of them in the sciences, 1000 Islamic Banking SACCOs countrywide, 1000 Muslim police officers and 1000 more Muslim military officers in the next 10 years… I would not complain.

Perhaps the competition between the factions would make them work a little harder, smarter, as we delicately move towards overcoming the negative impact of senseless divisions using the Prophetic method. No Muslim faction in Uganda can vanquish the other. They all have their inherent strengths and weaknesses that place them pathetically at par with each other. In the future, we will attempt to analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the major Muslim factions in Uganda.

Please don’t be part of this confusion. Let no other well educated Muslim be part of it either. Use your position to manage the divisions in a way that they can even become an advantage to the community, and not the tragedy they can become if fuelled by emotion, simple arguments and approaches.


omarkalinge@gmail.com

9 THINGS U CAN DO FOR UMBS/ISLAM IN THE YEARS TO COME

Standard

Assalamu Alaikum,

“I will lose weight this year”; “I will sort out my marriage problems and spend more time with the family”; “I will spend my money more carefully”; ” I will buy my mother a piece of land” –these are just some examples of the kind of resolutions many of us make at various time markers in our lives, most notably, at the beginning of a new year.

But for most Muslims, while the goals we set are usually praiseworthy, few, if any, are aimed at contributing to Islam on a community level. We might, for instance, aim to read more Islamic books or give more in charity. But many of us would not intend to teach at the local weekend Islamic school and share our knowledge or devote our time, not just our money, to a masjid building project. It is time to focus not just on our own personal development. We have to start considering what we can do for Islam in our community and for the Ummah in general.

Below are nine ideas that you can use or simply check out to jumpstart your own thinking and planning process when developing resolutions.


1. Become an unofficial/official Agent for Muslim Unity or UMBS where you live

Muslims need to come together to meet the challenges we face today. A common agenda has been there for several years but we remain divided. For Muslims, unity is not an option but an obligation. If the labor movement, women, and other minorities can organize on the basis of a federation/confederation model to address their common agenda successfully, why have we failed to do that? United we stand, divided we fall. Muslims must come together at the national level for a common Muslim agenda. I request that we all, individually, become agents of unity or Uganda Muslim Brothers & Sisters [UMBS] organisation wherever we are. Here is a list of things you can do:

Find out what your masjid is doing for Muslim unity;

Meet, call, and write to Muslim leaders you know and ask what they are doing to bring Muslims together;

Budget for funds and time you can donate for Muslim unity or to UMBS organisation;

Can you form a network of Muslims in your city who are willing to work for the national unity of Muslims?

Adopt a plan of action for something you can do individually;

Encourage your family members to each open up an email address purposely to join the UMBS forum or join it on facebook( which is very easy). A lot of people have willingly joined UMBS on facebook to learn about their religion and also interract with fellow Muslims.There are now over 6500 members on UMBS facebook page:http://www.facebook.com/groups/ugandamuslimbrotherssis/;

Donate anything that you think may help UMBS organisation to grow or have offices in different parts of the country;

Tactically bring the activities of UMBS in your friends conversations every now and then. This is called free PR.

2. Work with other faith groups

Remember all those nice people of other faiths who came forward to stand with Muslims after the backlash of 9/11 or during the period government arrested Muslims in pretext of crippling the ADF rebels in western Uganda? I love Uganda because of those people. There are millions of good people in Uganda who, despite all the propaganda against Islam, firmly believe that Islam is a religion of peace. Muslims need to work with them to build bridges of understanding in society. Could you do any of the following things?

Volunteer in soup kitchens or homeless shelters run by other faith groups;

Donate to a social justice program in your area;

Learn about their social services programs;

Invite them for Iddil celebrations;

Let their(non-Muslims) children visit your house and treat them with kindness and respect;
Invite their teenages to work in your house and help them to go back to school if you can afford it.

3. Develop writing and communication skills

Yes, it is a cliche to say that Muslims have too many doctors and engineers and not enough writers. But this needs to be said over and over again because it seems we have made little headway as an Ummah in this area. English is the lingua franca of the world, and unless Muslims develop their skills and talents in the field of writing and communicating in this language, we will continue to lose. There are more non-Muslims who have written about Islam and Muslims in Uganda than Muslims. We do not even have good books that can be given out on the issues of jihad, terrorism, underage marriages, Islam and politics, Shiriq and mental illness and women. Sign up for writing classes. Check out your local library or community center for free or low-cost classes and seminars. Read, read, and read. Send a letter to the editor of newspapers in Uganda, write editorials, and more. And if you want to submit your work for the web, please send it to UMBS administrator, Abbey Semuwemba, for publication on UMBS forum, blog or website Insha-Allah!

4. Take care of New Muslims

Takbeer, Allahu Akbar. That is how we welcome a new Muslim in our masjids. But what happens to these Muslims later on? One survey in USA determined that about 50 percent of new Muslims in Illinois and about 65 percent in the state of New York leave Islam within a few years. There are many reasons for this phenomenon, but if we do our duty of properly devoting our personal time and community resources, it will help stem the tide of conversions out of Islam. Help the suffering new muslims to get work or a roof over their heads. Tell them about the UMBS forum and organisation. Don’t be selfish because you somehow think you are not officially part of the organisation. Being a member of UMBS forum is enough to make anyone part of the UMBS organisation. So, let all members learn to help each other and help UMBS achieve its objectives.Don’t silently pray for its downfall.


5. Learn about conflict resolution

Remember the embarassing fights in the masjid or among the Muslim leaders in Uganda? Or, the wonderful active sister who wanted a Muganda man for husband but other UMBS members felt bad about it? What about the brother who was a great teacher at the Islamic university in Mbale until the administration decided to reduce his salary without informing him well in advance, and then he decided to write a damaging process evaluation about Dr. Ssengendo and IIIU? I personally never participated in this debate when it was presented on the forum but i sympathised with Dr. Ssengendo because running an organisation from scratch is not easy at all.

These are all cases where conflict resolution could have come in handy. There is a crying need for Muslims who can negotiate and mediate amongst Muslims. This is a skill every Muslim community needs to invest in. It is also a skill you should consider developing. You could do a degree in conflict resolution if you wish, but you do not have to go that far. You can attend seminars and/or one-day classes. Business schools may offer a course a few weeks long in conflict resolution. Consider mediating a group of people on UMBS forum that have failed to agree over a certain subject under discussion. Consider gaining and taking these skills to the masjid and to your local Islamic center.

6. Increase your time for the masjid

It is easy to drop shilling coins in a masjid donation box, but it is not so easy to devote a couple of hours every few weeks to da’wah to the masjid’s neighborhood. This is something i also find difficult because of what is going on in my life now but i admitedly feel bad about it. I have got such a busy schedule in my life such that i rarely find time to go to a mosque but i feel sad about it.

When was the last time your masjid had an open house? When were your non-Muslim friends invited to attend a party in the masjid? While everyone in masjids is ready to work on a masjid building or a school project, there are very few who are willing to spare time for neighborhood relationship or media communication. Many times, there is no one available to properly handle inquires left on the masjid’s answering machine or Imam’s mobile phone.

Time is our greatest resource, not money. Devote yours to causes that deserve it. Also remember that when you are giving time to the masjid, your inputs and ideas are also more likely to be considered by its administration.


7. Make your Muslim organizations more open to feedback and accountability

Have things been running the same way for years at your local Islamic center? Many, many masjids and Islamic centers lack management and organizational skills. They are run by an elite group of people who make all of the decisions without proper consultation with the community. They are also not held accountable for what they do or how the money coming into the masjid or organization is spent. This does not mean that everything they are doing is wrong. But there needs to be a more transparent and open system that will benefit all Muslims in the community, the male and the female, the young and the old, the immigrant and the Muslim born in Uganda. You can help start the process of change. This has to be done with plenty of wisdom and patience. But you and others will benefit from working to make your Islamic organizations more open and accountable to the community.

8. Adopt a Muslim issue which few pay attention to

This commitment does not have to be for a whole year. It can be only for three months if you like.Bring it on forum for debate using different ways inishallah. The aim is simply to develop a specialization in a specific area of need and benefit to Muslims. One of the best is the marginalisation of muslims in Uganda politics or public service. It is here, it is real, all of those involved in the issue are accessible, and you can see the results of your efforts more easily. But do not stop there. Write a list of muslims you think are fit for cabinet ministrial posts, ambassadors, PS, e.t.c, and then send it with their CVs to UMBS forum or Abbey Semuwemba for the authorities to take notice.

You can also choose other areas of the world and issues that Muslims have ignored or given sparse attention to lately: UMBS causes, environmental issues and domestic violence are all some examples.

9. Plan for Islam in your kids’ classroom and your workplace

Ramadan and Eid are no longer unknown to many non-Muslims in Uganda. They are now mentioned along with Christmas as media coverage of Ramadan this year in the Daily Monitor, Observer and Newvision indicates. That said, though, there would always be the new student, your child’s teacher next year, or a boss and the co-worker who need to know about our celebrations, as well as issues which concern us. One good project to work on is creating more awareness of Islam in schools and the workplace. There are still issues which cause misunderstanding and confusion. The hijab, prayer and Friday prayers are still issues of contention in a number of workplaces and schools.

Invite all to the way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching;
and consult with them in ways that are best and most gracious.
(Al Qur’an, 16:125)

Byebyo ebyange and Wassalam

Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba

HOW ARE MUSLIM SCHOLARSHIPS AWARDED IN UGANDA?

Standard

Someone wanted to find out how scholarships are allocated. The Universities that send scholarships here send them with tests for the beneficiaries. UMSC publishes the availability of the scholarships and announces dates for the regional tests. The test centres include one in: Arua, Mbale, Kampala, Mbarara, Jinja and Lira. Those who apply seat for the tests that are returned to the respective universities, embassies for marking and selection of beneficiaries. Previously, it was a one man show but after anomalies were realized that some of the students were wrongly awarded the scholarships the system changed.

The Mufti once visited Sudan and found students walking the streets; he was told they had been thrown out the university because they were not qualified to be there. He immediately ordered the sacking of Ali Kadugala, the then secretary for Education for abusing the scholarship system.

Previously one person did the allocation. It was discovered that he was giving out scholarships to less competent and under qualified children after getting money from their parents. This information is available on the UMSC notice board respective embassies and representatives of the donor countries. There is no short cut. i know that Sheikh Adam Mbazira, who handle that process is very crafty that is why the institutions that give out the scholarship choose to handle the testing and selections.

Please contact Mr Aman Asimwe, the secretary for works and social services at UMSC on 0772957262. He should be able to give you the contacts of the people they use at the various centers.

Ahmed Wetaka
P.O BOX 2488 Mbale- Uganda
Mobile +256 772 609736

Matovu Abdallah: When West donates drones in Horn of Africa

Standard

Matovu Abdallah: When West donates drones in Horn of Africa
September 19, 2011
In this piece, I am arguing that for its own good and image building, the West has to clean its approach of handling every issue with an iron fist, especially in the Muslim world.

The simple example is on Somalia and its regional neighbours, an area called the Horn of Africa (HoA). While a number of Muslim countries are competing to donate cash, food and medical assistance, some in the “very powerful” West, are busy sending drone planes or picking the bill for their proxy countries fighting the Al Shabaab opposition: Burundi and Uganda. Forget that these two countries are in Somalia under the aegis of the African Union.

Remember, the cash raised from anywhere by anyone has to be vetted by the UN’s Financial Tracking Service (UN FTS) “lest it goes in the hands of terrorists.”

Anyway, the Al Shabaab opposition fighters were not lucky like the Libyans, for the former were simply designated a terrorist group by the USA, UK and of course the UN. This is not to insinuate that aid that goes to Somalia is intended for the Al Shabaab, but it is for the Somali people – many of them are living in Al Shabaab controlled areas.

You need to pause here and reflect on three issues. One, those who donate have to be almost grilled for their donation while the beneficiaries are at the mercy of those who vet donations, the UN FTS.

Two, the trapped Somalis who are in need but in the areas controlled by Al Shabaab have either to starve to death or the donors have to be escorted by the partial “peacekeepers”, Burundi and Uganda who abuse all the rules in the books of peacekeeping under the guise of “clearing the way.” Meanwhile, fighting continues.

Three, can’t there be a solution to this stalemate? It is possible, that is by having the International Community (read the US and the UK) swallow their pride and engage the Al Shabaab opposition fighters into negotiation. It took them ten years to resort to the same with the Taliban in Afghanistan. It is not too late to save over seven million people from dying of hunger.

What I am writing about here is political morality as opposed to political correctness. The Founder and President of the UK based Humanitarian Forum, Dr Hany Al Banna, shares my view.

“The Al Shabaab fighters should not be labelled terrorists. We [humanitarian agencies] can deliver where the government has failed to deliver if we take a neutral and positive approach. We should advocate negotiation.

“What we need is culture and wisdom to stay as permanent players in areas such as Somalia, Chechnya or Kosovo. We need the West’s wisdom and art of negotiation but not money because that we can raise.”

Doesn’t this approach tally well with what the UN Under Secretary General in charge of Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) also Emergency Relief Coordinator, Valerie Amos, noted on Sept.12?

“2011 has been an extraordinary year, presenting aid workers with unprecedented challenges – many of them in the Islamic world,” she told aid agencies from the Middle East and the Muslim world who were sharing information for better humanitarian action in Kuwait City.

“Effective partnership means working closely together to identify needs and determine ways to best meet them for the benefit of the affected communities.” So, the affected communities in Somalia are not interested in hearing more drones sent to them, but aid that reaches. It can only reach when there are peaceful political steps taken.

Unfortunately, like Abraham Maslow observed, “If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail,” the trapped Somalis have little chance of surviving hunger even in the presence of food because the opposition fighters are still viewed as “terrorists unworthy to negotiate with.”

Forget that the current President of the “Interim government of Somalia”, Ahmad Sharif, is among the founders of Al Shabaab which metamorphosed from the Union of Islamic Courts (ICU) which, when still in charge of the country, a foreigner could peacefully drive throughout Somalia. The ICU’s problem before the International Community was: it was too Islamic and “wanted to rule by the Islamic law” in a country where 100 per cent are Muslims.

Now Sharif switched to the interim government, he is a good guy. Again never mind that, like the Eritrean Consul General in Dubai told The Gulf Today in August; “Somalia is for all the Somalis. It does not start and end in (the interim government-controlled capital city of) Mogadishu.” Surely, Al Shabaab has to be brought to the negotiating table when there is still life to protect.

___________________________
The author is of Ugandan origin and a UMBS forumist

A diagnosis of conflicts and factions among the Ugandan Muslims

Standard

By Nkonge Ally Cheune

Introduction:

This paper aims at examining the various conflicts and factions that have existed in the Muslim Community in B/uganda from the time Islam was introduced in 1844 to the present day (2009). It will Endeavour to investigate the causes of conflicts at the level of both professed and non professed motives, the means and attempts made to resolve conflict in each case, the results, and the overall effects to the Muslim community in B/Uganda. It is important to note that in a period of 175 years that Islam has existed in B/Uganda, 143 years have been characterized by conflict and friction between factions, with small spells of peace and unity once in a while.

Islam was spread to the various parts of the World following Prophet Mohamed’s tradition which compelled each of his companions to transmit even a single word heard from him to the rest of the communities. This tradition became very instrumental for each Muslim to transmit the message to others regardless of the level of knowledge one had attained. Nevertheless, the companions always respected those members of the society whom they considered more knowledgeable among themselves and hence the less knowledgeable could never oppose their superiors.

During the time of Prophet Mohamed, any conflict or doubt among Muslims was straight away referred to him for guidance. It became a tradition that after the death of the Prophet, the first two caliphs were taken as the points of reference in carrying forward his mission. The Muslims, however, knew that the caliphs were not prophets and therefore could be opposed in case of difference in opinion. Hence in the reign of Uthman, the third caliph, opposition emerged which symbolized the beginning conflict in the early Muslim Community in Arabia.

Islam in B/uganda

Kabaka Suuna II as a Muslim Leader

Islam reached B/Uganda about 1200 years after the death of Prophet Mohamed (PBUH), when some minor differences in the interpretation of the Qur’an and Hadith had already emerged, and different approaches in spreading Islam were being applied. Differences in opinion on some minor issues had developed to the extent of creating sects in the Muslim community. The first conflict that erupted among the Muslims in B/Uganda was based on the differences in the approach of spreading Islam.

Ahmad bin Ibrahim led the first group of Arabs who reached the Buganda Kingdom in the year 1844 A.D. during the reign of Kabaka Suuna II. They found the kingdom with a strong culture and a well established political system that rotated around the Kabaka. They identified some strong cultural aspects which were opposed to the teachings of Islam but could be tolerated. Among these was the belief that Kabaka’s blood can never be shed. It implied that the Kabaka could not undergo the rite of circumcision and yet it represented one of the major principles of Islam. Ibrahim and his group considered it possible for a person to embrace Islam without undergoing circumcision. This group of Muslims was able to tolerate Kabaka Suuna II to lead prayers when he was not circumcised.

Mutesa I as the leader of Muslims

After the death of Suuna, Mutesa I inherited the throne but he also remained uncircumcized. He, like his father, learnt the recitation of the Qur’an, performed the five daily prayers, observed the fasting of the month of Ramathan for ten years and eventually declared Islam the official religion of the kingdom. Mutesa I himself was both the Kabaka and the leader of Islam (chief khadhi or mufti). He used to lead all prayers performed in his presence and he ordered all animals for human consumption to be prepared (slaughtered) as per Islamic teachings. Mutesa’s status as Imaam matched with the traditional status of the Kabaka whereby no one in the kingdom could be contemplated to be superior to the Kabaka.

Conflict and Factions

In 1876 a group of Muslims entered B/Uganda from the Sudan. Their approach in spreading Islam was different from that used by the first group. They criticized the first group for having accepted the Kabaka to lead prayers when he was not circumcised. They considered it unIslamic for any uncircumcised person to lead prayers or slaughter animals for human consumption. As the Muslims refused to be led in prayer by the uncircumcised Kabaka, which act was regarded as a rebellion, the consequence was the execution of 140 Muslims on the orders of the King.

This rebellion made Mutesa I skeptical of Muslims and the Arabs who had introduced the faith. It was around this time that Mutesa I got contacts with the Europeans and wrote a letter to the Queen of England, requesting her majesty to send people to teach his people how to read and write. The outcome of Mutesa’s letter was the coming of the first Anglican Church Missionaries in 1877, followed by the Catholic White Fathers in 1879. The arrival of these Missionaries marked the beginning of a formal system of education and organized missionary work in Uganda as seen today.

The missionaries came with strong weapons which Mutesa thought were vital for the expansion of the kingdom and the consolidation of his authority which the Muslims had attempted to challenge. As a consequence, he made the Christian missionaries his close allies, eventually replacing Islam with Christianity as the state religion. The efforts by the Muslims to regain their good relationship with the King met stiff resistance from the Christians who were now increasing in numbers and eventually the Muslims were expelled form the palace. Although Mutesa did not denounce Islam by the time of his death in 1881, there was no longer any close relationship between him and the rest of the Muslim community apart from his step brother prince Nuhu Mbogo.

The cost of the conflict to the Muslims in B/uganda

140 Muslims executed.

Islam lost the status of a state religion which it had attained.
Muslims were expelled from the palace and influence to the Kabaka was lost.

Mutesa I was succeeded by his son Mwanga II who, after accepting the influence of Christianity in the kingdom for some times, fell out with the Missionaries and executed their followers. He was removed from the throne and the Muslims were quick enough to enthrone his brother Mutebi-Kiwewa, whom they thought would be a better ally. This was at a time when Muslims still had the upper hand and still controlled almost all big positions in the palace. Mutebi’s performance did not measure with the challenging situation of the competition between the Muslims, on the one hand, and the Christians on the other. He was consequently replaced by his brother Kalema who was courageous enough to become the first King who accepted to be circumcised.

Kabaka Rashid Kalema as the leader of Islam.

After the Muslims had installed Kalema, Islam was brought back into the mainstream and a Muslim katikiro Abdul Kadir Kyambadde was appointed to make Islam appear a state religion once again. This turn of events hurt the Christians of the two denominations to the extent that the Catholics, the Protestants and the traditionists united and fought the Muslims. The result of the war that followed was the expulsion of Muslims from the palace and the prominent ones exiled from Buganda. Prince Nuhu Mbogo ran to Bunyoro with a number of Muslims who elected him as the “King” for the Muslims in exile. Other Muslims scattered to different parts of Uganda, a process that facilitated the spread of Islam to the rest of Uganda.

Prince Mbogo as the leader of Islam.

In 1890, the Imperial British East African Company (I.B.E.A.CO.) was formed, and B/Uganda was declared a British protectorate. Captain Lugard, who was sent as the representative of I.B.E.A.CO., came with the intention of promoting Christianity in this part of the world. He thought that, as “King” of the Muslims in exile, Prince Mbogo would be a threat to the colonial leadership. Lugard therefore persuaded Mbogo and Kalema’s surviving son to surrender. When Mbogo surrendered, he was detained, an act that annoyed the rest of the Muslims. After then, the Muslims were highly segregated to the extent that no single Muslim was appointed to any principle office.

In the effort to regain power and political influence, the Muslims reorganized and planned to stage a coup using troops from Sudan and Egypt. When the British authority realized that Mbogo’s influence was intolerable, even when under detention, they decided to exile him to Seychelles Islands.

By 1900, much as the Muslims were being marginalized, their presence and influence in the National affairs could not be completely ignored. In the 1900 B/Uganda agreement, out of the twenty counties that made up Buganda, Muslims were allocated only one county of Butambala and Prince Nuhu Mbogo was released and recognized as the leader of Muslims but not a Kabaka. He was given a pension of 250 pounds while 24 sq. miles were allocated to him on behalf of the Muslim community. When Mbogo died in 1921, prince Kakungulu, his son, succeeded him as the leader of Muslims in B/Uganda.

Prince Kakungulu as the leader of Islam

After the death of Mbogo, Muslims had already known the importance of being in leadership, especially in regard to the Muslim Community, the Kingdom of Buganda and the country Uganda which was still in the making. Some politically minded people thought that they would use the demise of the Prince to separate Muslim leadership from the royal family. Around 1923 a dispute erupted between Taibu Magatto and Kakungulu’s supporters over the issue of leadership in the Muslim Community.

Taibu Magatto was the county chief of Butambala, the only county given to the Muslim Community by the Imperial Government. He argued that Kakungulu did not have any qualifications in religious studies and therefore was not fit to be the head of the faith. He was supported by a prominent Muslim Sheikh Sekimwanyi. Kakungulu went all the way to getting instructors from Zanzibar to teach him the religion but these efforts were not enough to win him support from his opponents. Instead, they developed another distinguishing factor based on doctrinal differences. It was on the basis of these doctrinal differences that all the emerging groups founded their organizations.

A close examination of the trend of Muslim leadership wrangles in B/Uganda indicates that even when the issues professed by the complainants are addressed, the leaders of the factions invent other sources of differences, however minor they may be, to justify their continued separate leadership. On the other hand if the leader of a faction eventually manages to join what is considered the mainstream organ, he ends up doing exactly what he had been criticizing of his predecessors.

The following examination of the factions and conflicts will only indicate the professed points of differences but the hypothesis is that the non professed motive is the leadership issue whereby individuals manipulate fellow Muslims to assess leadership positions.

JUMA-ZUKUULI

When Islam was first introduced to B/Uganda, the teaching was that Juma prayers replace the Zuhur (zukuuli) Prayers on Fridays. However, as people read literature from different sources, there came up a view that both Juma and Zuhur were Faradha (compulsory) prayers and that none of the two could replace the other. This view created antagonism within the Muslim community, to the extent that the matter was referred to the Tanzanian Muslim leaders, as they were regarded as superior in Islamic knowledge. The judgment given did not satisfy the conflicting groups and the matter was then referred to Mecca.

The results of the Mecca appeal recommended that the two groups should coexist. The juma-zukuuli would perform Juma and add Zuhur, while those who believed otherwise would do with Juma alone. The leader of Juma-Zukuuli was Abdullah Mivule whose headquarters were at Kawempe. The rest who subscribed to this belief remained sharing the same mosques with other Muslims, but would organize themselves and perform Zuhur after Juma Prayers.

JUMA NKADDE

Another dispute arose when one group of Muslims rejected emphasis on Hadith and playing Mataali on Muslim functions. The split was between Juma Nkadde and Juma Mpya. Juma Nkadde disagreed with those who put great emphasis on the importance of hadith. They also rejected mataali which they regarded unislamic. On the other hand Juma Mpya encouraged the translation of khutuba into local languages during Juma Prayers. They also allowed their follower to use the Calendar to decide the beginning of the month of Ramathan as well as Idd day. They would perform adhan in the grave before powering soil into the grave during burial. Juma Nkadde had their headquarters at Bukoto Nateete and the prominent Sheiks in this sect were Sekimwanyi, Abdul Kadir Mbogo, Mukongo, and Mugenyi Asooka. Under Mugenyi Asooka’s leadership, this sect became known as ‘the African Muslim Community Juma sect.

JUMA MPYA

This sect became known as Kibuli Jamiatil Islamia with its headquarters at Kibuli. Its difference from Juma Nkadde was the acceptance of the use of Mataali on Islamic functions, the application of hadith in the interpretation of the Qur’an and as guidance on other Islamic Issues, and waiting for the sighting of the moon to start fasting during the month of Ramadhan and celebrating Idd. The leader of this sect was Prince Badru Kakungulu with Sheik Muhamad Ssemakula as one of the prominent sheikhs. This group was the closest to the political leadership because of the royal family connection.

KIKABYA QUR’AN SOCIETY.

The Kikabya Qur’an Society was under the leadership of one Kalijaata although it did not gain prominence. Its main teaching was that during Friday khutuba, nothing was supposed to be said other than reciting the holy Qur’an. It considered sunna and hadith unnecessary. It became unpopular because it taught that bathing the whole body (ghusul) after ceremonial intercourse was not obligatory.

UGANDA MUSLIM COMMUNITY.

When Uganda gained her independence in 1962, Mutesa II, the Kabaka of Buganda doubled as the first president of the whole of Uganda. The fact that Juma mpya was led by prince Kakungulu, a member of the royal family, made the sect more powerful than the rest of the sects that had existed up to that time. Juma mpya (kibuli jamiatil Islamia) now became known as Uganda Muslim Community implying that it was to cater for all the Muslims in Uganda. It is important to note that up to that time, all prominent persons in Muslim leadership positions in the various factions were Baganda.

When Obote fell out with Muteesa and subsequently abolished all Kingdoms in Uganda, he badly needed to divert the loyalty of the Muslim Community from Buganda to the ruling party. He therefore devised a plan of using the educated non Baganda Muslims to form an association which would match with the ruling system. This is how NAAMU came into existence.

THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MUSLIMS OF UGANDA (NAAMU).

The main professed motive of this association was to provide Muslims with leadership based on knowledge of Islam rather than inheritance as it seemed to be with the Uganda Muslim Community. This idea sounded attractive to the sheikhs who were not close to the royal family of Buganda and to the educated Muslims who were in the ruling UPC party. The prominent sheikhs included Swaibu Ssemakula, Obedi Kamulegeya and Abu Bakar Matovu. The educated UPC group included Adoko Nichon, a cousin to president Obote, Abasi Balinda, Ishak Magezi, Mustafa Kupa and many others from different parts of Uganda.

NAAMU became the Muslim wing of UPC and by 1968, President Obote had appointed many of the NAAMU members as sub-county and county chiefs. UMC, on the other hand, remained attached to the royal family and the support of the elderly and the un-educated Muslims. The political rivalry between Buganda and the rest of Uganda was directly transferred into Islam as UMC vs NAAMU, and since UMC was older than NAAMU, all mosques in Uganda were assumed by the majority of Muslims to belong to UMC, an idea that was unacceptable to NAAMU members. The consequence of this controversy was a tour of the country by NAAMU leaders in a bid to register more support for their faction.

UMC members staged resistance in some places but NAAMU had the government support that created a power imbalance. The consequences of these struggles were the shootings at Kemishego, Kajara in 1968, during which Idd Kawaganya (father to Imam Kasozi) and Dauda Moshi (son of Mutasa) were killed. Present at the scene of the incident doubling as a government official and NAAMU member was Abasi Balinda and it was Rwakanengere, the commander of police (a non-Muslim) who ordered the shooting.

LOSSES INCURRED BY THE MUSLIMS DUE TO DISUNITY

Loss of lives such as those lost in Kajara.
Muslims missed the opportunity to bargain for more land and to get land titles during the colonial times.


THE UGANDA MUSLIM SUPREME COUNCIL (UMSC)

1. Sheikh Abdul Razak Matovu as Chief Kadhi.

When Idd Amin took over power in 1971, as a Muslim, he was aware of the need for streamlining leadership in the Muslim Community. He started by consulting Muslim opinion leaders on what should be done to empower a community that had been left behind in almost all aspects of life. Whether he wanted to use the community as a political base, the outcome was a community under one leadership called the Uganda Muslim Supreme Council.

In a meeting held in Kabale Town in 1972, UMSC was formed as an umbrella organization for all Muslims in Uganda. Unlike the various Muslim groups that had existed hitherto, UMSC made a written constitution and was registered as a company. This constitution exists but unfortunately very few Muslims have bothered to read and internalize it. The highest office in the leadership structure as per the constitution was the office of the chief kadhi. At the same meeting, Sheikh Abdul Razak Matovu was elected chief kadhi while Sheikh Ali Kulumba was made the deputy. Other office bearers were also elected, putting into consideration regional representation, as earlier instructed by the President.

2. Sheikh Sulaiman Matovu as Chief Kadhi.

In 1973, Abdul Razak Matovu fell out with Idd Amin and Sheik Sulaiman Matovu was chosen to replace him. It is, however, not clear whether Amin followed the constitution in effecting this appointment, but since he was the founder of UMSC, a Muslim and a military leader, no one could dare query the appointment.

Sulaiman Matovu (commonly known as Sheik Mukulu) remained chief kadhi until 1978 when he resigned. This is the time when Amin was engaged in a stiff battle with UNLFA supported by the Tanzanian army and he had no time to attend to other issues until he was overthrown on 11th April 1979. Haji Mufanjala, who was the Chairman of the UMSC under Sulaiman Matovu’s leadership, headed the council until the fall of Amin’s government.

BENEFITS OF UNITY TO THE MUSLIMS BEFORE THE FALL OF AMIN.

1. The formation of UMSC provided an umbrella organization with a national character.
2. Idd Amin enabled Muslims to acquire property which included buildings, land, and factories.
3. Muslims acquired their first unifying headquarters at Old Kampala, independent of Kibuli which had a historical attachment to the royal family of Buganda.
4. Uganda became a registered member of the Organization of Islamic Conference, the result of which is the I.U.I.U.
5. Idd day was celebrated on the same day throughout Uganda as opposed to the past when each faction could celebrate it on a different day.
6. Through UMSC, scholarships could be secured for Muslim students throughout the country and many of the Muslim professionals in Uganda today were beneficiaries of the scheme.
7. Islam and the Muslims at large begun to be revered which resulted in many conversions to Islam.

3. Sheikh Kassim Mulumba as Chief Kadhi.

When the UNLF took over power, the leaders wanted to reconcile with the Muslims for the atrocities done during the war. They needed a leader through whom they would reach the whole community. The UNLA leadership approached Prince Badru Kakungulu as a Muslim opinion leader for consultation about the Muslim leadership. Prince Kakungulu forwarded the name of Sheik Kassim Mulumba as a suitable candidate to be acting chief kadhi in the interim until the Muslims would be able to elect their leaders.

During the war that overthrew Amin, many innocent Muslims had been massacred at Kiziba in Bushenyi, but because of having no central leadership the incident had remained unknown to the world. Immediately Mulumba took office, he organized a Mauled in Mbarara during which he made public all the massacres before government representatives. He asserted that Muslims had not been liberated and challenged government to take action. Without such central leadership, it was impossible for the Muslims to forward their grievances.

4. Two Chief Kadhi- Mulumba and Kamulegeya; and Mufti Matovu.

In 1980 Prince Kakungulu called upon Mulumba and advised him to organize general elections since his coming to office was not through the constitutional procedures and was only meant to serve for an interim period. When Mulumba turned down the advice, Kakungulu organized a meeting at Makerere University where another team of leaders was appointed, with a new headquarters at Kibuli. A position of Mufti was created and the Muslim leadership crisis went back to the days before Amin came to power.

The office bearers elected at Makerere were: Abdul Razak Matovu as Mufti, Obed Kamulegeya as chief kadhi and Badru Kakungulu as chairman. It is not clear whether these leaders were elected constitutionally, but they claimed to be the rightful office bearers as opposed to Mulumba’s group. This was another beginning of having two sets of leaders, claiming to be heading the same organization at the same time.

The confusion that followed led the matter to be referred to the Muslim World League (MWL) in 1982. In a meeting chaired by Qasamallah, the two groups agreed to merge into one with the following positions: Abdul Razak Matovu as Mufti, Kassim Mulumba as chief kadhi, Obed Kamulegeya as deputy chief kadhi, Badru Kakungulu as chairman and Isa Lukwago as Secretary General.

On realizing that the new team was dominated by his opponents who had been elected at Makerere, Mulumba submitted his resignation letter to the Mufti on medical grounds. When he got a second thought to withdraw his resignation, it was too late as his position had already been taken up by Kamulegeya. Mulumba declared himself again as the chief kadhi of UMSC and put his headquarters at Masjid Noor, William Street. Kamulegeya, being a close associate of Obote because of the UPC/ NAAMU connection, forced Mulumba out of Masjid Noor and the later shifted his headquarters to Lubaga Road Mosque.

The period that followed gave Obote and his henchmen the opportunity to apply his method of divide and rule. While Obote and some of his strong men recognized Kamulegeya and his group as the official leaders of the UMSC, his vice President Paul Muwanga and others sided with Mulumba and his group and provided them with all the necessary support as the official leaders of the UMSC. The government officials who were prominent in this fracas were Chris Rwakasisi, Minister of state in the office of the President, Luwuliza Kirunda, Minister of Internal affairs, Ambassador Ali Ssenyonga, and Tito Okello the Army Chief.

5. Sheikh Hussein Rajab Kakooza as Chief Kadhi.

When Bazilio Okello and Tito Okello turned against Obote in a military coup, Mulumba also staged a coup and chased away Kamulegeya and his group from old Kampala headquarters. This turn of events was made possible by the personal relationships of the people involved. Muwanga and Mulumba were old friends from the 60s when Muwanga was Uganda’s Ambassador in Cairo while Mulumba was a student there. On the other hand Kamulegeya was a close ally of the Obote government because of his link with the UPC party.

Kamulegeya appealed to the Muslim World League for help and in a meeting chaired by Dr. Umar Nassif, the secretary general MWL, it was agreed that both Kamulegeya and Mulumba should step aside for new leadership. This was the Mecca agreement which proposed the election of an interim leadership of UMSC composed of people who had not been involved in previous conflicts. The new interim leaders were Sheikh Hussein Rajab Kakooza as chief kadhi, Sheikh Ibrahim Saad Luwemba as deputy chief kadhi and Ntege Lubwama as Secretary General. Ntege Lumwama failed to take up the office and it was taken over by Yusuf Isa Byekwaso.

6. Two Mufti – Kakooza and Luwemba.

Sheikh Hussein Rajab Kakooza organized the national elections for the community leadership as per the Mecca agreement where both the incumbent Chief Kadhi and his Deputy were among the contestants. The final results had Sheikh Ibrahim Saad Luwemba as Mufti and Ali Senyonga as Chairman. This turn of events was unexpected to some Muslims who thought that the Muslim leadership still had to be attached to the Buganda royal family.

Prominent Muslims in support of the Kakungulu group and led by Haji Abubakar Mayanja proposed that the elections should be nullified, claiming that they contained irregularities and that Luwemba had no qualifications for the position of Mufti. Kakooza and his group refused to hand over office to Luwemba and the matter ended up in the courts of law as Luwemba put up his headquarters at Lubaga Road to go ahead with business as usual.

Eventually Court made its judgment in favor of Luwemba, basing on the argument that the UMSC constitution allowed one to become a Mufti if he had an equivalent of a degree in Islamic Law. Luwemba was in possession of a certificate from Libya which Court considered the equivalent of a degree in Islamic Law. Consequently, Luwemba took over the headquarter office at old Kampala. Kakooza’s group considered the judgment unfair and moved their headquarters to Kibuli where they kept claiming to be the rightful leaders of the community. It is important to note that during Luwemba’s tenure of office, some property that had been left by the Indians under the custody of UMSC was returned to the Indians following the guidance of the central Government. This move did not auger well to some Muslims to the extent that it widened the rift between existing factions. It was this time that some Muslims started to query the whereabouts of the money for the completion of the headquarter mosque which had been pledged by the Iranian President when he visited Uganda. Whether the pledge was fulfilled or not still remains a question.

7. Two Mufti- Luwemba and Mukasa.

The Muslim Unity and Reconciliation Conference that was held in Kampala on 10th May 1993 under the stewardship of Professor George Kanyeihamba, was an attempt by the Uganda Government to intervene in the Muslim dispute. Funding was acquired from the Muslim World League, represented in Uganda by Dr. Mohamed Ahmad Kisuule, who was a sympathizer of the Kakooza group at Kibuli.

Sheikh Luwemba was skeptical of Kisuule’s neutrality and, as a consequence, he refused to participate in the follow-up meeting in Mbarara that saw Sheikh Ahmad Mukasa elected as another Mufti. The event ended Kakooza’s claim to the office and started off another rivalry between Luwemba and Mukasa that culminated into an embarrassing episode when the two Muslim leaders were separately invited to officiate on a public function and had to fight over the microphone! The rivalry went on even after the death of Sheikh Luwemba, who was succeeded by Sheikh Muhamad Semakula.

8. Sheikh Shaban Ramadhan Mubajje as Mufti

The situation of double leadership in the UMSC continued until 2001 when the Mukasa and Semakula groups agreed to hold elections which would usher in a unifying and seemingly neutral leadership. Thanks to the efforts of Eng. Muhammad Sewajjwa Kyeyune who mobilized the two groups using mediation techniques and eventually convinced Haji Ishak Magezi to play his role of the chairman electoral commission for UMSC. The elections that were held in 2001 brought Sheikh Shaban Ramathan Mubajje’s administration into office and for about 7 years, the Uganda Muslims witnessed a relatively peaceful period similar to that experienced in Amin’s time of 1972-1978.

BENEFITS TO THE MUSLIMS DURING THE SPELL OF UNITY

1. With the help of Major General Moses Ali, the then 3rd Deputy Prime minister and Minister of Trade and Tourism, combined with Eng. Muhamed Sewajjwa Kyeyune’s mediation skills, UMSC was able to secure a land title for its old Kampala headquarters.
2. The construction of the National Mosque, with the help of the Libyan President Col. Muamar Kadhafi, was completed and it is now a point of reference and a source of pride to the Muslims of Uganda.
3. The open war between the Tablig and the other Muslims subsided and both groups accepted to live side by side.

9. Mufti and Supreme Mufti- Mubajje and Kayongo

Discontent about Sheikh Mubajje started in 2006 when some delegates to the UMSC complained about the sale of Muslim property without the consent of the Council. The matter ended up dividing Council members into two groups and others like Sheikh Mahd Kakooza being expelled. As tension mounted further, the Chairman of the Council was forced to resign, allowing his Vice Chairman Hassan Basajjabalaba to take his position. The implicated persons in the sale of UMSC property included the Mufti, Sheik Mubajje, the Secretary General Dr. Edris Kasenene, and now the Chairman Haji Hassan Basajjabalaba

In a move to find a solution for the rising discontent, a commission of inquiry was set up to investigate the matter. Dr. Muhammad Mpezamihigo was elected chairman to the commission whose offices were housed at Hotel Africana and funded by Haji Basajabalaba.

As the inquiries progressed, Sheikh Nuhu Muzaata Batte, ‘the Imam of Imams’, as he had been nicknamed, produced a recorded tape on which he had declared Mubajje a thief, an act that became a catalysis to the conflict and made the situation worse. Kasenene and Basajabalaba, were among the people who went to the commission but Sheikh Mubajje refused to go to Hotel African sighting insecurity as the major obstacle.

Sheikh Mubajje further argued that the Commission had been turned into Court instead of gathering information about the sale of the properties. He said that he was dismayed by being proclaimed a thief by his subordinates and putting the matter to the press before hearing from him. He wondered why he was not being accused of putting up structures at UMSC headquarters and mocked Muzaata who referred to the structures as toilets. The members of the Commission, on the other hand, insisted that they could not go to the Mufti’s office for the information they needed so badly, sighting their rules of procedure which they had laid down at the beginning. The Commission, therefore, went ahead and concluded its inquiries without hearing from Sheikh Mubajje, as if the rules had been cast in stone to risk the outcome of the whole exercise. After spending a lot of time and money, they went ahead and made their report with observations and recommendations.

Sheikh Haruna Jjemba, one of the delegates to the UMSC General Assembly and a lecturer at Makerere University, Hassan Kirya, another delegate, and Sheikh Abdul Hakim Sekimpi, a leader of a Tablig faction and popularly known as Amir Daula, took the matter to court. The accused were Sheikh Mubajje, the Mufti, Dr. Edris Kasenene, the Secretary General, and Haji Hassan Basajabalaba, the Chairman, accusing them of selling Muslim property without authority. It is not clear whether this action was one of the recommendations of the commission.

At court, the case went through two stages, the first one determining the second. The first stage was to determine whether the accused three had any case to answer. The judgment was that the three had a case to answer, and this verdict pleased the complainants. The second stage was to find out whether the accused three sold UMSC property, and that if they did, to find out whether they had a right to do so.

As a matter of procedure, Mubajje denied having sold Muslim property personally but as the hearing went on it was proved that Mubajje as the Mufti had sold the property which was permissible according to the UMSC Constitution. In the final ruling, it was pronounced that Mubajje had lied to court by denying having sold Muslim property but he had not violated any constitutional provisions by selling the property as the Mufti.

The final verdict which exonerated Mubajje and others led to further discontent among the majority of Muslims and in the subsequent meeting at Hotel Africana, a group of Sheikhs disassociated themselves with Mubajje as their Mufti. It was after this meeting that the dissidents met again and elected Sheikh Zubair Sowed Kayongo as Supreme Mufti of Uganda and Sheik Abdul Hakim Sekimpi, up to then Amir Umma, as the deputy Supreme Mufti.

Some district kadhis and Imams declared their support to Kayongo, in most cases ending up being sacked by Mubajje’s administration. Sheikh Mubajje went further to sue Kayongo for claiming to be the Mufti of Uganda and using Mosques that belong to UMSC. On the other hand, Kayongo intensified his visits to various mosques to register support with the intention of finally uprooting Mubajje and his administration from UMSC.

10. THE TABLIG

MUFTI ZIWA AND CHIEF KADHI LUTAAYA.

Tablig started as a group of young Muslims aiming at spreading Islam through voluntary service in the early 1980’s. The group later came to be known as SPIDIQA which was an abbreviation for ‘Society for the propagation of Islam and distraction of Qadianism’. It was started by Sheikhs who included Umar Mazinga and Kizito Ziwa who had acquired some influence from Pakistan. Their preaching appeared to be very revolutionary and appealed mostly to the Muslim youth who were in and around Kampala at that time. When the gospel reached Nakasero Mosque, the hitherto society turned into a new faction independent of the then existing factions. They elected their leaders with Sheikh Edris Lutaaya as the Mufti and Sheikh Kizito Ziwa as the Chief Kadhi. Sheikh Zubair Bakar was another prominent Sheikh in the administration of the Tablig sect.

As time went by, Ziwa started applying a more radical approach in his preaching which caused discomfort among the group. At this time Lutaaya decided to pull out of the sect quietly and soon after, Ziwa was also expelled from the group. It was alleged that Ziwa had started challenging the views of respected and well-known Imams like Imam Shafii and Abu Hanifa. There were also other allegations like the use of alcohol and disregarding other fundamental principles of Islam in a manner that was unacceptable to the community.

MUHAMAD KAMOGA

After his expulsion from Nakasero Mosque, Sheikh Kizito Ziwa formed another group and put his headquarters in the neighborhood of Nakasero Mosque. Ziwa went on preaching and periodically producing written sermons which aimed at showing his superiority over the rest of the Sheikhs in the country. He was later forced out of the building near Nakasero Mosque, as his support could not match that of Zubair Bakar, who had more influence in the government of the day. Ziwa moved his group to Kisenyi, where they have lived in a low profile to the present day.

The main Tablig group that remained at Nakasero Mosque was under the leadership of Sheikh Muhamad Kamoga. The group eventually became more intolerant to the UMSC leadership as they blamed them of being hypocrites who knew the truth but preached the contrary. The UMSC style of preaching followed the strict categorization of acts into Faradha/ Wajib (compulsory), Sunna (optional but necessary), Karaha (undesirable), Harram (forbidden), Mubaha/Batil (neutral) and Urf (culture). On the contrary, the Tablig put a lot of emphasis on sunna to the extent of turning some sunna acts into Faradha. The hadith about Bidi’a (innovation) was exaggerated to the extent that all Batil/Mubaha and Urf acts looked Harram to the followers. As a result issues such as Mauled, Shaving of the Beard, Shortening trousers, pronouncing Tasmia aloud before Surat Al Fatiha and utterance of Niyat (intention) before the acts became major issues of contention. In the words of Sheikh Abdallah Kalanzi, who used to preach on Radio Uganda, Tablig was meant for both Daawa and Erishaad which meant preaching addressed to non Muslims for conversion, and preaching to the Muslims to correct what was perceived to be wrong respectively.

In order to bridge the widening gap between UMSC and the Tablig, Sheikh Kakooza’s administration decided to utilize some sheikhs from the Tablig sect. Under this arrangement Sheikh Abdallah Kalanzi was appointed district kadhi for Kabale and Kisoro, and probably Sheikh Mubajje also became the district kadhi of Mbale under the same arrangement.

This approach did not stop the remaining Tablig under Kamoga from using a radical approach. On one occasion Kamonga led his group to take over Old Kampala headquarters in a coup and managed to seize the mosque for some days. They, however, failed to get willing Sheikhs to take over the leadership of UMSC. Sheikh Uthman Alonga, then a lecturer at Makerere University, was approached and he turned down the offer. The coup failed after some days, with minimum casualties.

The second attempt was led by Jamiru Mukulu in the early 1990’s. Mukulu is a product of Tablig preaching efforts during the time of Sheikh Lutaaya as Mufti. After joining Islam, Jamiru Mukulu was facilitated to learn Arabic and Islamic Studies and within a spell of five years he was being addressed as ‘Sheikh Jamiru Mukulu’. Using this popularity, Mukulu led a group of Tabligs to take over the old Kampala UMSC headquarters. When the government tried to intervene using the Police, the Tablig youths killed a policeman and two police dogs, and many of the Tablig youths were arrested including Mukulu himself. Meanwhile Muhammad Kamoga exiled himself to Kenya.

AMIR DAULA, SULAIMAN KAKEETO

After the above incidents, Sulaman Kakeeto was elected leader of the Nakasero based Tablig. He came with a more liberal approach than his immediate predecessors and he concentrated more on Daawa and Erishaad rather than the antagonism that had been the focus of Ziwa, Kamoga and Mukulu. Kakeeto still continues to be the leader of the Tablig with the headquarters at Nakasero Mosque. His title is Amir Daula and he has regional and district Amirs under his administration throughout Uganda.

JAMIRU MUKULU AND THE SALAF FACTION

Meanwhile Jamiru Mukulu utilized the time in prison to indoctrinate the semi-illiterate Muslim youths in prison with his radical and militant views. When Mukulu and his group came out of prison, they refused to be led in prayers by those who had not been to prison because they considered them to be with less Iman (faith) basing on some Hadith. They also refused to eat meat of animals slaughtered by anybody who did not belong to their group. They formed a faction of the Tablig called Salaf and started regarding other Muslims as non believers. They could neither give Salam nor answer it to the rest of the Muslims. Jamiru Mukulu visited some Mosques in some parts of Uganda and wherever he registered majority support, the minorities were chased out of that Mosque. Itendero Mosque in Bushenyi and Kyazanga Kitooro Mosque in Masaka are some of the examples that went through that experience for some time.

Finally, Jamiru Mukulu mobilized some Muslim, semi-illiterate youths among his followers and formed a rebel group against the government of Uganda. Whether the youths were convinced that it was incumbent on them to fight any government headed by a non Muslim, or they were deceived that they were being organized to be taken abroad to get good employment, the outcome of Mukulu’s mission was a disaster. Many Muslim youths, mainly from Itendero and Kyazanga are believed to have died in that insurgency.

Another group of Muslim youth was intercepted by the government forces at Buseruka as they were still waiting to be dispatched. These were taken to Luzira but Jamiru Mukulu escaped. Since then Mukulu’s where about is unknown. There is a school of thought that Mukulu had converted to Islam with a hidden agenda of collecting and selling Muslim youths to rebel groups for his livelihood.

AMIR UMMA, ABDUL HAKIM SEKIMPI

Disagreement in the approach led to the development of another faction within the Tablig sect. This splitter group has been led by Amir Umma Sekimpi till he recently became deputy Supreme Mufti.


SOME POINTS WORTHY NOTING

1. The concerns exhibited by the Muslims over issues that relate to governance and their property as a community should be taken seriously.
2. The current situation in the Muslim Community, however, should not create too much excitement as similar situations have happened before among the Muslims of B/Uganda as already shown in this paper.
3. Extra care should be taken when seeking solutions for the current problem to avoid being entangled in more complicated situations like before.
4. It is important to remember that fighting over mosques may result into deaths like those at Kemishego in 1968.
5. The recent government cabinet reshuffle in which Hon Haji Ali Kirunda Kivejinja became Minister for Internal affairs and Hon. Haji Abu baker Jeje Odong became Minister for Security may have a bearing on the prevailing disputes within the Muslim community.

6. The titles ‘Supreme Mufti of Uganda’ and ‘Mufti of Uganda’ are technically two different titles, just like having Amir Umma and Amir Daula co-existing, with none interfering with the other, although this is not to justify multiple sets of leadership.

7. The issue of Masjid Noor, among the sold properties, needs to be handled with great care. Calculated steps can be taken to reclaim the mosque like what was done in Kabale in 1992. A fund raising drive was made to collect money to pay off those who had wrongfully bought plots that belonged to the Muslims and by the end of the exercise the plots were claimed back. Similarly, funds can be raised to pay off Dick without a prolonged battle. As the saying goes, “first chase away the fox and then warn your chicken against roaming in the bushes”

8. Much as Col. Besigye’s attendance of the last funeral rites for the late Dr. Sulaiman Kigundu had some historic bearing, his pronouncements against the Mubajje Administration and the responses from Mubajje thereafter could have far reaching implications. The rivalry between Kibuli and Old Kampala should not be translated into FDC vs NRM politics, whereby Kayongo would be seen to represent Buganda and FDC, while Mubajje would symbolize NRM and the rest of Uganda. The three incidents when Kayongo’s vehicles were pelted in Arua on 30th April 2009, then burning of tents and the subsequent fighting at Nyamitanga when Kayongo was visiting Mbarara, and the breaking into the offices of the Masaka district kadhi are enough indicators that the Kemishego history of 1968 is already taking centre stage.

9. The Mubajje court case is not the first one in the history of Islam in B/Uganda. The first case was between Mugenyi Asooka and Nsambu in 1951 while the second one was between Kakooza and Luwemba. If court rulings have not addressed the leadership problem for the last three times, is it not time to employ an alternative method?

Instead of waiting for problems to emerge and start looking for solutions, can the Muslims put up a mechanism that can technically protect the leaders from falling victims of circumstances? Is the problem emanating from the UMSC Constitution whose review may be long overdue? Can there be another peace and reconciliation process with better results than the previous ones?

SOME QUESTIONS TO THE MUSLIMS FOR THOUGHT

Do Muslims in Uganda pay zakat to the UMSC?
Are the leaders in the UMSC including District kadhis, county Sheikhs and mosque Imams paid salaries?
Why is it that there are many Hijja Committees in Uganda today when there used to be only one in the past? What is the effect of this situation to the Muslim welfare in Uganda?
What is the effect of Muslim marriages being regulated by the different factions?
What is the effect of Muslim disunity in Uganda to the donor community?
Where does the UMSC administration get resources to run its business?

REFERENCES

Anderson J.N.D, (1954) Islamic Law in Africa.

Kasozi. A. B (1986) The spread of Islam in Uganda, Oxford University press.

Kanyeihamba George (1998) Reflection on the Muslim Leadership Question in Uganda, Fountain Publishers, Kampala, Uganda.

Mudoola Dan (1993) Religion, Ethnicity and Politics in Uganda, Fountain Publishers, Kampala, Uganda.

M/S Nsambu & Luganda Advocates, The Companies Act, The Memorandum and Articles (Constitution) of Uganda Muslim Supreme Council Memorandum. Kampala.

About Uganda Muslim Brothers & Sisters(UMBS) And How To Join The Forum

Standard

Uganda Muslim Brothers and Sisters(UMBS) Marhaban مرحبا

بِسمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحمٰنِ الرَّحيمِ ﴿١﴾ الحَمدُ لِلَّهِ رَبِّ العٰلَمينَ ﴿٢﴾ الرَّحمٰنِ الرَّحيمِ ﴿٣﴾ مٰلِكِ يَومِ الدّينِ ﴿٤﴾ إِيّاكَ نَعبُدُ وَإِيّاكَ نَستَعينُ ﴿٥﴾ اهدِنَا الصِّرٰطَ المُستَقيمَ ﴿٦﴾ صِرٰطَ الَّذينَ أَنعَمتَ عَلَيهِم غَيرِ المَغضوبِ عَلَيهِم وَلَا الضّالّينَUganda Muslim Brothers and Sisters “(UMBS),* is a free-to-join, non-profit making e-mail discussion forum that is devoted to matters of interest to all Muslims in Uganda

Forum

Dear brothers and sisters in Islam,UMBS welcomes all Muslims whatever country they reside in.

Let me take this opportunity to welcome all those that have joined the Uganda Muslim Brothers and Sisters (UMBS) forum . We are now over 6000 members of Uganda Muslims spread all over the world.Please encourage your family and freinds to join us for the good of Islam. We can be joined on google, Facebook and Twitter. We are also in the process of constructing an official website though we are being delayed by finances.

UMBS was started in 2010 mainly with the purpose of bringing all Uganda Muslims together. Below is a copy of the UMBS guidelines to help you find your way around the forum. Please feel free to contact us in case you need any further information.

What is Uganda Muslim Brothers & Sisters (UMBS) forum?

“Uganda Muslim Brothers and Sisters “(UMBS),* is a free-to-join, non-profit making e-mail discussion forum that is  intellectual and aligned religiously with the Islamic faith. UMBS is devoted to matters of interest to all Muslims in Uganda and Africa in general.Although it only concerns Muslims, it is interesting enough not only to remove some of the misconceptions one may have had about Muslims and Islam, but also prods one to go deeper to know more about them. UMBS therefore welcomes Muslims from other countries to join us.

UMBS is the only major Ugandan social network that enhances Muslim lifestyle instead of talking about purely religion or rambling politics. It has helped in uniting the widely dispersed and fragmented Uganda Muslim population to one virtual venue. UMBS forum gives power to the users to decide what content should be allowed or not, while they have all the power to ensure the content is accurate and closest to Muslim values. The users in UMBS also ensure that the forum has no place for sex, crime, or drug use-related content, neither is there a place for illegal content or content that spreads radicalization.

*Objectives of the ‘UMBS’ Forum

1. To promote better acquaintance, understanding, friendship,solidarity and cooperation among Muslims in Uganda and Africa.

2.To act as a link between Muslims abroad and Muslims in Uganda.

3. To provide Muslims with a platform to say things they want about their religious and political leaders.

Membership

1.  Anyone who is a Muslim can become a member. In this context, the term ‘Muslim’ shall mean anybody who believes in Islam.

2.Anyone who loves Muslims or who has got Islam at Heart can become a member. If you describe yourself as religiously tolerant and fiscally responsible, you’re a Muslim at heart.

Mission

The forum’s mission is to unite Muslims in Uganda and help them find solutions to their problems.

Discussions/Debates

Islamic discussions connect you with other Muslims around the world to share your questions, insights, and views about important issues in the country and the world at large. You get a chance to read what others are saying about hot topics, get knowledgeable answers, check out comparisons, and swap comments in our easy-to-use group discussions. Please share thoughts that you think will add to the discussion and help other Muslims interested in that topic.

Debating is about developing your communication skills. It is about assembling and organizing effective arguments, persuading and entertaining an audience. Debating is not about personal abuse, irrational attacks or purely emotional appeals.

Argument is the process of explaining why a point of view should be accepted. It concerns the logic and the evidence supporting a particular conclusion. Use evidence (i.e. examples, facts, statistics, quotations of expert/public opinion etc.) to back up each point you make in your argument. Show how each piece of evidence is relevant and how it advances your argument. Make a point, give the reason for that point, and supply evidence to back it up.

The aim of this document is to give you an idea of how to discuss or argue at UMBS forum without offending others. It’s not just a simple case of writing the first thing that comes into your head. There are certain rules and guidelines which have to be adhered to if you want to have any chance in a competitive discussion. This is not the document with all the answers. It is only a rough set of guidelines to help get you started. Everyone should try to find their own strengths and failings. In general most discussions should be conducted in English though we allow the use of one or two sentences in own local languages.

What shouldn’t I post?

Do not post:

Ø Profane or obscene, or spiteful comments

Ø Messages that abuse, denigrate or threaten others

Ø Any racist, sexist, discriminatory or otherwise harmful statements that are offensive

Ø Any personal information about children under 14 years old.

Ø Descriptions that intrude on the privacy of another person, including revealing personally identifiable information such as their name or address

Ø Text that promotes illegal or immoral conduct

Ø Repeated posts that make the same point excessively

Ø Repeated unwelcome messages that harass or embarrass other members or participants

Ø Any form of “spam,” including advertisements. Any body posting an advert will require the permission of the head moderator.

Ø Messages from other forums that break any of the rules of UMBS

# Messages that have got nothing to do with Islam or Muslims in Uganda. For example, politics should not be posted on the forum unless if its relevant to the Islamic causes in Uganda or internationally.

Defamatory content

There are now over 6000 members on this forum and therefore it is not possible for us to be aware of the contents of each member discussion. Accordingly, UMBS operates on a “notice and take down” basis. If you believe that any part of any member discussion is defamatory, please notify us immediately—send an email to abbeysemuwemba@gmail.com All members need to help the moderators through team work to make this forum a success.

Special note: Announcements

Announcements of local and national events etc are welcome but please send only the very basic details and include date, place, topic, type of event, and where to get more details

6. When replying to a message please use the same “subject” line so that people will find it easy to follow the “thread” of a topic.

▪If you are introducing a new topic choose a new subject line that makes the subject of your message clear to all.

▪Always choose a new subject line when your reply moves the topic away from what most people would expect from the existing subject line or when you have replied to the same subject line more than twice.

▪Use plain English – remember that people from 80 or more countries may be trying to make sense of your message. Some of them may not be completely fluent in English. Please refrain from using a language people don’t understand in your messages.

▪Be thoughtful and generous in your response to other people’s messages – try to consider what might be useful in what they are trying to say even if you disagree with it.

▪Never be rude or dismissive about someone’s messages – if you have any complaints about other people’s behaviour take it up with the forum manager rather than trying to deal with it yourself. Being rude or dismissive leads to “flaming”. Even if it doesn’t, it makes lots of forum participants very uncomfortable, not only the person you are being rude about!

▪Always sign your messages – please add your name at the end of your message, in the way you would normally introduce yourself, for example:

Best wishes, Abdullah Gayi

or simply

Abdullah Gayi

This helps to make the discussion friendly, since people can then say “I agree with Gayi that . . . ” or “Hello Gayi, thanks for your useful comment.My own view is that . . . “.This is particularly important if your name isn’t clear from your email address.

▪ If you have a particular reason for needing to remain anonymous, it is very fine and let members know.

▪ Please don’t make your signature block so long and please don’t add irrelevant material, especially advertising copy, clever formatting etc. All this does is increase the traffic level on the network and the forum server

- if you want to impress people with your understanding and know-how, the best way to is through the relevant content of your messages!

Please do not use the forum for:

♥Advertising – other than short, informative notices about programmes and events of interest to Ugandans

♥Questionnaires of any kind

♥Requests for help with private MBA, PhD or commercial research

♥Discussing the purpose and/or management of the forum, or the more general topic of how to run discussion forums. Experience has shown that such debate (discussion within a forum about its own purposes and organisation) is sterile and very off-putting for subscribers who joined to discuss the forum’s stated topics. The purpose of the forum is stated in its home page on the website; these rules set out the way it operates. The rules are enhanced from time to time and we welcome suggestions for changes to the rules or indeed the purposes of the forum.

Please help us maintain the overall quality and interest of the main topic discussions by avoiding “why are we here?” types of debate in the forum itself!

About “quoting” in replies to the forum

A common practice in this forum is “quoting” – you include part of the previous person’s message and then reply to it. This is helpful in providing context for your reply but it’s often overdone and can be irritating, for example:

You quote the whole of the last message; Then the next person quotes the whole of your new message including the whole of the earlier one that you quoted; The next person quotes all of both messages . You can easily see how this might escalate! In ordinary email, some people always quote the message they are replying to. This is a matter of taste but please don’t do it in the UMBS Forum. Here are some basic guidelines for “quoting”:

♣Only quote when it’s necessary – often the meaning and context of your message are clear without any quotes;

♣Don’t quote the whole message – it may be quicker and easier for you but remember several hundred people may be reading your message, if you want them to pay attention to you and your ideas, an extra few minutes to help them will be time well invested;

♣Never put the whole of the prior message at the beginning or end of your message; this is never necessary and just adds more traffic to the networks, more file space for anyone who wants to keep the messages for posterity, and no value whatever.

♣Quoting is more appropriate on a very busy forum but we are not yet there, where there may be several threads running and people have difficulty keeping track of the discussion, but even then please use it selectively.

How to join UMBS

Assalamu Alaikum,

Please join debates on UMBS forum at:

Google based forum:

https://groups.google.com/group/uganda-muslim-brothers-and-sisters?hl=en

Facebook:

http://www.facebook.com/groups/114514221938101

Twitter:

http://twitter.com/#!/UMBSFORUM

Blog:

You can visit our blog and subscribe to our monthly updates inishallaha

http://ugandamuslims.wordpress.com/

Website

We are the process of developing an official website for UMBS too though it has been delayed by finances. Visit our blog on the link above and click on ‘donate’ button to give us something inishallah- Whatever you can afford. For those in Kampala, please contact the forum Treasurer, Nageeba Hassan, to give her whatever you can afford inishallah.

Wassalamu

Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba

 ADMINISTRATOR

 

http://ugandansatheart.org/

http://twitter.com/#!/semuwemba

http://jjanguonkwekule.blogspot.com/

http://semuwemba.wordpress.com/

Muslim killings should be investigated.Muslims should read and write books about their history

Standard

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

It’s not true that Muslims don’t want to say anything about the killing of Muslims in Mbarara and elsewhere. Muslims are also searching for answers just like any other Ugandan. Muslims have been kind of disorganized for a while such that it has been difficult to bring them together to discuss matters of importance to their community, but we have started sorting this out slowly.

UMSC BOSS: Sheikh Mubajje

Muslims have been killed under different regimes but it is very difficult to gather all this information together to bring it into the public domain, but we are doing it. All Uganda’s leaders, apart from Iddil Amin, have been dividing and using Muslims to achieve their own political aims, but with more organization and unity, Muslims will eventually put a stop to this nosense.

For instance, there were some Muslims killed in Bushenyi district and president Museveni mentions this in his book (Sowing the Mustard Seed) on page 113. Museveni said that there were killed by fellow villagers who had been incited by someone whose identity was known. Museveni does not mention the name of the villager in his book though he gives this as one of the examples why Binaisa had to be dislodged from power.

Imaam Iddi Kasozi also presented a paper at the Uganda Muslim Youth Assembly (UMYA) in 2008- which talks about human rights and the murder of Muslims in Ankole and Arua. We saved the contents of this paper on the link below if you wanna read it:

http://ugandamuslims.wordpress.com/2011/06/27/human-right-in-uganda-the-fate-of-the-1979-muslim-massacres-in-arua-and-ankole-paper-presented-at-umya-ramadhan-seminar-2008/

I wish more Muslims present this data to us such that we keep it on records instead of dying with all this knowledge. The Torch Newspaper has also been conducting weekly interviews among the Muslim elders in Uganda to help us gather information here and there. I don’t know if they have stopped doing this as I have not seen any more interviews posted to us for a while, but I reckon they were doing a good job, and they should be supported.

It is unfortunate that few Muslims are writing books about events happening in the Muslim community in Uganda such that it is very difficult to come across such materials either in books or internet, a more reason we wish to have a detailed historical page about Muslims in Uganda on our soon to be built Muslim website inishallah.

Prince Badru Kakungulu (5th from left) and others at a UMEA function

People, like by George W. Kanyeihamba found it in themselves to write a book about Muslim leadership question in Uganda, but how  many Muslims have done so, apart from probably a few , like Abassi kiyimba. Kanyeihamba’s book is entitled:’’ Reflections on the Muslim leadership Question in Uganda’’, for those who may wish to read it later on.

Kanyeimba mentions something interesting that in both the 1993 Kampala Conference and the subsequent Mbarara General Assembly consultative meeting,’’ `a small minority of Muslims and their political allies in the NRM government obstinately blocked the progress towards unity and reconciliation ‘. He specifically points out that former mufti, late Sheikh Swaibu Luwemba, as an NRM doodle who had a lot of friends in NRM, among them the presidential advisor on Muslim affairs.

To be honest, I find it a bit selfish for a Muslim to start openly defending a government like NRM which thrives on dividing people of different tribes and religion- to its own benefit. They enjoy seeing Muslims more divided than united, and that is very sad. How much effort has president Museveni put in to unite different Muslim factions in Uganda at the moment? Some people have accused him of siding with Shiekh Mubajje group against others.

Anyway, there is also a good book I recommend people interested in this area to read called ‘’ Islam and the Confluence of Religions in Uganda, 184O-1966. By NOEL KING, ABDU KASOZI and ARYE ODED. Abdu Kasozi also wrote another one he called the ‘The Spread of Islam in Uganda’’.

But overall, Muslims should take advantage of this internet age to at least write historical articles about themselves instead of just talking about these things in only mosques and normal conversations.

 Abbey Kibirige Semuwemba

UK

Why are Muslims so backward and powerless?

Standard

Why are Muslims so backward and powerless?

Dr Farrukh Saleem

The writer is the Pakistani Executive Director of the Centre for  Research and Security Studies, a think tank established in 2007 and an Islamabad-based freelance columnist.

We Muslims must wonder why is that only Muslim States like Iraq,Afghanistan and Libya are being attacked by the Christian West.

Why do we get pushed around by them with the former President of the US George Bush calling it a crusade?

Why is that Muslim States often depend on the West for survival, even Saudi Arabia, the epicentre for Islamic fundamentalism (i.e. Wahabism) is dependent on American largesse for their survival?

While they preach Wahhabi Islam all over the world, they allow American bases within a few hundred kilometres from the Holiest Shrines of Islam.

There are an estimated 1,476,233,470 Muslims on the face of the planet: one billion in Asia, 400 million in Africa, 44 million in Europe and six million in the Americas.

Every fifth human being is a Muslim.

For every single Hindu there are two Muslims,  for every Buddhist there are two Muslims and  for every Jew there are one hundred Muslims.

Ever wondered why Muslims are so powerless?

Here is why: There are 57 member-countries of the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), and all of them put together have around 500 universities; one university for every three million Muslims.

The United States has 5,758 universities and India has 8,407.

In 2004, Shanghai Jiao Tong University compiled an ‘Academic Ranking of World Universities’ , and intriguingly, not one university from Muslim-majority states was in the top-500.

As per data collected by the UNDP, literacy in the Christian world stands at nearly 90 per cent and 15 Christian-majority states have a literacy rate of 100 per cent.

A Muslim-majority state, as a sharp contrast, has an average literacy rate of around 40 per cent and there is no Muslim-majority state with a literacy rate of 100 per cent.

Some 98 per cent of the ‘literates’ in the Christian world had completed primary school, while less than 50 per cent of the ‘literates’ in the Muslim world did the same.

Around 40 per cent of the ‘literates’ in the Christian world attended university while no more than two per cent of the ‘literates’ in the Muslim world did the same.

Muslim-majority countries have 230 scientists per one million Muslims.

The US has 4,000 scientists per million and

Japan has 5,000 per million.

In the entire Arab world, the total number of full-time researchers is 35,000 and there are only 50 technicians per one million Arabs. (in the Christian world there are up to 1,000 technicians per one million).

Furthermore, the Muslim world spends 0.2 per cent of its GDP on research and development, while the Christian world spends around five per cent of its GDP.

Conclusion: The Muslim world lacks the capacity to produce knowledge!

Daily newspapers per 1,000 people and number of book titles per million are two indicators of whether knowledge is being diffused in a society.

In Pakistan, there are 23 daily newspapers per 1,000 Pakistanis while the same ratio in Singapore is 360. In the UK, the number of book titles per million stands at 2,000 while the same in Egypt is 20.

Conclusion: The Muslim world is failing to diffuse knowledge.

Exports of high technology products as a percentage of total exports are an important indicator of knowledge application.

Pakistan’s export of high technology products as a percentage of total exports stands at one per cent.

The same for Saudi Arabia is 0.3 per cent;

Kuwait , Morocco , and Algeria are all at 0.3 per cent,

while Singapore is at 58 per cent.

Conclusion: The Muslim world is failing to apply knowledge.

Why are Muslims powerless?
…..Because we aren’t producing knowledge,
…..Because we aren’t diffusing knowledge.,
…..Because we aren’t applying knowledge.

And, the future belongs to knowledge-based societies.

Interestingly, the combined annual GDP of 57 OIC-countries is under $2 trillion.

America, just by herself, produces goods and services worth $12 trillion;

China $8 trillion,

Japan $3.8 trillion and

Germany $2.4 trillion (purchasing power parity basis).

Oil rich Saudi Arabia , UAE, Kuwait and Qatar collectively produce goods and services (mostly oil) worth $500 billion;

Spain alone produces goods and services worth over $1 trillion,

Catholic Poland $489 billion and

Buddhist Thailand $545 billion.

Muslim GDP as a percentage of world GDP is fast declining.

So, why are Muslims so powerless?

*Answer: Lack of education.

All we do is shout to Allah the whole day and blame everyone else for our multiple failures!

Reviewing the UMSc constitution is crucial to Muslim Unity in Uganda

Standard

MUSLIM UNITY:Reviewing UMSC constitution should also include revisiting the original UMSC constitution where we had Regional Qadhis.

Modern administration is based on devolution of powers. We should have Regional Qadhis and Regional Muslim Councils. Originally we had four Regional Qadhis; Buganda, Eastern, Western and Northern. l am with the view that we should have Buganda, Busoga, Eastern, North Eastern, Southern, Western, Northern and West Nile.

Secondly, we should not jump at forming Muslim districts whenever political districts are formed. l am not yet convertible with the division of districts in Masaka. Christians have nod divided theirs but for us, we do it even where we don’t have capacity.

There should be age limit for Qaghis be regional or distroict, and county, sub county sheikhs and mosque imams. The should be also parish imams.

Since Qadhis Courts are constitutional, Regional and District Qhadhis and their deputies, just like a Chief Qadhi and his deputy, should be appointed by Judicial Service Commission in consultation with Uganda Muslim Supreme Council. The chief Qadhi of Kenya is a High Court judge.

Then the mufti and his deputy should remain spiritual and Secretary General at the centre and Regional and District Secretaries should be in charge of administration.

The should be a strong East Africa Muslim Federation along East Africa Community/Common market, monitory union, political federation lines.

AHMED KATEREGA
NEWVISION

HASSAN KIRYA INTERVIEW WITH THE TORCH

Standard

kirya

HASSAN KIRYA is the official publicist of the Kibuli based interim leadership headed by Supreme Mufti sheikh Zubair Kayongo. Several scandals have been associated with him, HAMZA KYEYUNE moved to establish truth behind the alleged scandals.

 

Tell me about the days before you became a house hold name.

Yes, am Hassan Ibrahim Kirya, i was born on 2nd-june 1966 to Hajj Hassan Wasswa Ssesanga (RIP) and Hajjat Noor Nakaiza here in Nakawa. I Studied at Entebbe Qur’an School (Masanga) during Amin regime, thereafter, I went to Kireka UMEA, then to Bilal Islamic Bwaise, to Bilaal Kampala. From there, I went to Sudan where I completed my studies.

Word has been making rounds that when Sheikh Sulyman Kakeeto was ousted out of Nakasero, you encouraged faithfulls to fulfill the verse of booty and help themselves to the property that they found at the mosque. Ultimately, many people lost their property, for example, one Kalibbala Faisal lost property worth 10million shillings. How could you allow something like that to happen?

It is good that you have come to establish the truth that is fair of you, I hope the world will know the truth.  Nakasero mosque was closed by Kakeeto regime and they shifted prayers to Nalule acade, and it remained closed for some time, the veranda where the traders used to work from was fully packed with anti-riot police. The people that were trading from the veranda had removed their and kept it elsewhere that I do not know.

When we took over the mosque, I personally announced to the Muslims that had occupied the mosque that the property found in the mosque here should not be mistaken for booty, never! I told them the property belongs to other Muslims, therefore, do not tamper with it. I further announced that Whoever has come across anything with in the mosque, please hand it over to sheikh Muhamoud Abdallah  Kibaate Ssebugwaawo. Kibaate himself got a microphone and announced that whoever had taken anything, they should bring it back and hand it to him. Those items that were found in the mosque were handed over to sheikh Kibaate, those that had taken items with them brought them back.  We kept those items and who ever came claiming ownership to anything with proof was given back their property.  I had not heard anybody complaining that their stuff is missing, am hearing about it for the first time. So, am saying it again, who ever lost their property simply come to Nakasero and ask Sheikh Kibaate to give you your property. It is not true that we told anyone at Nakasero or anywhere to take anything from Nakasero as booty, it is nothing but lies.

In the words of one that I interviewed, he told me that in order for you to fulfill the verse of the booty, you personally took a microphone from the mosque. Is that another lie sir?

I went with a Microphone? (he is visibly furious)

Yes. That’s what I was told.

You see in this world there are people whose intention is to malign others but when you do that through lies, it makes no sense. Now, I Hassan Kirya take a microphone for what??(Loughs)……that who claims that I took a microphone, If he was present, he did not see properly, if he was told by another person, he was told lies, as simple as that. In a mosque where they were not praying from, had they left there only the microphone that I took? You can see it is blatant lies. When they were going to Nalule arcade, they took everything including the carpets, they should stop lying.

In a letter secured from the Munazzamat country director Abdul-Azeem  Outhman expelled you from Munazzamat for failure to account for funds. How did you fail to account for the funds? Unless you did not honestly spend it

Before I answer your question, it will be helpful for you to first understand Munazzamat and its nature of operation. Munazzamat al-Da’wa al-Islamiyya is an international non-governmental religious organization operating in several countries including Uganda with its headquarters in Khartoum , capital of Sudan, founded in May 1980 .The Munazzamat aims at spreading Islam courteously and gently and at providing social services to the deprived people in Africa regardless to color , race or religion.

I became head of Munazzamat in Uganda in 2000, it is important to note it had not happened before for someone to become a head of Munazzamat in his home country, I was the first.

This is how Munazzamat operates; it receives funding from different countries, for different projects, is that clear? For example money comes from Qatar, Yemen, UAE, and elsewhere. Such money comes with specific assignments, say to construct wells, mosques, schools, and so on.

When UAE sends money through Munazzamat to construct a mosque, after the construction of the Mosque, you have to clearly show the expenditure, how much the construction of the mosque cost, and the balance. The difference here is that the accountability does not go to Munazzamat but to UAE where the funds came from. If Yemen sends you money to construct a school, after the construction of the school, you send accountability to Yemen, not Munazzamat.

What about Munazzamat headquarters? What is their role then?

Munazzamat in Khartoum sends money for administration. It pays for water, electricity, salaries, office administration, maintenance, and so on. So, accountability for such money goes to Khartoum.

In our next issue, we’ll explain the Munazzamat money said to have been swindled by Sheikh Kirya

If you have any concerns regarding our interviews, please email us; editorial@thetorchnews.net, or hamzah.kyeyune@gmail.com

Sheikh Kakeeto “The Spy” Interview

Standard

Sheikh Kakeeto



Sheikh Muhammad Kamoga begged me to become Amiir of Nakasero Mosque

Nakasero is a Mosque with a rich history and so many tales to tell. Sheikh SULAIMAN KAKEETO has been there as the Amiir until a group mobilized by his former allies toppled him. HAMZA KYEYUNE caught up with him at his home of residence

Tell us about Sheikh Kakeeto

Sheikh Sulaiman Kakeeto is my name; I was born in Kakoba-Mbarara district in 1967 to Hajj Ausi Abdallah and Hajjat Amina Nabiwemba (RIP) from Kalisizo.

But word all along has had it that you are Tanzanian, and Mbarara is in Uganda as a matter of fact.

That is word of the ignorant about me, my grandparents are in Kannabulemu, Kakuuto-Kiyebe in Rakai district. Other grandparents of mine migrated to Kiziba in Tanzania, they were traditional doctors, the king invited them to go treat his people and they stayed there. It is always better to ask the person first hand information other than banking on speculation.

On the other hand, it is not a crime to be a Tanzanian, Allah created us in different ethnicities; it is in the holy Qur’an (surat hujraat)

And your school life?

I went to school to Kakoba Muslim Primary School from P1-6, then went to Simba battalion to complete primary. My father needed me to be a Sheikh, so he took me to Noorul-Islamia, to study Arabic, this school was located in Mbarara town, there were Libyans, Egyptians, and Palestinians teaching in that school. From Noorul-Islamia, I went to Nakateete Primary School in Kyazanga and finished my P.7 in secular. Thereafter, my parents took me to Tanzania to continue with Islamic studies, when I finished S.6 in Islamic studies, I came back here and started teaching at Madrasat Hamza Mbarara, while there, my elder brother Hajj Twaha Mukasa (a.k.a. Miomi) got me a scholarship to go to Pakistan, Abubaker University-Karachi but I did not go because of a few interruptions.

So you went back to teaching?

Kind of, I stayed at Nakasero mosque with Sheikh Muhammad Kizito Zziwa who was the chief Qadhi of SPIDQA (Society for the Propagation of Islam and Destruction of Qadianism), and Sheikh Twaib Lutaaya as the Chief Qadhi, I was still a young man. We taught Muslims at the mosque, the mosque members elected me as the Secretary of the Mosque and the deputy Imaam to Sheikh Kimbowa.

Sheikh Lutaaya got an idea of constructing a school, Sheikh Zziwa suggested we were not yet ready to construct a school and proposed we continue teaching Muslims from the mosque. other people bought the idea of starting the school and a campaign drive to solicit money was launched. The first money to be got was used to rent a building at Kanyaya, along Gayaza road and a nursery school started there. Sheikh Lutaaya appointed Hajjat Fafswa Kyamulabi Nakabuye, (Sister to Sheikh Ndirangwa of Kibuli) as the headmistress, Sheikh Muhammad Mukiibi, and me as the sheikhs to teach in the school. Sheikh Lutaaya was the first to bring his son Abas Lutaaya (now working with Tropical Bank) in the new school, we started with 7pupils.

There after, Sheikh Lutaaya got land at Buziga and made a temporary shelter with papyrus to act as classrooms, and one block for stuff quarters. We worked tirelessly; parents like Sheikh Abdu Mubiru liked our work and gave us children, the school flourished up to where it is today. Sheikh Lutaaya thereafter got us scholarships to Saudi Arabia to upgrade our education; I went to Jami’a Malik S’udi, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

When did you become Amiir at Nakasero?

When I finished my studies in Saudi Arabia and returned, I found so many problems here, more than 400 Tablighs were in prison, they had been arrested for attempting to seize UMSC, Nakasero mosque was occupied by the elderly, those few Tablighs that were not arrested had relocated to Katwe-Kinyoro mosque in Kisenyi, that’s where they had their prayers, others stayed indoors in fear of being arrested because the situation was so fragile. I also joined those at Katwe Kinyoro, we stayed there with Sheikh Sulyman Sesanga, Hajj Juma Kayongo (a.k.a. Jajja Tabligh), Sheikh Abdallah Kalanzi, Hajj Amri Mashindano, Hajj Busuulwa, Hajj Misagga, and so many others.

Sheikh Ssesanga suggested that we mobilize people and go back to Nakasero Mosque. From there we would also mobilize resources to help those in prison and their families. The main challenge then was there was no leader; they approached me and asked me to become their leader. I turned down the offer because the group they wanted me to lead was comprised of aggressive people; I told them am naturally mild and could not match the pace of their aggressiveness.  They continued pushing me, Sheikh Muhammad Kamoga and Sheikh Abdul-Kariim Ssentamu had exiled themselves in Kenya, they wrote persuading me to become the Amiir. With pleading from several people, I accepted and became the Amiir. The uphill task ahead of me was foremost to solicit assistance for people in prison and their families and to get lawyer to take on the case of the prisoners. With help from the Muslims, we got a lawyer (Nsubuga Bitangaaro), and he took on the case, they started releasing prisoners slowly. The prisoners would walk from Luzira prison up to Nakasero mosque, from where we would give them aid to their homes.

I opted for a liberal approach, I went to UMSC and met the Mufti Sheikh Ibrahim Saad Luwemba and requested to work with him. Luwemba (RIP) thought I was looking for another way of overthrowing UMSC again with the Tablighs. We talked for a very long time and he finally accepted to work with us. I requested him to allow the deputy Imaam of UMSC come from our side, he accepted and we sent there Sheikh Abdu Mubiru, the rest of remained at Nakasero as our base.

That sounds like a good move, what is it that split you people again?

But when the last group from Luzira came out of prison, they started abusing us that we are pagans, they were led by Sheikh Jamiir Mukulu. Whenever they came to Nakasero to pray, they would stand aside and wait until we finish our Swallah, then they would pray alone saying they can’t pray with us the pagans. We reached a point and asked them to leave our mosque if we are not Muslims, they pray in a place where there are ‘Muslims’. They refused, sheikh Abdul-Kariim was the leader of Imaams, we sat and resolved to flog them if they came back. As fate would have it, they came back during Isha-e prayer, our boys were ready with lashes, when they were in the middle of the prayer, the boys flogged them and they scampered and ran never to come back.

Unfortunately, Imaam Ssentongo (Imaam of Makerere Univ) had travelled from Pakistani, when he reached Nakasero mosque to pray, he found this group of people in Swallah and he joined them, the boys flogged him as well though he was innocent. That was an unfortunate incident for him. When these people left Nakasero, they set up their base at Mengo (Markazi) from where they continued to launch verbal attacks against us.

Another unfortunate incident happened, sheikh Kamoga who had exiled himself to Kenya claimed to have fired my deputy Sheikh Abdallah Kalanzi. The executive of the mosque sat and resolved that a person cannot base in Kenya and fire orders here. District Amiirs (leaders) were summoned to Kampala to further discuss the impasse; they also rejected Kamoga’s claims and affirmed that am the elected Amiir of Uganda who had the final say, not Kamoga. Few members including Sheikh Abdul-Kariim Ssentamu, Sheikh Idris Lwazi (RIP), Sheikh Hassan Kirya, Sheikh Muhammad Kiggundu, Sheikh Abdul-Hakiim Ssekimpi, Sheikh Muhamood Kibaate and others rejected the resolution.  Their interest was to dismiss me and takeover leadership but when they failed, they left and established their base at Market Street. They elected Sheikh Ssekimpi as their leader but Sheikh Kamoga as their overall head. At Market Street, they continued maligning me, one day, I had travelled to Rwanda that was in 1996, Sheikh Murta (Bro.to Sheikh Kamoga) led a group of people, they invaded Nakasero in my absence and beat up people there saying they were fighting Jihaad. They continued provoking us but we never fought back, our approach was liberal.

Sheikh Kakeeto “The Spy”

Sheikh Sulyman Kakeeto met president Museveni in Fort portal but has since been labeled a government spy. HAMZA KYEYUNE interviewed him on the said allegations and this is what he had to say.

 

Time and again, it has been said that you are a spy of the ruling government, which according to me Hamza, is not a crime because it is a profession many people are doing. But for clarity, what do you have to say about that?

You see when the Tabliq invaded Old Kampala in the early 1990’s to take over UMSC headquarters, I was not in the country, I was in Saudi Arabia. And you remember when the government tried to intervene using the Police, the Tablig youths killed a policeman and two police dogs, and many of the Tablig youths were arrested.

When I came back and they elected me as the Amiir of Uganda, we sat in a meeting at Nakasero with Sheikh Abdul-Kariim Ssentamu, Muhammad Kigundu and others and resolved to devise means of easing the tension between the Tablig the government.

Its important to note that I was the Amiir of the country but riding on a bicycle whenever I needed to attend any function.  The board members of Nakasero resolved that we meet the president, and request him to give our Amiir a vehicle, and a VIP passport, a Bus to transport our Imams, among other things. The president accepted to meet us, myself, Abdul Kareem Ssentamu, Muhammad Kiggundu wentb and met the president in Fort portal.

Sheikh Kakeeto

He welcomed our move to work with government, he gave me a vehicle, double cabin reg no; 840 UCB, a VIP Passport, and had as well promised to give us a bus although we never got it. Our relationship with the president and the government as Tabligs improved drastically.

What is surprising is that the same people with whom we sat in a meeting a resolved to meet the president, and some of whom I met the president with are the same people treading lies that am a spy of Museveni.   For them when they meet with the president, it is okay, but me when I meet the president, am his spy reporting them and causing their arrest, because that is what Kiggundu said before he fled to Kenya. What kind of hypocrisy is that? Those people have been obsessed with taking over Nakasero from the very on-set; all other allegations are a ploy to justify their ill intentions.

It has been said that you over stayed in power, and got compromised and corrupted. Shouldn’t you have stepped down honorably after a reasonable time as a good leader?

All those are opinions based on incoherent information. Foremost, even if a person is not in leadership, they can still make mistakes. Are all the people languishing in prisons necessarily leaders? Definitely not. When Abubakar  (R.A) was elected to succeed prophet Muhammad (PBUH), he told Muslims that; “I am not the best, if I become righteous in my leadership, follow me, if I go wrong, correct me”, what does that mean? Error is to human, not due to over stay in power.  Secondly, what is there to show that I got corrupted?

One would be quick to point at a 75 years lease of Nakasero, isn’t that as good as good as selling off the place.

But that does not in any way represent the alleged corruption, Nakasero mosque is a private property owned by Muslim Sunni association of Uganda and I am a trustee of Muslim Sunni association of Uganda. According to the constitution of Muslim Sunni Association, no one should own any property for Muslim Sunni or sell it. I did not sell the place because I have no powers to do that, therefore saying that the 75 year lease is as good as selling off the place is false because, selling is clearly different from leasing the place. What I did was leasing the place for re-development.

Is there anything you would have done differently if you were still there?

Yes, re-constructing the mosque. During my stay at Nakasero, people like Hajj Omar Mandela, Hajj Kaddu Kiberu of Peackock paints and other well-wishers used to re-paint the mosque. But the mosque is now dilapidated, it needs re-construction not re-painting.

Is there anything you are proud of that you were able to accomplish while still at Nakasero?

So many, me and my executive were able to pay school fees for so many needy children, solicited scholarships which have benefited many Muslims including children of my detractors. We have constructed schools including; Ibn Masood Nursery (Bunamwaya), Primary (Bunamwaya) and Secondary (Kibiri-Busabala). We have a hostel under construction in Kisenyi, when completed; it will be used as a training ground for new Muslim reverts Allah willing. We used to send more than 100 sheikhs across the country to lead Juma and Eid prayers, organized Qur’an competitions for the ladies, holiday seminars for the girls at Nakasero mosque, constructed mosques across the country, We bought land at Kirinya where we burry people who so wish to be buried there and those whose relatives are not known, helped the widows, prisoners, and the sick, and so many others, Allah knows best.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Watch out for Sheikh Hassan Kirya in the next issue of The Torch

hkyeyune@thetorchnews.net